Crucible of Worlds
Played in 4,996 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
4.2% Naya
-
Jund 16,332 · 13.6%
-
Sultai 12,654 · 10.6%
-
Green 10,116 · 8.4%
-
Simic 6,932 · 5.8%
-
Abzan 6,450 · 5.4%
-
Golgari 6,391 · 5.3%
-
Gruul 6,055 · 5.1%
-
Grixis 5,851 · 4.9%
-
Naya 4,996 · 4.2%
-
Five-Color 4,860 · 4.1%
-
Temur 4,572 · 3.8%
-
Ink-Treader 3,814 · 3.2%
-
Boros 3,773 · 3.2%
-
Black 3,769 · 3.1%
-
Red 3,122 · 2.6%
- Other (17) 20,032 · 16.7%
1530+19+3+3+3+4+11+7+
That's every commander.
All commanders (15)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.26 · 24.1% (887 of 3,682 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.99 · 19.5% (841 of 4,310 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.42 · 17.1% (310 of 1,812 decks)
- Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 2.28 · 7.9% (2,120 of 26,803 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.92 · 12.9% (169 of 1,314 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 1.89 · 19.3% (71 of 368 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.55 · 24.5% (24 of 98 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.76 · 3.1% (78 of 2,518 decks)
- Eivor, Wolf-Kissed relevance 0.64 · 3.5% (29 of 831 decks)
- Dogmeat, Ever Loyal relevance 0.58 · 1.9% (104 of 5,351 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (5 of 113 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.38 · 5.2% (4 of 77 decks)
- Preston Garvey, Minuteman relevance 0.19 · 1.0% (11 of 1,048 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (2 of 98 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.06 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.72 · 53.9% (2,691 of 4,996 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.54 · 47.2% (2,359 of 4,996 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.52 · 42.8% (2,136 of 4,996 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.50 · 47.7% (2,384 of 4,996 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.49 · 54.8% (2,736 of 4,996 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.46 · 56.7% (2,835 of 4,996 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.44 · 55.4% (2,768 of 4,996 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.37 · 35.8% (1,787 of 4,996 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.29 · 35.9% (1,796 of 4,996 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.28 · 34.8% (1,738 of 4,996 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.25 · 50.6% (2,527 of 4,996 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.21 · 52.3% (2,612 of 4,996 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.17 · 35.6% (1,779 of 4,996 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.16 · 39.9% (1,992 of 4,996 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.15 · 33.7% (1,683 of 4,996 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.14 · 28.8% (1,437 of 4,996 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 34.0% (1,700 of 4,996 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.13 · 35.0% (1,750 of 4,996 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.11 · 49.4% (2,467 of 4,996 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.00 · 26.8% (1,341 of 4,996 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.99 · 35.3% (1,763 of 4,996 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.98 · 37.2% (1,860 of 4,996 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.95 · 36.3% (1,815 of 4,996 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.94 · 31.4% (1,571 of 4,996 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.93 · 28.1% (1,406 of 4,996 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.89 · 21.3% (1,065 of 4,996 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.88 · 30.9% (1,544 of 4,996 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.87 · 19.3% (964 of 4,996 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.86 · 22.0% (1,098 of 4,996 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.85 · 27.9% (1,393 of 4,996 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.72 · 53.9% (2,691 of 4,996 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.54 · 47.2% (2,359 of 4,996 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.52 · 42.8% (2,136 of 4,996 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.49 · 54.8% (2,736 of 4,996 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.46 · 56.7% (2,835 of 4,996 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.29 · 35.9% (1,796 of 4,996 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.21 · 52.3% (2,612 of 4,996 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.17 · 35.6% (1,779 of 4,996 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.16 · 39.9% (1,992 of 4,996 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 34.0% (1,700 of 4,996 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.13 · 35.0% (1,750 of 4,996 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.11 · 49.4% (2,467 of 4,996 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.99 · 35.3% (1,763 of 4,996 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.95 · 36.3% (1,815 of 4,996 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.94 · 31.4% (1,571 of 4,996 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.88 · 30.9% (1,544 of 4,996 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.85 · 27.9% (1,393 of 4,996 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 0.85 · 22.9% (1,144 of 4,996 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.85 · 20.6% (1,028 of 4,996 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.44 · 55.4% (2,768 of 4,996 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.28 · 34.8% (1,738 of 4,996 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 1.15 · 33.7% (1,683 of 4,996 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 1.50 · 47.7% (2,384 of 4,996 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.00 · 26.8% (1,341 of 4,996 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.93 · 28.1% (1,406 of 4,996 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.25 · 50.6% (2,527 of 4,996 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.98 · 37.2% (1,860 of 4,996 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.89 · 21.3% (1,065 of 4,996 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.37 · 35.8% (1,787 of 4,996 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.14 · 28.8% (1,437 of 4,996 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.87 · 19.3% (964 of 4,996 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.86 · 22.0% (1,098 of 4,996 decks)
All utility lands (11)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.18 · 35.7% (1,784 of 4,996 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.14 · 33.6% (1,681 of 4,996 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.13 · 33.2% (1,658 of 4,996 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.12 · 32.8% (1,638 of 4,996 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.12 · 33.0% (1,648 of 4,996 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.12 · 33.0% (1,647 of 4,996 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.10 · 32.0% (1,600 of 4,996 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.08 · 31.3% (1,562 of 4,996 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.07 · 30.8% (1,537 of 4,996 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.00 · 28.6% (1,427 of 4,996 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.99 · 27.1% (1,354 of 4,996 decks)
All lands (7)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.04 · 33.0% (1,647 of 4,996 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.04 · 32.8% (1,640 of 4,996 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.02 · 32.0% (1,601 of 4,996 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.97 · 28.5% (1,422 of 4,996 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.95 · 27.0% (1,351 of 4,996 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 0.89 · 24.3% (1,215 of 4,996 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.86 · 22.5% (1,124 of 4,996 decks)
EDH data for Crucible of Worlds: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,996 real decks.




































































