Exploration
Played in 23,775 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
12.5% Simic
All commanders (30)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.71 · 47.9% (4,487 of 9,375 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.15 · 37.8% (1,817 of 4,805 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 2.01 · 46.3% (569 of 1,229 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 1.78 · 41.5% (368 of 887 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 1.75 · 29.3% (1,107 of 3,780 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 1.57 · 22.1% (1,584 of 7,167 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 1.48 · 26.4% (516 of 1,952 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 1.37 · 31.3% (196 of 627 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 1.37 · 16.1% (2,490 of 15,423 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.36 · 26.7% (313 of 1,174 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.30 · 26.6% (239 of 897 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.27 · 33.4% (110 of 329 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 1.23 · 27.5% (161 of 586 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.14 · 14.7% (1,040 of 7,079 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 1.14 · 22.2% (209 of 942 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 1.13 · 23.9% (159 of 664 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 1.12 · 19.3% (301 of 1,558 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.07 · 19.3% (233 of 1,209 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 1.06 · 18.0% (290 of 1,610 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 1.04 · 16.0% (384 of 2,394 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 0.98 · 20.8% (121 of 583 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.93 · 12.8% (500 of 3,900 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 0.92 · 15.0% (245 of 1,637 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.90 · 12.9% (403 of 3,122 decks)
- Arixmethes, Slumbering Isle relevance 0.79 · 11.0% (365 of 3,325 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.79 · 28.2% (24 of 85 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 0.77 · 13.1% (157 of 1,201 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (137 of 1,082 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.72 · 34.2% (13 of 38 decks)
- Mikey & Don, Party Planners relevance 0.71 · 13.1% (102 of 776 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.16 · 51.2% (12,184 of 23,775 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 1.07 · 39.0% (9,282 of 23,775 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.91 · 39.8% (9,457 of 23,775 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.83 · 29.8% (7,076 of 23,775 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.82 · 32.0% (7,606 of 23,775 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.81 · 30.5% (7,261 of 23,775 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.74 · 28.3% (6,719 of 23,775 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.73 · 34.0% (8,086 of 23,775 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.71 · 20.6% (4,890 of 23,775 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.71 · 37.2% (8,852 of 23,775 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.70 · 50.9% (12,104 of 23,775 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.67 · 35.3% (8,396 of 23,775 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.67 · 29.9% (7,099 of 23,775 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.65 · 20.6% (4,902 of 23,775 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.63 · 39.2% (9,327 of 23,775 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.61 · 25.9% (6,159 of 23,775 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.60 · 29.6% (7,047 of 23,775 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.60 · 22.0% (5,219 of 23,775 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.58 · 46.4% (11,022 of 23,775 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.57 · 19.0% (4,520 of 23,775 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.57 · 43.2% (10,260 of 23,775 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.56 · 32.3% (7,669 of 23,775 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (3,439 of 23,775 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.55 · 26.9% (6,390 of 23,775 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.54 · 25.7% (6,116 of 23,775 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.53 · 31.0% (7,373 of 23,775 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.52 · 15.2% (3,613 of 23,775 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.52 · 19.8% (4,708 of 23,775 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.50 · 15.3% (3,645 of 23,775 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.50 · 30.5% (7,256 of 23,775 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.16 · 51.2% (12,184 of 23,775 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.91 · 39.8% (9,457 of 23,775 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.83 · 29.8% (7,076 of 23,775 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.82 · 32.0% (7,606 of 23,775 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.81 · 30.5% (7,261 of 23,775 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.74 · 28.3% (6,719 of 23,775 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.73 · 34.0% (8,086 of 23,775 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.71 · 37.2% (8,852 of 23,775 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.70 · 50.9% (12,104 of 23,775 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.67 · 35.3% (8,396 of 23,775 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.65 · 20.6% (4,902 of 23,775 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.60 · 22.0% (5,219 of 23,775 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.57 · 19.0% (4,520 of 23,775 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.55 · 26.9% (6,390 of 23,775 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.54 · 25.7% (6,116 of 23,775 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.52 · 15.2% (3,613 of 23,775 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.50 · 17.7% (4,220 of 23,775 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.48 · 25.9% (6,151 of 23,775 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.71 · 20.6% (4,890 of 23,775 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.50 · 15.3% (3,645 of 23,775 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Burgeoning relevance 1.07 · 39.0% (9,282 of 23,775 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.53 · 31.0% (7,373 of 23,775 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.52 · 19.8% (4,708 of 23,775 decks)
All instants (8)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.67 · 29.9% (7,099 of 23,775 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.63 · 39.2% (9,327 of 23,775 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.61 · 25.9% (6,159 of 23,775 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.60 · 29.6% (7,047 of 23,775 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.58 · 46.4% (11,022 of 23,775 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.50 · 30.5% (7,256 of 23,775 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.48 · 25.6% (6,096 of 23,775 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.48 · 18.2% (4,336 of 23,775 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Three Visits relevance 0.57 · 43.2% (10,260 of 23,775 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.56 · 32.3% (7,669 of 23,775 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.56 · 14.5% (3,439 of 23,775 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.50 · 39.1% (9,299 of 23,775 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.68 · 39.3% (9,351 of 23,775 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.64 · 41.3% (9,812 of 23,775 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.58 · 33.0% (7,840 of 23,775 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.58 · 33.7% (8,001 of 23,775 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.57 · 17.3% (4,114 of 23,775 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.54 · 14.6% (3,480 of 23,775 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.52 · 23.6% (5,614 of 23,775 decks)
All lands (8)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.71 · 56.4% (13,408 of 23,775 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.58 · 36.3% (8,626 of 23,775 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.57 · 20.6% (4,900 of 23,775 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.53 · 22.9% (5,433 of 23,775 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.50 · 22.3% (5,312 of 23,775 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.49 · 25.1% (5,973 of 23,775 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.49 · 20.5% (4,868 of 23,775 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.49 · 19.9% (4,743 of 23,775 decks)
EDH data for Exploration: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 23,775 real decks.