Cards like Cultivate
2.5× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other Selesnya decks
74% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
2.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.95 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Cultivate 70%
- Kodama's Reach 65%
- Rampant Growth 54%
- Migration Path 30%
- Explosive Vegetation 21%
- Shared Roots 10%
- Search for Tomorrow 7%
- Map the Frontier 4%
- Far Wanderings 4%
- Grow from the Ashes 3%
- Roamer's Routine 3%
- Reach the Horizon 2%
- Terramorph 2%
- Primal Growth 2%
- Deep Reconnaissance 2%
- Untamed Wilds 2%
- They Went This Way 1%
Other options: Path to the Festival, New Generation's Technique, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Verdant Mastery, Map the Wastes
Cards like Nature's Lore
3.6× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 37% of other Selesnya decks
61% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Selesnya decks
1.8 per deck on average
vs. 0.56 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 57%
- Skyshroud Claim 56%
- Three Visits 48%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 8%
- Hunting Wilds 5%
- Ranger's Path 3%
- Glimpse the Core 1%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Mirari's Wake
18× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
67% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Selesnya decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Mirari's Wake 63%
- Zendikar Resurgent 27%
Other options: Dictate of Karametra, Heartbeat of Spring
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 48% of other Selesnya decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 31% of other Selesnya decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.1 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 45%
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 44%
- Elvish Mystic 38%
- Fyndhorn Elves 27%
- Nantuko Elder 1%
- Boreal Druid 1%
- Steward of Valeron 1%
Other options: Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Beast Within
1.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 39% of other Selesnya decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 19% of other Selesnya decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Beast Within 47%
- Generous Gift 36%
Cards like Harrow
14× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Scapeshift
Cards like Austere Command
9.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Selesnya decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
2.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Selesnya decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Selesnya decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 30%
- Lightning Greaves 25%
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
8.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Aerial Responder
17× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Healer's Flock, Seraph of Dawn, Sungrace Pegasus
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
9.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
2.3× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Eladamri's Call
1.4× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Selesnya decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Selesnya decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
- Eladamri's Call 20%
- Worldly Tutor 11%
- Sylvan Tutor 2%
Cards like Path to Exile
1.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 54% of other Selesnya decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.57 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Angelic Skirmisher
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Wood Elves
8.2× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Sakura-Tribe Elder
6.7× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Krosan Wayfarer, Oashra Cultivator
Cards like Sol Ring
1.9× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 73% of other Selesnya decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Selesnya decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.75 in other Selesnya decks
Cards like Fanatic of Rhonas
3.1× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Selesnya decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Selesnya decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Other options: Raucous Audience, Whisperer of the Wilds
Cards like Majestic Myriarch
Over 20× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
Cards like Toski, Bearer of Secrets
5.8× as likely as other Selesnya decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Selesnya decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Selesnya decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Selesnya decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.70 · 60.1% (95 of 158 decks)
- Odric, Lunarch Marshal relevance 0.46 · 77.2% (122 of 158 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.60 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.54 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Concerted Effort relevance 0.62 · 32.3% (51 of 158 decks)
- Akroma, Angel of Wrath relevance 0.57 · 38.6% (61 of 158 decks)
- Crystalline Giant relevance 0.64 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Majestic Myriarch relevance 0.61 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.46 · 52.5% (83 of 158 decks)
- Angelic Skirmisher relevance 0.52 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Baneslayer Angel relevance 0.53 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.52 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.47 · 38.0% (60 of 158 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.38 · 55.7% (88 of 158 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.54 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.41 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.58 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.48 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.46 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Courage relevance 0.47 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.45 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.56 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Aerial Responder relevance 0.49 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.42 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Shrike Force relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.33 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.46 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.48 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Angel of Invention relevance 0.43 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.41 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Sigarda, Font of Blessings relevance 0.34 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 0.33 · 41.1% (65 of 158 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.34 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.24 · 63.3% (100 of 158 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.41 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Vexilus Praetor relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.44 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.37 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Vengeance relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.35 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.42 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.38 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Selective Adaptation relevance 0.46 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.32 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.26 · 44.3% (70 of 158 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Odric, Lunarch Marshal relevance 0.46 · 77.2% (122 of 158 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.54 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Akroma, Angel of Wrath relevance 0.57 · 38.6% (61 of 158 decks)
- Crystalline Giant relevance 0.64 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Majestic Myriarch relevance 0.61 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Angelic Skirmisher relevance 0.52 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Baneslayer Angel relevance 0.53 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.52 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.47 · 38.0% (60 of 158 decks)
- Sire of Seven Deaths relevance 0.54 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Courage relevance 0.47 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.45 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Aerial Responder relevance 0.49 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Shrike Force relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.33 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Angel of Invention relevance 0.43 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.41 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Sigarda, Font of Blessings relevance 0.34 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Karametra, God of Harvests relevance 0.33 · 41.1% (65 of 158 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.34 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Vexilus Praetor relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.37 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.38 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Yasharn, Implacable Earth relevance 0.32 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Dragon Sniper relevance 0.35 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.26 · 44.3% (70 of 158 decks)
- Archon of Valor's Reach relevance 0.36 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Oketra the True relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.43 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.31 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.27 · 36.1% (57 of 158 decks)
- Thraben Watcher relevance 0.36 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.37 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.21 · 57.0% (90 of 158 decks)
- Lyra Dawnbringer relevance 0.31 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Embodiment of Insight relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- The Legend of Kyoshi // Avatar Kyoshi relevance 0.34 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.29 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Tower Winder relevance 0.34 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.26 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Boon-Bringer Valkyrie relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.29 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Sigarda, Host of Herons relevance 0.28 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.29 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Dragonlord Dromoka relevance 0.29 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Segovian Angel relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 0.24 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
All artifacts (36)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.46 · 52.5% (83 of 158 decks)
- Eater of Virtue relevance 0.43 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.29 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Oketra's Monument relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Sword of Vengeance relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.20 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.25 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.16 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.18 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.16 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.19 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.20 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- The Immortal Sun relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.07 · 54.4% (86 of 158 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Pearl Medallion relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 70.9% (112 of 158 decks)
- Halo Fountain relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Concerted Effort relevance 0.62 · 32.3% (51 of 158 decks)
