Exploration
Played in 6,307 Ink-Treader decks
Color Identity Spread
3.3% Ink-Treader
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (23)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.50 · 49.4% (4,605 of 9,325 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.75 · 9.9% (1,039 of 10,462 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.54 · 13.2% (56 of 423 decks)
- Crystal, Inhuman Princess relevance 0.34 · 5.3% (198 of 3,723 decks)
- The Thing relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (42 of 967 decks)
- Mister Fantastic relevance 0.20 · 3.6% (80 of 2,217 decks)
- Human Torch relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (23 of 539 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Ian Chesterton relevance 0.17 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.16 · 7.3% (6 of 82 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (5 of 74 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.14 · 7.5% (4 of 53 decks)
- Invisible Woman relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (26 of 1,021 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Barbara Wright relevance 0.08 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- The Fantastic Four relevance 0.07 · 1.5% (23 of 1,496 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist relevance 0.06 · 2.5% (5 of 198 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Akiri, Line-Slinger relevance 0.05 · 1.5% (10 of 655 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.04 · 1.8% (4 of 225 decks)
- Power Pack relevance 0.03 · 1.5% (4 of 272 decks)
- Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant // Hargilde, Kindly Runechanter relevance 0.03 · 1.0% (5 of 499 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.02 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Susan Foreman relevance 0.02 · 1.6% (2 of 128 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Sarah Jane Smith relevance 0.02 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Dan Lewis relevance 0.02 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.35 · 70.6% (4,453 of 6,307 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.28 · 62.0% (3,909 of 6,307 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.28 · 66.1% (4,171 of 6,307 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.25 · 62.7% (3,955 of 6,307 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.18 · 69.9% (4,410 of 6,307 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.16 · 46.1% (2,908 of 6,307 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.15 · 60.2% (3,795 of 6,307 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.12 · 48.2% (3,040 of 6,307 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.11 · 49.0% (3,093 of 6,307 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.11 · 57.1% (3,604 of 6,307 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.10 · 69.6% (4,390 of 6,307 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.03 · 50.4% (3,180 of 6,307 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.01 · 49.1% (3,095 of 6,307 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.00 · 39.6% (2,500 of 6,307 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.00 · 34.7% (2,190 of 6,307 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.99 · 42.6% (2,689 of 6,307 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.97 · 48.7% (3,069 of 6,307 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.93 · 37.0% (2,336 of 6,307 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.89 · 40.1% (2,530 of 6,307 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.88 · 29.6% (1,864 of 6,307 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.87 · 36.0% (2,270 of 6,307 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.87 · 48.9% (3,086 of 6,307 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.86 · 31.1% (1,959 of 6,307 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.85 · 32.9% (2,076 of 6,307 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.85 · 34.3% (2,164 of 6,307 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.84 · 36.9% (2,328 of 6,307 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.83 · 30.1% (1,901 of 6,307 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.83 · 31.1% (1,961 of 6,307 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.82 · 30.3% (1,914 of 6,307 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.81 · 29.8% (1,880 of 6,307 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.35 · 70.6% (4,453 of 6,307 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.28 · 62.0% (3,909 of 6,307 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.28 · 66.1% (4,171 of 6,307 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.25 · 62.7% (3,955 of 6,307 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.18 · 69.9% (4,410 of 6,307 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.15 · 60.2% (3,795 of 6,307 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.12 · 48.2% (3,040 of 6,307 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.11 · 49.0% (3,093 of 6,307 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.11 · 57.1% (3,604 of 6,307 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.10 · 69.6% (4,390 of 6,307 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.03 · 50.4% (3,180 of 6,307 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.00 · 39.6% (2,500 of 6,307 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.99 · 42.6% (2,689 of 6,307 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.97 · 48.7% (3,069 of 6,307 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.89 · 40.1% (2,530 of 6,307 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.88 · 29.6% (1,864 of 6,307 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.87 · 36.0% (2,270 of 6,307 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.86 · 31.1% (1,959 of 6,307 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.85 · 32.9% (2,076 of 6,307 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.85 · 34.3% (2,164 of 6,307 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.83 · 31.1% (1,961 of 6,307 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.81 · 29.8% (1,880 of 6,307 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.79 · 28.1% (1,773 of 6,307 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.78 · 29.8% (1,880 of 6,307 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.76 · 25.2% (1,587 of 6,307 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.74 · 24.9% (1,571 of 6,307 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines relevance 0.74 · 24.7% (1,555 of 6,307 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.66 · 21.6% (1,361 of 6,307 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.64 · 21.5% (1,353 of 6,307 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.16 · 46.1% (2,908 of 6,307 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.82 · 30.3% (1,914 of 6,307 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.01 · 49.1% (3,095 of 6,307 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.93 · 37.0% (2,336 of 6,307 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.83 · 30.1% (1,901 of 6,307 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.72 · 26.3% (1,656 of 6,307 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.63 · 22.5% (1,419 of 6,307 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.87 · 48.9% (3,086 of 6,307 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.84 · 36.9% (2,328 of 6,307 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.66 · 32.6% (2,059 of 6,307 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.00 · 34.7% (2,190 of 6,307 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.81 · 28.4% (1,793 of 6,307 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.68 · 55.7% (3,510 of 6,307 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.02 · 39.3% (2,480 of 6,307 decks)
All lands (7)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.83 · 41.1% (2,590 of 6,307 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.73 · 34.2% (2,155 of 6,307 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.73 · 59.5% (3,753 of 6,307 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.69 · 25.4% (1,602 of 6,307 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.69 · 31.3% (1,976 of 6,307 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.65 · 38.0% (2,395 of 6,307 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.63 · 44.7% (2,822 of 6,307 decks)
EDH data for Exploration: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,307 real decks.