Exploration
Played in 20,680 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
10.9% Sultai
3030+16+2+3+5+5+9+10+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 2.80 · 41.4% (5,757 of 13,907 decks)
- Homer, the Hermit relevance 2.64 · 46.7% (2,274 of 4,871 decks)
- Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 1.94 · 32.1% (908 of 2,831 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 1.73 · 30.4% (509 of 1,672 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 1.68 · 21.6% (1,558 of 7,228 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 1.54 · 17.1% (2,271 of 13,311 decks)
- Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 1.46 · 22.7% (491 of 2,164 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 1.02 · 9.1% (2,510 of 27,542 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 1.02 · 27.1% (49 of 181 decks)
- Gonti, Canny Acquisitor relevance 0.99 · 11.6% (611 of 5,262 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 0.96 · 12.1% (419 of 3,470 decks)
- Tatsunari, Toad Rider relevance 0.79 · 10.3% (262 of 2,552 decks)
- Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 0.63 · 7.5% (261 of 3,493 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.52 · 14.2% (18 of 127 decks)
- Jorn, God of Winter // Kaldring, the Rimestaff relevance 0.48 · 5.8% (169 of 2,922 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 0.47 · 5.7% (174 of 3,047 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.41 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 0.33 · 3.1% (366 of 11,642 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.32 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (49 of 1,002 decks)
- Nashi, Illusion Gadgeteer relevance 0.26 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Indominus Rex, Alpha relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (140 of 5,067 decks)
- Teval, Arbiter of Virtue relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (85 of 2,938 decks)
- Kadena, Slinking Sorcerer relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (105 of 3,897 decks)
- Henry Wu, InGen Geneticist relevance 0.22 · 3.9% (25 of 649 decks)
- Kotis, the Fangkeeper relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (196 of 9,445 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.20 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- The Mimeoplasm relevance 0.20 · 2.4% (90 of 3,717 decks)
- Felix Five-Boots relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (69 of 2,744 decks)
- Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 0.17 · 3.9% (12 of 306 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.18 · 47.2% (9,751 of 20,680 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 38.2% (7,903 of 20,680 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.93 · 38.6% (7,989 of 20,680 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.87 · 34.5% (7,135 of 20,680 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.86 · 48.8% (10,097 of 20,680 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.83 · 42.3% (8,756 of 20,680 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.77 · 26.6% (5,498 of 20,680 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.76 · 35.5% (7,345 of 20,680 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.72 · 20.8% (4,306 of 20,680 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.71 · 29.0% (5,993 of 20,680 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.70 · 36.3% (7,514 of 20,680 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.69 · 21.4% (4,433 of 20,680 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (3,965 of 20,680 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.67 · 34.7% (7,169 of 20,680 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.67 · 27.9% (5,779 of 20,680 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.65 · 26.3% (5,429 of 20,680 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.64 · 48.2% (9,958 of 20,680 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.63 · 22.1% (4,579 of 20,680 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.62 · 19.7% (4,064 of 20,680 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.59 · 29.9% (6,191 of 20,680 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.58 · 32.7% (6,766 of 20,680 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.58 · 19.2% (3,962 of 20,680 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.57 · 25.4% (5,250 of 20,680 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.56 · 38.5% (7,965 of 20,680 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.55 · 28.4% (5,883 of 20,680 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.54 · 27.5% (5,697 of 20,680 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.54 · 30.8% (6,368 of 20,680 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.54 · 19.9% (4,125 of 20,680 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.53 · 27.0% (5,581 of 20,680 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.53 · 35.9% (7,416 of 20,680 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.18 · 47.2% (9,751 of 20,680 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 38.2% (7,903 of 20,680 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.93 · 38.6% (7,989 of 20,680 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.87 · 34.5% (7,135 of 20,680 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.86 · 48.8% (10,097 of 20,680 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.83 · 42.3% (8,756 of 20,680 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.71 · 29.0% (5,993 of 20,680 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.70 · 36.3% (7,514 of 20,680 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.69 · 21.4% (4,433 of 20,680 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.67 · 27.9% (5,779 of 20,680 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.65 · 26.3% (5,429 of 20,680 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.64 · 48.2% (9,958 of 20,680 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.63 · 22.1% (4,579 of 20,680 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.62 · 19.7% (4,064 of 20,680 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.57 · 25.4% (5,250 of 20,680 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.53 · 34.1% (7,059 of 20,680 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.77 · 26.6% (5,498 of 20,680 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.54 · 27.5% (5,697 of 20,680 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.72 · 20.8% (4,306 of 20,680 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.59 · 29.9% (6,191 of 20,680 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.58 · 32.7% (6,766 of 20,680 decks)
All instants (5)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.76 · 35.5% (7,345 of 20,680 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.67 · 34.7% (7,169 of 20,680 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.54 · 30.8% (6,368 of 20,680 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.54 · 19.9% (4,125 of 20,680 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.53 · 27.0% (5,581 of 20,680 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.67 · 19.2% (3,965 of 20,680 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.58 · 19.2% (3,962 of 20,680 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.56 · 38.5% (7,965 of 20,680 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.55 · 28.4% (5,883 of 20,680 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.53 · 35.9% (7,416 of 20,680 decks)
All utility lands (9)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.72 · 45.0% (9,308 of 20,680 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.71 · 29.7% (6,152 of 20,680 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.68 · 35.0% (7,238 of 20,680 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.66 · 39.1% (8,087 of 20,680 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.63 · 33.3% (6,883 of 20,680 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.63 · 35.4% (7,331 of 20,680 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.62 · 32.6% (6,745 of 20,680 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.61 · 30.4% (6,293 of 20,680 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.60 · 32.6% (6,751 of 20,680 decks)
All lands (10)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.60 · 24.8% (5,122 of 20,680 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.60 · 25.2% (5,206 of 20,680 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.59 · 28.3% (5,859 of 20,680 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.59 · 28.1% (5,816 of 20,680 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.59 · 23.4% (4,841 of 20,680 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.58 · 26.8% (5,550 of 20,680 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.57 · 23.1% (4,786 of 20,680 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.57 · 21.7% (4,493 of 20,680 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.56 · 21.3% (4,403 of 20,680 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.53 · 30.6% (6,336 of 20,680 decks)
EDH data for Exploration: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 20,680 real decks.




















































































