Color Identity Spread
5.7% Naya
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 4.14 · 61.7% (2,696 of 4,371 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.27 · 39.8% (1,482 of 3,722 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.87 · 37.8% (694 of 1,836 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.13 · 24.3% (339 of 1,394 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 2.02 · 33.3% (124 of 372 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.91 · 50.0% (49 of 98 decks)
- Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 1.90 · 10.5% (2,842 of 27,179 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 1.26 · 9.6% (247 of 2,576 decks)
- Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (12 of 154 decks)
- Tifa, Martial Artist relevance 0.51 · 2.9% (154 of 5,309 decks)
- Rocco, Street Chef relevance 0.43 · 2.3% (178 of 7,815 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.42 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Annie Flash, the Veteran relevance 0.39 · 4.0% (19 of 474 decks)
- Havi, the All-Father relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (25 of 894 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.30 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 0.25 · 1.5% (81 of 5,568 decks)
- Marisi, Breaker of the Coil relevance 0.25 · 1.5% (62 of 4,053 decks)
- Jetmir, Nexus of Revels relevance 0.24 · 1.4% (68 of 4,782 decks)
- Mayael the Anima relevance 0.20 · 1.5% (31 of 2,070 decks)
- Johan relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (5 of 150 decks)
- Val, Marooned Surveyor relevance 0.19 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Hardy of Myra's Marvels // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.18 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Samut, Voice of Dissent relevance 0.17 · 1.5% (16 of 1,036 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (3 of 81 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.17 · 1.0% (52 of 5,064 decks)
- Marath, Will of the Wild relevance 0.15 · 1.1% (23 of 2,052 decks)
- Aragorn, Hornburg Hero relevance 0.14 · 1.1% (19 of 1,658 decks)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.13 · 2.8% (3 of 109 decks)
- Preston Garvey, Minuteman relevance 0.13 · 1.2% (13 of 1,067 decks)
All most relevant (28)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.53 · 46.9% (4,734 of 10,094 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.42 · 52.1% (5,260 of 10,094 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.36 · 42.0% (4,238 of 10,094 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.35 · 41.1% (4,147 of 10,094 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.35 · 42.9% (4,330 of 10,094 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.32 · 51.2% (5,168 of 10,094 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.30 · 36.6% (3,690 of 10,094 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.29 · 49.6% (5,007 of 10,094 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.24 · 33.4% (3,367 of 10,094 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.17 · 50.5% (5,097 of 10,094 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.14 · 46.1% (4,654 of 10,094 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.14 · 29.0% (2,926 of 10,094 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.12 · 33.6% (3,389 of 10,094 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.11 · 31.6% (3,193 of 10,094 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.11 · 29.9% (3,015 of 10,094 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.08 · 30.0% (3,029 of 10,094 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.07 · 27.9% (2,821 of 10,094 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.06 · 36.5% (3,683 of 10,094 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 26.9% (2,719 of 10,094 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.02 · 27.1% (2,731 of 10,094 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.01 · 38.3% (3,871 of 10,094 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.01 · 25.5% (2,572 of 10,094 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.99 · 29.9% (3,017 of 10,094 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.97 · 26.3% (2,653 of 10,094 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.97 · 23.4% (2,367 of 10,094 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.96 · 42.9% (4,329 of 10,094 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.93 · 33.1% (3,337 of 10,094 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.91 · 30.3% (3,059 of 10,094 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.53 · 46.9% (4,734 of 10,094 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.42 · 52.1% (5,260 of 10,094 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.36 · 42.0% (4,238 of 10,094 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.35 · 41.1% (4,147 of 10,094 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.32 · 51.2% (5,168 of 10,094 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.30 · 36.6% (3,690 of 10,094 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.17 · 50.5% (5,097 of 10,094 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.12 · 33.6% (3,389 of 10,094 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.11 · 29.9% (3,015 of 10,094 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.08 · 30.0% (3,029 of 10,094 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.06 · 36.5% (3,683 of 10,094 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.97 · 23.4% (2,367 of 10,094 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.96 · 42.9% (4,329 of 10,094 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.93 · 33.1% (3,337 of 10,094 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.91 · 30.3% (3,059 of 10,094 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.29 · 49.6% (5,007 of 10,094 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 26.9% (2,719 of 10,094 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.97 · 26.3% (2,653 of 10,094 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 1.35 · 42.9% (4,330 of 10,094 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.24 · 33.4% (3,367 of 10,094 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.99 · 29.9% (3,017 of 10,094 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.14 · 46.1% (4,654 of 10,094 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.01 · 38.3% (3,871 of 10,094 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.14 · 29.0% (2,926 of 10,094 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.11 · 31.6% (3,193 of 10,094 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.07 · 27.9% (2,821 of 10,094 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.02 · 27.1% (2,731 of 10,094 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.01 · 25.5% (2,572 of 10,094 decks)
All utility lands (16)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.38 · 40.8% (4,118 of 10,094 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.38 · 40.2% (4,057 of 10,094 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.38 · 40.4% (4,082 of 10,094 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.37 · 40.2% (4,062 of 10,094 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.37 · 40.3% (4,066 of 10,094 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.36 · 39.7% (4,011 of 10,094 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.33 · 38.1% (3,850 of 10,094 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.28 · 36.8% (3,718 of 10,094 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.24 · 35.4% (3,578 of 10,094 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.15 · 31.3% (3,156 of 10,094 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.96 · 23.9% (2,409 of 10,094 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 0.96 · 23.1% (2,331 of 10,094 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.92 · 25.4% (2,567 of 10,094 decks)
- Desert relevance 0.92 · 23.2% (2,345 of 10,094 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.89 · 26.9% (2,719 of 10,094 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 0.88 · 21.2% (2,139 of 10,094 decks)
All lands (6)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.27 · 40.0% (4,035 of 10,094 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.26 · 39.9% (4,030 of 10,094 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.25 · 39.3% (3,966 of 10,094 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.16 · 33.1% (3,339 of 10,094 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 1.13 · 29.7% (2,996 of 10,094 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.11 · 30.1% (3,037 of 10,094 decks)
EDH data for Azusa, Lost but Seeking: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 10,094 real decks.