Color Identity Spread
13.2% Simic
3030+27+2+5+4+4+4+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.26 · 65.3% (6,029 of 9,235 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.62 · 51.4% (2,430 of 4,724 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 2.23 · 36.3% (2,568 of 7,067 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.06 · 51.6% (454 of 879 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 1.98 · 34.5% (1,287 of 3,728 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 1.93 · 38.4% (738 of 1,921 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 1.87 · 41.0% (497 of 1,213 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 1.73 · 43.3% (267 of 616 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.70 · 24.5% (1,715 of 7,006 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 1.57 · 36.9% (243 of 659 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 1.51 · 32.1% (298 of 928 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 1.51 · 35.9% (209 of 582 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.44 · 28.5% (328 of 1,151 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.38 · 26.5% (317 of 1,196 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.36 · 28.0% (249 of 889 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 1.25 · 23.3% (276 of 1,185 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 1.20 · 26.3% (152 of 578 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 1.08 · 18.3% (281 of 1,535 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 0.99 · 16.2% (260 of 1,601 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.97 · 22.6% (85 of 376 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.95 · 47.4% (18 of 38 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.92 · 22.1% (71 of 321 decks)
- Kruphix, God of Horizons relevance 0.84 · 12.4% (293 of 2,365 decks)
- Mikey & Don, Party Planners relevance 0.81 · 15.2% (117 of 769 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.79 · 10.5% (403 of 3,834 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.65 · 11.0% (116 of 1,058 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Eligeth, Crossroads Augur relevance 0.63 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
- Ignis Scientia relevance 0.54 · 15.9% (21 of 132 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.47 · 6.3% (193 of 3,082 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.46 · 23.3% (7 of 30 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 51.6% (11,890 of 23,053 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.17 · 52.2% (12,027 of 23,053 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.17 · 42.1% (9,697 of 23,053 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.12 · 42.7% (9,833 of 23,053 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.12 · 43.4% (10,008 of 23,053 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.08 · 40.5% (9,332 of 23,053 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.05 · 54.9% (12,645 of 23,053 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.93 · 43.4% (10,004 of 23,053 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.86 · 41.1% (9,484 of 23,053 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.86 · 31.7% (7,302 of 23,053 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.86 · 62.4% (14,386 of 23,053 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.86 · 31.3% (7,219 of 23,053 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.82 · 27.3% (6,297 of 23,053 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.82 · 40.3% (9,287 of 23,053 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.82 · 35.2% (8,111 of 23,053 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.81 · 42.8% (9,872 of 23,053 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 23.2% (5,356 of 23,053 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.78 · 35.1% (8,100 of 23,053 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 24.5% (5,653 of 23,053 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (5,094 of 23,053 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.72 · 27.4% (6,310 of 23,053 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.68 · 24.4% (5,628 of 23,053 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.68 · 20.3% (4,687 of 23,053 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.64 · 33.2% (7,648 of 23,053 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (4,318 of 23,053 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.63 · 24.1% (5,560 of 23,053 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.62 · 20.5% (4,716 of 23,053 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.62 · 16.8% (3,865 of 23,053 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.62 · 35.5% (8,173 of 23,053 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.61 · 16.9% (3,900 of 23,053 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 51.6% (11,890 of 23,053 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.17 · 42.1% (9,697 of 23,053 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.12 · 42.7% (9,833 of 23,053 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.12 · 43.4% (10,008 of 23,053 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.08 · 40.5% (9,332 of 23,053 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.05 · 54.9% (12,645 of 23,053 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.93 · 43.4% (10,004 of 23,053 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.86 · 41.1% (9,484 of 23,053 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.86 · 31.7% (7,302 of 23,053 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.86 · 62.4% (14,386 of 23,053 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.82 · 27.3% (6,297 of 23,053 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.82 · 40.3% (9,287 of 23,053 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.81 · 42.8% (9,872 of 23,053 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 24.5% (5,653 of 23,053 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.68 · 24.4% (5,628 of 23,053 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.68 · 20.3% (4,687 of 23,053 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.64 · 33.2% (7,648 of 23,053 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Scout relevance 0.64 · 18.7% (4,318 of 23,053 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.62 · 20.5% (4,716 of 23,053 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.62 · 16.8% (3,865 of 23,053 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.61 · 16.9% (3,900 of 23,053 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.58 · 16.1% (3,722 of 23,053 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.56 · 14.9% (3,428 of 23,053 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.56 · 29.9% (6,902 of 23,053 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.53 · 17.0% (3,910 of 23,053 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.51 · 19.5% (4,489 of 23,053 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.50 · 13.7% (3,157 of 23,053 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.81 · 23.2% (5,356 of 23,053 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (5,094 of 23,053 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Exploration relevance 1.17 · 52.2% (12,027 of 23,053 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.86 · 31.3% (7,219 of 23,053 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.72 · 27.4% (6,310 of 23,053 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.57 · 18.4% (4,231 of 23,053 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.51 · 14.4% (3,309 of 23,053 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 0.82 · 35.2% (8,111 of 23,053 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.78 · 35.1% (8,100 of 23,053 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.63 · 24.1% (5,560 of 23,053 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.50 · 31.3% (7,209 of 23,053 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Explore relevance 0.62 · 35.5% (8,173 of 23,053 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.60 · 15.7% (3,612 of 23,053 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.55 · 43.5% (10,026 of 23,053 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.51 · 13.5% (3,103 of 23,053 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.64 · 19.6% (4,515 of 23,053 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.60 · 34.6% (7,974 of 23,053 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.57 · 15.3% (3,530 of 23,053 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.51 · 27.4% (6,310 of 23,053 decks)
All lands (4)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.68 · 42.1% (9,703 of 23,053 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.66 · 41.4% (9,549 of 23,053 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.63 · 37.9% (8,738 of 23,053 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.56 · 44.7% (10,309 of 23,053 decks)
EDH data for Azusa, Lost but Seeking: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 23,053 real decks.







































































