2
All commanders (2)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.55 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.53 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
30
All most relevant (30)
- Armageddon relevance 2.55 · 53.2% (25 of 47 decks)
- Fall of the Thran relevance 1.87 · 29.8% (14 of 47 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.64 · 55.3% (26 of 47 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.47 · 46.8% (22 of 47 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.45 · 55.3% (26 of 47 decks)
- Ravages of War relevance 1.40 · 21.3% (10 of 47 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.31 · 55.3% (26 of 47 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.30 · 53.2% (25 of 47 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.23 · 42.6% (20 of 47 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.20 · 38.3% (18 of 47 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.17 · 46.8% (22 of 47 decks)
- Cataclysm relevance 1.16 · 17.0% (8 of 47 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.14 · 40.4% (19 of 47 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.10 · 40.4% (19 of 47 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.98 · 27.7% (13 of 47 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.97 · 36.2% (17 of 47 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.95 · 29.8% (14 of 47 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.95 · 25.5% (12 of 47 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.93 · 29.8% (14 of 47 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.89 · 27.7% (13 of 47 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.88 · 31.9% (15 of 47 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.86 · 23.4% (11 of 47 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.86 · 36.2% (17 of 47 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.85 · 29.8% (14 of 47 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.85 · 19.1% (9 of 47 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.84 · 36.2% (17 of 47 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.82 · 19.1% (9 of 47 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.82 · 27.7% (13 of 47 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.79 · 34.0% (16 of 47 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.78 · 25.5% (12 of 47 decks)
25
All creatures (25)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.45 · 55.3% (26 of 47 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.30 · 53.2% (25 of 47 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.23 · 42.6% (20 of 47 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.20 · 38.3% (18 of 47 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.17 · 46.8% (22 of 47 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.10 · 40.4% (19 of 47 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.98 · 27.7% (13 of 47 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.97 · 36.2% (17 of 47 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.95 · 29.8% (14 of 47 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.95 · 25.5% (12 of 47 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.93 · 29.8% (14 of 47 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.86 · 36.2% (17 of 47 decks)
- Emeria Shepherd relevance 0.85 · 19.1% (9 of 47 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.84 · 36.2% (17 of 47 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.82 · 19.1% (9 of 47 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.82 · 27.7% (13 of 47 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.79 · 34.0% (16 of 47 decks)
- Braids, Arisen Nightmare relevance 0.75 · 29.8% (14 of 47 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.74 · 23.4% (11 of 47 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.74 · 27.7% (13 of 47 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.73 · 23.4% (11 of 47 decks)
- Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.70 · 25.5% (12 of 47 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.69 · 40.4% (19 of 47 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 0.68 · 23.4% (11 of 47 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.68 · 25.5% (12 of 47 decks)
4
All artifacts (4)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.47 · 46.8% (22 of 47 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.14 · 40.4% (19 of 47 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.89 · 27.7% (13 of 47 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.68 · 17.0% (8 of 47 decks)
6
All enchantments (6)
- Fall of the Thran relevance 1.87 · 29.8% (14 of 47 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.88 · 31.9% (15 of 47 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.86 · 23.4% (11 of 47 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.73 · 29.8% (14 of 47 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.70 · 21.3% (10 of 47 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.69 · 17.0% (8 of 47 decks)
3
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.31 · 55.3% (26 of 47 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.85 · 29.8% (14 of 47 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.78 · 25.5% (12 of 47 decks)
4
All sorceries (4)
- Armageddon relevance 2.55 · 53.2% (25 of 47 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.64 · 55.3% (26 of 47 decks)
- Ravages of War relevance 1.40 · 21.3% (10 of 47 decks)
- Cataclysm relevance 1.16 · 17.0% (8 of 47 decks)
5
All utility lands (5)
- Wasteland relevance 1.02 · 25.5% (12 of 47 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.97 · 17.0% (8 of 47 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.91 · 27.7% (13 of 47 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.84 · 31.9% (15 of 47 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.78 · 21.3% (10 of 47 decks)
3
All lands (3)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.77 · 21.3% (10 of 47 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.72 · 17.0% (8 of 47 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.71 · 19.1% (9 of 47 decks)
EDH data for Desolation Angel: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 47 real decks.






































