Color Identity Spread
2.6% Bant
3030+26+3+5+2+6+1+7+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Isu the Abominable relevance 3.01 · 32.5% (403 of 1,240 decks)
- Choco, Seeker of Paradise relevance 2.45 · 12.4% (1,366 of 11,029 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 1.68 · 8.3% (415 of 5,027 decks)
- Amareth, the Lustrous relevance 1.51 · 11.6% (96 of 831 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful relevance 1.05 · 20.4% (11 of 54 decks)
- Leela, Sevateem Warrior // The Second Doctor relevance 0.89 · 7.5% (28 of 373 decks)
- Captain Kirk, Boldly Going relevance 0.89 · 12.9% (12 of 93 decks)
- Shanna, Purifying Blade relevance 0.80 · 4.7% (51 of 1,074 decks)
- Mr. Foxglove relevance 0.79 · 3.5% (113 of 3,239 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.73 · 7.1% (16 of 226 decks)
- Ms. Bumbleflower relevance 0.72 · 2.1% (519 of 25,168 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Jo Grant relevance 0.69 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- Yuna, Grand Summoner relevance 0.64 · 2.2% (195 of 8,797 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful relevance 0.59 · 2.6% (74 of 2,818 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Radiant, Serra Archangel relevance 0.56 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Rigo, Streetwise Mentor relevance 0.54 · 3.4% (25 of 732 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Aang, at the Crossroads // Aang, Destined Savior relevance 0.52 · 2.0% (101 of 5,081 decks)
- Angus Mackenzie relevance 0.51 · 3.0% (27 of 887 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Prava of the Steel Legion relevance 0.50 · 7.1% (6 of 85 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.49 · 4.5% (11 of 242 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Tegan Jovanka relevance 0.48 · 22.2% (2 of 9 decks)
- Katilda and Lier relevance 0.48 · 2.9% (24 of 818 decks)
- Helga, Skittish Seer relevance 0.47 · 1.5% (184 of 12,435 decks)
- Falco Spara, Pactweaver relevance 0.46 · 2.2% (44 of 2,014 decks)
- Vv'viza, Orbital Overseer relevance 0.45 · 11.1% (3 of 27 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen, Mercenary relevance 0.44 · 3.2% (15 of 466 decks)
- Morska, Undersea Sleuth relevance 0.42 · 1.7% (69 of 4,132 decks)
- Galadriel, Light of Valinor relevance 0.41 · 1.4% (143 of 10,529 decks)
- Rubinia Soulsinger relevance 0.40 · 2.7% (17 of 634 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Exploration relevance 1.04 · 31.8% (1,482 of 4,655 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.96 · 34.8% (1,622 of 4,655 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.94 · 31.9% (1,483 of 4,655 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.87 · 24.3% (1,130 of 4,655 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.85 · 23.7% (1,103 of 4,655 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.84 · 29.4% (1,369 of 4,655 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.83 · 22.1% (1,029 of 4,655 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.81 · 27.1% (1,261 of 4,655 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.79 · 26.0% (1,208 of 4,655 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.76 · 20.6% (960 of 4,655 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.72 · 23.8% (1,108 of 4,655 decks)
- Sidequest: Raise a Chocobo // Black Chocobo relevance 0.72 · 23.9% (1,112 of 4,655 decks)
- Ambrosia Whiteheart relevance 0.72 · 23.3% (1,083 of 4,655 decks)
- Bartz and Boko relevance 0.70 · 23.3% (1,086 of 4,655 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.70 · 22.9% (1,064 of 4,655 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.66 · 23.0% (1,071 of 4,655 decks)
- Kastral, the Windcrested relevance 0.65 · 22.6% (1,052 of 4,655 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.64 · 15.3% (713 of 4,655 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.62 · 12.1% (565 of 4,655 decks)
- Summon: Fat Chocobo relevance 0.62 · 19.3% (900 of 4,655 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.60 · 14.0% (653 of 4,655 decks)
- Murmuration relevance 0.57 · 18.4% (858 of 4,655 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.55 · 10.8% (502 of 4,655 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.54 · 11.7% (546 of 4,655 decks)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (712 of 4,655 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.54 · 24.9% (1,160 of 4,655 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.52 · 20.8% (968 of 4,655 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.51 · 11.0% (511 of 4,655 decks)
- Gysahl Greens relevance 0.50 · 14.0% (653 of 4,655 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (433 of 4,655 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.96 · 34.8% (1,622 of 4,655 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.94 · 31.9% (1,483 of 4,655 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.87 · 24.3% (1,130 of 4,655 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.85 · 23.7% (1,103 of 4,655 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.84 · 29.4% (1,369 of 4,655 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.83 · 22.1% (1,029 of 4,655 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.79 · 26.0% (1,208 of 4,655 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.76 · 20.6% (960 of 4,655 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.72 · 23.8% (1,108 of 4,655 decks)
- Sidequest: Raise a Chocobo // Black Chocobo relevance 0.72 · 23.9% (1,112 of 4,655 decks)
- Ambrosia Whiteheart relevance 0.72 · 23.3% (1,083 of 4,655 decks)
- Bartz and Boko relevance 0.70 · 23.3% (1,086 of 4,655 decks)
- Sazh Katzroy relevance 0.70 · 22.9% (1,064 of 4,655 decks)
- Kastral, the Windcrested relevance 0.65 · 22.6% (1,052 of 4,655 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.64 · 15.3% (713 of 4,655 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.62 · 12.1% (565 of 4,655 decks)
- Summon: Fat Chocobo relevance 0.62 · 19.3% (900 of 4,655 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.60 · 14.0% (653 of 4,655 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.54 · 11.7% (546 of 4,655 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.52 · 20.8% (968 of 4,655 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.51 · 11.0% (511 of 4,655 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (433 of 4,655 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.48 · 12.5% (581 of 4,655 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.45 · 12.1% (563 of 4,655 decks)
- Empyrean Eagle relevance 0.45 · 14.0% (652 of 4,655 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (497 of 4,655 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.81 · 27.1% (1,261 of 4,655 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.55 · 10.8% (502 of 4,655 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.49 · 10.5% (487 of 4,655 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Exploration relevance 1.04 · 31.8% (1,482 of 4,655 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.66 · 23.0% (1,071 of 4,655 decks)
- Murmuration relevance 0.57 · 18.4% (858 of 4,655 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.48 · 13.9% (648 of 4,655 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.44 · 12.1% (561 of 4,655 decks)
All instants (2)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.54 · 24.9% (1,160 of 4,655 decks)
- Dazzling Denial relevance 0.44 · 13.4% (626 of 4,655 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Chocobo Kick relevance 0.54 · 15.3% (712 of 4,655 decks)
- Gysahl Greens relevance 0.50 · 14.0% (653 of 4,655 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.49 · 24.6% (1,144 of 4,655 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.47 · 33.5% (1,561 of 4,655 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.45 · 14.9% (693 of 4,655 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.44 · 27.6% (1,287 of 4,655 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Chocobo Camp relevance 0.60 · 17.3% (807 of 4,655 decks)
All lands (7)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.54 · 25.3% (1,176 of 4,655 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.51 · 23.0% (1,069 of 4,655 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.46 · 19.9% (925 of 4,655 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.45 · 20.0% (929 of 4,655 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.44 · 23.1% (1,076 of 4,655 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (559 of 4,655 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.44 · 31.3% (1,458 of 4,655 decks)
EDH data for Azusa, Lost but Seeking: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,655 real decks.














































































