Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.57 · 41.4% (1,548 of 3,742 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 2.51 · 43.8% (1,090 of 2,490 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 2.47 · 52.8% (561 of 1,063 decks)
- Sasaya, Orochi Ascendant // Sasaya's Essence relevance 2.46 · 58.3% (424 of 727 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 2.21 · 56.6% (245 of 433 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 2.16 · 41.4% (483 of 1,168 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 2.11 · 43.8% (354 of 809 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 2.10 · 35.7% (611 of 1,712 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 1.73 · 29.6% (329 of 1,110 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 1.57 · 36.0% (117 of 325 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 1.48 · 31.1% (124 of 399 decks)
- Michelangelo, On the Scene relevance 1.47 · 37.9% (78 of 206 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.47 · 15.9% (1,007 of 6,322 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 1.46 · 26.9% (170 of 633 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 1.42 · 32.6% (93 of 285 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 1.40 · 23.6% (195 of 827 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 1.37 · 13.3% (1,363 of 10,257 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 1.34 · 35.5% (60 of 169 decks)
- Six relevance 1.33 · 18.0% (347 of 1,929 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 1.27 · 13.7% (704 of 5,139 decks)
- Fblthp, Knows the Way relevance 1.22 · 40.2% (33 of 82 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 1.20 · 13.5% (532 of 3,951 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 1.17 · 28.6% (53 of 185 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 1.13 · 29.2% (45 of 154 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 1.12 · 12.0% (532 of 4,438 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.11 · 17.1% (146 of 852 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 1.05 · 17.2% (110 of 640 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.03 · 14.1% (188 of 1,334 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.99 · 28.2% (29 of 103 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.96 · 14.0% (137 of 982 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.91 · 38.8% (6,017 of 15,520 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.91 · 45.5% (7,058 of 15,520 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.88 · 43.0% (6,669 of 15,520 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.87 · 43.0% (6,678 of 15,520 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.86 · 45.1% (6,992 of 15,520 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.82 · 42.8% (6,650 of 15,520 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.82 · 42.9% (6,652 of 15,520 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.76 · 37.8% (5,867 of 15,520 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.72 · 34.9% (5,416 of 15,520 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.72 · 38.3% (5,941 of 15,520 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.71 · 28.7% (4,453 of 15,520 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.70 · 38.6% (5,998 of 15,520 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.70 · 36.5% (5,666 of 15,520 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.67 · 23.1% (3,578 of 15,520 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.65 · 29.0% (4,505 of 15,520 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.65 · 28.8% (4,464 of 15,520 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.64 · 19.5% (3,024 of 15,520 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.64 · 19.8% (3,077 of 15,520 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.63 · 34.5% (5,347 of 15,520 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.63 · 26.5% (4,108 of 15,520 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.62 · 23.7% (3,673 of 15,520 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.60 · 23.6% (3,668 of 15,520 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.60 · 29.1% (4,521 of 15,520 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (2,990 of 15,520 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.57 · 22.1% (3,425 of 15,520 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.55 · 18.5% (2,873 of 15,520 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.54 · 32.0% (4,964 of 15,520 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.54 · 21.2% (3,294 of 15,520 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.54 · 16.5% (2,563 of 15,520 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.53 · 18.0% (2,786 of 15,520 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.91 · 38.8% (6,017 of 15,520 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.91 · 45.5% (7,058 of 15,520 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.88 · 43.0% (6,669 of 15,520 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.87 · 43.0% (6,678 of 15,520 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.86 · 45.1% (6,992 of 15,520 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.82 · 42.8% (6,650 of 15,520 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.82 · 42.9% (6,652 of 15,520 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.76 · 37.8% (5,867 of 15,520 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.72 · 34.9% (5,416 of 15,520 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.71 · 28.7% (4,453 of 15,520 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.70 · 36.5% (5,666 of 15,520 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.67 · 23.1% (3,578 of 15,520 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.65 · 29.0% (4,505 of 15,520 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.65 · 28.8% (4,464 of 15,520 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.64 · 19.5% (3,024 of 15,520 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.63 · 26.5% (4,108 of 15,520 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.60 · 23.6% (3,668 of 15,520 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.59 · 19.3% (2,990 of 15,520 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.57 · 22.1% (3,425 of 15,520 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.54 · 21.2% (3,294 of 15,520 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.54 · 16.5% (2,563 of 15,520 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.52 · 15.7% (2,436 of 15,520 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.52 · 22.7% (3,529 of 15,520 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.51 · 17.4% (2,697 of 15,520 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.51 · 17.0% (2,633 of 15,520 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.50 · 18.3% (2,837 of 15,520 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.49 · 30.0% (4,662 of 15,520 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.49 · 32.5% (5,048 of 15,520 decks)
- Six relevance 0.47 · 17.0% (2,638 of 15,520 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.62 · 23.7% (3,673 of 15,520 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.55 · 18.5% (2,873 of 15,520 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.49 · 17.6% (2,730 of 15,520 decks)
- Horn of Greed relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (2,050 of 15,520 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Exploration relevance 0.72 · 38.3% (5,941 of 15,520 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.64 · 19.8% (3,077 of 15,520 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.52 · 18.4% (2,859 of 15,520 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.49 · 18.8% (2,912 of 15,520 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.48 · 15.1% (2,338 of 15,520 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 0.70 · 38.6% (5,998 of 15,520 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.63 · 34.5% (5,347 of 15,520 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.54 · 32.0% (4,964 of 15,520 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.51 · 19.0% (2,954 of 15,520 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.53 · 18.0% (2,786 of 15,520 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.53 · 31.9% (4,945 of 15,520 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.50 · 17.7% (2,748 of 15,520 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.60 · 29.1% (4,521 of 15,520 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.50 · 30.3% (4,702 of 15,520 decks)
All lands (3)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.66 · 34.4% (5,334 of 15,520 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.64 · 33.8% (5,253 of 15,520 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.62 · 30.7% (4,764 of 15,520 decks)
EDH data for Cultivator Colossus: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 15,520 real decks.