Hour of Promise
Played in 652 Abzan decks
530+18+5+3+3+7+7+7+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
The Necrobloom 3.8% of decks
The Necrobloom 3.8% of decks
Thalia and The Gitrog Monster 1.2% of decks
Thalia and The Gitrog Monster 1.2% of decks
Ravos, Soultender // Kodama of the East Tree 3.2% of decks
Ravos, Soultender // Kodama of the East Tree 3.2% of decks
Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools 4.7% of decks
Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools 4.7% of decks
Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Tymna the Weaver 3.7% of decks
Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Tymna the Weaver 3.7% of decks
Most Relevant
The Gitrog Monster 55.4% of decks
The Gitrog Monster 55.4% of decks
Crop Rotation 54.3% of decks
Crop Rotation 54.3% of decks
Wight of the Reliquary 52.3% of decks
Wight of the Reliquary 52.3% of decks
Sylvan Scrying 30.5% of decks
Sylvan Scrying 30.5% of decks
Scute Swarm 47.9% of decks
Scute Swarm 47.9% of decks
Splendid Reclamation 37.9% of decks
Splendid Reclamation 37.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- The Necrobloom relevance 2.65 · 3.8% (451 of 11,798 decks)
- Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.07 · 1.2% (72 of 6,153 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.79 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.65 · 4.7% (3 of 64 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Tymna the Weaver relevance 0.30 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.36 · 55.4% (361 of 652 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.28 · 54.3% (354 of 652 decks)
- Wight of the Reliquary relevance 1.25 · 52.3% (341 of 652 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.21 · 30.5% (199 of 652 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.20 · 47.9% (312 of 652 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.12 · 37.9% (247 of 652 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.12 · 42.3% (276 of 652 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.11 · 41.1% (268 of 652 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.10 · 35.0% (228 of 652 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.10 · 33.4% (218 of 652 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.05 · 35.9% (234 of 652 decks)
- Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.05 · 38.0% (248 of 652 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 1.04 · 35.7% (233 of 652 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.00 · 36.7% (239 of 652 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.00 · 28.5% (186 of 652 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.97 · 31.1% (203 of 652 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.97 · 41.9% (273 of 652 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.96 · 37.9% (247 of 652 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.94 · 27.3% (178 of 652 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.89 · 32.1% (209 of 652 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.89 · 33.1% (216 of 652 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.88 · 31.1% (203 of 652 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.88 · 37.3% (243 of 652 decks)
- Six relevance 0.87 · 38.8% (253 of 652 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.87 · 21.2% (138 of 652 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.86 · 36.7% (239 of 652 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.85 · 29.3% (191 of 652 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.84 · 20.1% (131 of 652 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.81 · 20.1% (131 of 652 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.80 · 17.5% (114 of 652 decks)
All creatures (18)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.36 · 55.4% (361 of 652 decks)
- Wight of the Reliquary relevance 1.25 · 52.3% (341 of 652 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.20 · 47.9% (312 of 652 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.12 · 42.3% (276 of 652 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.11 · 41.1% (268 of 652 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.10 · 35.0% (228 of 652 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.05 · 35.9% (234 of 652 decks)
- Thalia and The Gitrog Monster relevance 1.05 · 38.0% (248 of 652 decks)
- Knight of the Reliquary relevance 1.04 · 35.7% (233 of 652 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.00 · 36.7% (239 of 652 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.00 · 28.5% (186 of 652 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.97 · 31.1% (203 of 652 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.97 · 41.9% (273 of 652 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.89 · 33.1% (216 of 652 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.88 · 37.3% (243 of 652 decks)
- Six relevance 0.87 · 38.8% (253 of 652 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.86 · 36.7% (239 of 652 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.76 · 22.4% (146 of 652 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.88 · 31.1% (203 of 652 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.81 · 20.1% (131 of 652 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.79 · 24.2% (158 of 652 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.79 · 24.5% (160 of 652 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.77 · 24.5% (160 of 652 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Spelunking relevance 1.10 · 33.4% (218 of 652 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.89 · 32.1% (209 of 652 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.79 · 32.5% (212 of 652 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.28 · 54.3% (354 of 652 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.85 · 29.3% (191 of 652 decks)
- Realms Uncharted relevance 0.84 · 20.1% (131 of 652 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.21 · 30.5% (199 of 652 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.12 · 37.9% (247 of 652 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.96 · 37.9% (247 of 652 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.94 · 27.3% (178 of 652 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.87 · 21.2% (138 of 652 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.80 · 17.5% (114 of 652 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.75 · 22.2% (145 of 652 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.48 · 56.1% (366 of 652 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.45 · 42.2% (275 of 652 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 1.32 · 39.6% (258 of 652 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.77 · 31.7% (207 of 652 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.77 · 21.0% (137 of 652 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.77 · 21.2% (138 of 652 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.74 · 20.2% (132 of 652 decks)
All lands (7)
- Vesuva relevance 1.22 · 32.4% (211 of 652 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 1.17 · 39.4% (257 of 652 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 1.12 · 36.8% (240 of 652 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 1.03 · 33.9% (221 of 652 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.99 · 26.7% (174 of 652 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.97 · 22.7% (148 of 652 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.76 · 35.4% (231 of 652 decks)
EDH data for Hour of Promise: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 652 real decks.














































