Color Identity Spread
7.8% Gruul
All commanders (30)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 3.31 · 58.5% (2,392 of 4,092 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 3.24 · 52.8% (2,809 of 5,323 decks)
- Grizzlegom, Hurloon Hero relevance 2.99 · 61.5% (990 of 1,610 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.22 · 45.7% (321 of 702 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 2.20 · 52.6% (220 of 418 decks)
- Rydia, Summoner of Mist relevance 2.12 · 39.9% (343 of 859 decks)
- Borborygmos Enraged relevance 2.10 · 34.7% (483 of 1,390 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 2.10 · 37.7% (377 of 1,000 decks)
- Hugs, Grisly Guardian relevance 2.07 · 42.1% (265 of 629 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.95 · 36.4% (271 of 744 decks)
- Bumi, Unleashed relevance 1.95 · 25.6% (762 of 2,976 decks)
- Ashaya's Enduring Bond relevance 1.60 · 22.0% (363 of 1,650 decks)
- Toph, Greatest Earthbender relevance 1.60 · 21.9% (364 of 1,659 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 1.59 · 29.9% (148 of 495 decks)
- Faldorn, Dread Wolf Herald relevance 1.36 · 15.6% (424 of 2,715 decks)
- Toph, Hardheaded Teacher relevance 1.31 · 13.6% (588 of 4,334 decks)
- Strider, Ranger of the North relevance 1.12 · 39.6% (21 of 53 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.96 · 45.8% (11 of 24 decks)
- Nikya of the Old Ways relevance 0.81 · 9.0% (160 of 1,772 decks)
- The Lady of Otaria relevance 0.70 · 11.6% (42 of 362 decks)
- Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.69 · 12.0% (36 of 299 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.68 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.63 · 17.3% (13 of 75 decks)
- Livonya Silone relevance 0.62 · 30.0% (6 of 20 decks)
- Klothys, God of Destiny relevance 0.54 · 6.6% (69 of 1,041 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.49 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Street Urchin relevance 0.49 · 6.3% (53 of 840 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.44 · 4.1% (149 of 3,630 decks)
- Minsc & Boo, Timeless Heroes relevance 0.37 · 3.3% (150 of 4,515 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.36 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.40 · 49.1% (6,637 of 13,530 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.38 · 44.9% (6,076 of 13,530 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.38 · 46.9% (6,340 of 13,530 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.34 · 51.7% (6,993 of 13,530 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.31 · 42.5% (5,751 of 13,530 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.22 · 54.0% (7,309 of 13,530 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.21 · 43.4% (5,876 of 13,530 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.17 · 38.3% (5,183 of 13,530 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.14 · 38.8% (5,246 of 13,530 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.09 · 31.1% (4,211 of 13,530 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.08 · 46.9% (6,345 of 13,530 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.03 · 45.4% (6,149 of 13,530 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.02 · 31.2% (4,218 of 13,530 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.99 · 30.8% (4,170 of 13,530 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.98 · 27.7% (3,754 of 13,530 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.90 · 32.4% (4,380 of 13,530 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.90 · 29.5% (3,993 of 13,530 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.89 · 29.5% (3,996 of 13,530 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.89 · 38.9% (5,257 of 13,530 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.89 · 30.0% (4,056 of 13,530 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.86 · 35.7% (4,830 of 13,530 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.84 · 22.4% (3,031 of 13,530 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.84 · 26.8% (3,632 of 13,530 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.83 · 26.4% (3,573 of 13,530 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.83 · 29.3% (3,958 of 13,530 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.83 · 28.0% (3,792 of 13,530 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.81 · 26.7% (3,615 of 13,530 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.80 · 26.0% (3,520 of 13,530 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.77 · 20.5% (2,780 of 13,530 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.76 · 23.1% (3,124 of 13,530 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.40 · 49.1% (6,637 of 13,530 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.38 · 44.9% (6,076 of 13,530 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.38 · 46.9% (6,340 of 13,530 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.31 · 42.5% (5,751 of 13,530 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.22 · 54.0% (7,309 of 13,530 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.21 · 43.4% (5,876 of 13,530 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.17 · 38.3% (5,183 of 13,530 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.14 · 38.8% (5,246 of 13,530 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.08 · 46.9% (6,345 of 13,530 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.90 · 32.4% (4,380 of 13,530 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.90 · 29.5% (3,993 of 13,530 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.89 · 30.0% (4,056 of 13,530 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.84 · 22.4% (3,031 of 13,530 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.83 · 26.4% (3,573 of 13,530 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.83 · 29.3% (3,958 of 13,530 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.83 · 28.0% (3,792 of 13,530 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.81 · 26.7% (3,615 of 13,530 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.77 · 20.5% (2,780 of 13,530 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.76 · 23.6% (3,188 of 13,530 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.72 · 32.2% (4,351 of 13,530 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.72 · 21.3% (2,888 of 13,530 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.72 · 20.0% (2,700 of 13,530 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.71 · 18.8% (2,546 of 13,530 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.71 · 31.3% (4,233 of 13,530 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.68 · 20.3% (2,745 of 13,530 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 0.67 · 18.6% (2,513 of 13,530 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.67 · 21.7% (2,931 of 13,530 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.66 · 18.4% (2,493 of 13,530 decks)
- Spitfire Lagac relevance 0.65 · 18.0% (2,430 of 13,530 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.65 · 18.2% (2,457 of 13,530 decks)
- Zell Dincht relevance 0.63 · 16.2% (2,195 of 13,530 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.09 · 31.1% (4,211 of 13,530 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.99 · 30.8% (4,170 of 13,530 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.71 · 20.3% (2,748 of 13,530 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Exploration relevance 1.34 · 51.7% (6,993 of 13,530 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.89 · 29.5% (3,996 of 13,530 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.84 · 26.8% (3,632 of 13,530 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.76 · 23.1% (3,124 of 13,530 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 1.03 · 45.4% (6,149 of 13,530 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.89 · 38.9% (5,257 of 13,530 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.86 · 35.7% (4,830 of 13,530 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.80 · 26.0% (3,520 of 13,530 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.02 · 31.2% (4,218 of 13,530 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.98 · 27.7% (3,754 of 13,530 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.67 · 19.7% (2,665 of 13,530 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.69 · 18.6% (2,517 of 13,530 decks)
All lands (4)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.86 · 45.3% (6,132 of 13,530 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.68 · 37.7% (5,102 of 13,530 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.65 · 42.5% (5,745 of 13,530 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.64 · 19.6% (2,652 of 13,530 decks)
EDH data for Azusa, Lost but Seeking: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 13,530 real decks.