- True Conviction relevance 0.41 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.42 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.37 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Terra Eternal relevance 0.41 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.35 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Mirari's Wake relevance 0.20 · 63.3% (100 of 158 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.36 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.24 · 38.0% (60 of 158 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.35 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.42 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.26 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.31 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.26 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Always Watching relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.21 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.19 · 19.0% (30 of 158 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.17 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.18 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.22 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.20 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Privileged Position relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.19 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.19 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.16 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Aura Shards relevance 0.15 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.14 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.18 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.13 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Luminarch Ascension relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Angelic Destiny relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Flowering of the White Tree relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.12 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
All instants (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.70 · 60.1% (95 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.24 · 63.3% (100 of 158 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.41 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.44 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.35 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.35 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.26 · 41.8% (66 of 158 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.37 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.27 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.22 · 22.2% (35 of 158 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.23 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.20 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.23 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Final Showdown relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.19 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.18 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.13 · 47.5% (75 of 158 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.15 · 36.1% (57 of 158 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.17 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
- Return to Dust relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Earthshape relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.12 · 48.7% (77 of 158 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.22 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.18 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Blessing relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.19 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Eerie Interlude relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.18 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.16 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Secure the Wastes relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.16 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.08 · 60.1% (95 of 158 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.14 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.06 · 68.4% (108 of 158 decks)
- Make a Stand relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Get Lost relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.15 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Rebuff the Wicked relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.14 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.60 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.38 · 55.7% (88 of 158 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.58 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.46 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.56 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.48 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Akroma's Vengeance relevance 0.43 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Selective Adaptation relevance 0.46 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 65.2% (103 of 158 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.26 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.36 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.35 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.32 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.33 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Slash the Ranks relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.29 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.19 · 48.1% (76 of 158 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.21 · 38.6% (61 of 158 decks)
- Cleansing Nova relevance 0.27 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.17 · 51.9% (82 of 158 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.23 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 53.8% (85 of 158 decks)
- Hour of Revelation relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.25 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Far Wanderings relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.14 · 57.0% (90 of 158 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.20 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.12 · 69.6% (110 of 158 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.23 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.21 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.22 · 6.3% (10 of 158 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.17 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Winds of Abandon relevance 0.21 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Roamer's Routine relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- The Great Aurora relevance 0.29 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Planar Outburst relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.48 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.42 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.39 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Wrenn and Realmbreaker relevance 0.31 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Ajani, the Greathearted relevance 0.17 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.19 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.46 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.34 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.42 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.25 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Ondu Inversion // Ondu Skyruins relevance 0.32 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.31 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.30 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.23 · 27.8% (44 of 158 decks)
- Emeria's Call // Emeria, Shattered Skyclave relevance 0.28 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.26 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.19 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Stirring Wildwood relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.26 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.18 · 32.9% (52 of 158 decks)
- Restless Prairie relevance 0.22 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Emeria, the Sky Ruin relevance 0.25 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.22 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Scattered Groves relevance 0.18 · 28.5% (45 of 158 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.26 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.22 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.17 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.17 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.21 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Sejiri Shelter // Sejiri Glacier relevance 0.20 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Cave of the Frost Dragon relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.18 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Blinkmoth Nexus relevance 0.24 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.17 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.21 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Windbrisk Heights relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (8 of 158 decks)
- Nantuko Monastery relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.13 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Secret Tunnel relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.14 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.12 · 22.2% (35 of 158 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.13 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.14 · 8.9% (14 of 158 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Strength of the Harvest // Haven of the Harvest relevance 0.14 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.16 · 3.2% (5 of 158 decks)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.13 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
All lands (43)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.29 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.25 · 12.0% (19 of 158 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.23 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.18 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.19 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 38.6% (61 of 158 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.18 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.20 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.16 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Arctic Treeline relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (11 of 158 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.19 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.20 · 4.4% (7 of 158 decks)
- Radiant Grove relevance 0.18 · 9.5% (15 of 158 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.13 · 32.3% (51 of 158 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.11 · 48.1% (76 of 158 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.11 · 43.7% (69 of 158 decks)
- Selesnya Guildgate relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (9 of 158 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.09 · 56.3% (89 of 158 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.13 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.11 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.11 · 33.5% (53 of 158 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.13 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.10 · 39.9% (63 of 158 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.13 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (6 of 158 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.07 · 59.5% (94 of 158 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.06 · 64.6% (102 of 158 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.10 · 7.6% (12 of 158 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (4 of 158 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 77.8% (123 of 158 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.01 · 93.7% (148 of 158 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 94.3% (149 of 158 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor, from 158 real Commander partner decks.