Hour of Promise
Played in 5,598 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (10)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 5.08 · 65.8% (2,836 of 4,310 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 4.73 · 58.3% (2,147 of 3,682 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.25 · 7.5% (98 of 1,314 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 1.18 · 10.3% (38 of 368 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 1.09 · 5.2% (131 of 2,518 decks)
- Samut, the Driving Force relevance 0.30 · 1.4% (29 of 2,081 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.21 · 3.9% (2 of 51 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.05 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.05 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (26)
- Map the Frontier relevance 2.88 · 81.9% (4,584 of 5,598 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 2.81 · 86.9% (4,865 of 5,598 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 2.73 · 73.6% (4,118 of 5,598 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 2.50 · 67.0% (3,748 of 5,598 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.19 · 65.7% (3,679 of 5,598 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.12 · 65.3% (3,655 of 5,598 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.11 · 64.2% (3,593 of 5,598 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.03 · 57.1% (3,198 of 5,598 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 2.01 · 46.8% (2,618 of 5,598 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.96 · 50.2% (2,809 of 5,598 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 1.82 · 43.5% (2,436 of 5,598 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.78 · 43.6% (2,438 of 5,598 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 1.76 · 42.3% (2,370 of 5,598 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.63 · 38.7% (2,169 of 5,598 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 1.59 · 36.4% (2,036 of 5,598 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.56 · 59.2% (3,313 of 5,598 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.54 · 48.1% (2,692 of 5,598 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.52 · 42.2% (2,360 of 5,598 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.49 · 57.1% (3,197 of 5,598 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.48 · 52.9% (2,959 of 5,598 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.45 · 36.5% (2,043 of 5,598 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 1.43 · 31.9% (1,788 of 5,598 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 1.42 · 32.0% (1,793 of 5,598 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.42 · 31.0% (1,733 of 5,598 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.40 · 60.3% (3,376 of 5,598 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.39 · 46.4% (2,597 of 5,598 decks)
All creatures (16)
- Dune Chanter relevance 2.81 · 86.9% (4,865 of 5,598 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 2.73 · 73.6% (4,118 of 5,598 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.19 · 65.7% (3,679 of 5,598 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.12 · 65.3% (3,655 of 5,598 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.11 · 64.2% (3,593 of 5,598 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.03 · 57.1% (3,198 of 5,598 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.78 · 43.6% (2,438 of 5,598 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 1.76 · 42.3% (2,370 of 5,598 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.63 · 38.7% (2,169 of 5,598 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.54 · 48.1% (2,692 of 5,598 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.52 · 42.2% (2,360 of 5,598 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.48 · 52.9% (2,959 of 5,598 decks)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 1.43 · 31.9% (1,788 of 5,598 decks)
- Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 1.42 · 31.0% (1,733 of 5,598 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.40 · 60.3% (3,376 of 5,598 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.39 · 46.4% (2,597 of 5,598 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.49 · 57.1% (3,197 of 5,598 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Desert Warfare relevance 2.50 · 67.0% (3,748 of 5,598 decks)
All instants (1)
- Harrow relevance 1.56 · 59.2% (3,313 of 5,598 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Map the Frontier relevance 2.88 · 81.9% (4,584 of 5,598 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 2.01 · 46.8% (2,618 of 5,598 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.96 · 50.2% (2,809 of 5,598 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 1.82 · 43.5% (2,436 of 5,598 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 1.59 · 36.4% (2,036 of 5,598 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.45 · 36.5% (2,043 of 5,598 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 1.42 · 32.0% (1,793 of 5,598 decks)
All utility lands (18)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 3.02 · 88.9% (4,975 of 5,598 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 3.02 · 86.4% (4,839 of 5,598 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 3.01 · 88.2% (4,935 of 5,598 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 3.01 · 87.9% (4,922 of 5,598 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 3.00 · 88.8% (4,970 of 5,598 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 3.00 · 88.5% (4,954 of 5,598 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 2.99 · 88.1% (4,930 of 5,598 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 2.79 · 80.2% (4,488 of 5,598 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 2.70 · 77.9% (4,360 of 5,598 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 2.18 · 59.4% (3,324 of 5,598 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 1.86 · 46.1% (2,579 of 5,598 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 1.82 · 43.8% (2,452 of 5,598 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 1.80 · 81.0% (4,533 of 5,598 decks)
- Desert relevance 1.76 · 44.5% (2,491 of 5,598 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 1.75 · 42.3% (2,368 of 5,598 decks)
- Cradle of the Accursed relevance 1.73 · 40.5% (2,265 of 5,598 decks)
- Sandstorm Verge relevance 1.70 · 41.1% (2,300 of 5,598 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.66 · 46.0% (2,575 of 5,598 decks)
All lands (6)
- Creosote Heath relevance 2.74 · 86.6% (4,846 of 5,598 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 2.74 · 86.6% (4,848 of 5,598 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 2.72 · 85.5% (4,785 of 5,598 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 2.67 · 76.1% (4,258 of 5,598 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 2.61 · 70.9% (3,971 of 5,598 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 2.09 · 54.9% (3,074 of 5,598 decks)
EDH data for Hour of Promise: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,598 real decks.