Colors Naya Remove filter: Colors Naya

Icetill Explorer

Played in 6,588 Naya decks

Icetill Explorer
$22.74 €23.91

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

25

Showing 1-10 of 25

Page size
All commanders (25)
  1. Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.79 · 40.2% (1,472 of 3,658 decks)
  2. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.30 · 29.2% (1,246 of 4,270 decks)
  3. Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 2.21 · 9.5% (2,528 of 26,575 decks)
  4. Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.04 · 17.3% (226 of 1,305 decks)
  5. Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.95 · 14.8% (265 of 1,793 decks)
  6. Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.73 · 34.0% (33 of 97 decks)
  7. Hazezon Tamar relevance 1.24 · 12.5% (45 of 360 decks)
  8. Eivor, Wolf-Kissed relevance 0.68 · 4.6% (38 of 823 decks)
  9. Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.68 · 3.4% (85 of 2,495 decks)
  10. Annie Flash, the Veteran relevance 0.55 · 4.3% (20 of 461 decks)
  11. Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 0.33 · 1.4% (73 of 5,305 decks)
  12. Ghired, Mirror of the Wilds relevance 0.20 · 1.0% (29 of 2,831 decks)
  13. Havi, the All-Father relevance 0.20 · 1.4% (12 of 861 decks)
  14. Samut, Voice of Dissent relevance 0.18 · 1.2% (12 of 998 decks)
  15. Johan relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (3 of 142 decks)
  16. Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.14 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
  17. Kodama of the East Tree // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (2 of 77 decks)
  18. Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.13 · 2.3% (2 of 88 decks)
  19. Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.12 · 1.6% (3 of 189 decks)
  20. Susan Foreman // The War Doctor relevance 0.11 · 1.5% (3 of 201 decks)
  21. Palladia-Mors relevance 0.10 · 1.8% (2 of 112 decks)
  22. Val, Marooned Surveyor relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
  23. Yoshimaru, Ever Faithful // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.08 · 1.3% (2 of 153 decks)
  24. Akiri, Line-Slinger // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.04 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
  25. Jacques le Vert relevance 0.04 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.43 44.9%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Dune Chanter
    1.43 44.2%
    $1.22 €0.72
  • Zuran Orb
    1.39 53.2%
    $3.69 €1.81
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.39 53.8%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.34 49.4%
    $9.97 €6.82
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.32 40.6%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.27 43.7%
    $7.21 €6.81
  • Desert Warfare
    1.25 33.6%
    $0.42 €0.56
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.19 33.5%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Tannuk, Memorial Ensign
    1.18 45.2%
    $1.14 €0.63
All most relevant (30)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.43 · 44.9% (2,957 of 6,588 decks)
  2. Dune Chanter relevance 1.43 · 44.2% (2,915 of 6,588 decks)
  3. Zuran Orb relevance 1.39 · 53.2% (3,506 of 6,588 decks)
  4. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.39 · 53.8% (3,546 of 6,588 decks)
  5. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.34 · 49.4% (3,255 of 6,588 decks)
  6. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.32 · 40.6% (2,675 of 6,588 decks)
  7. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.27 · 43.7% (2,881 of 6,588 decks)
  8. Desert Warfare relevance 1.25 · 33.6% (2,214 of 6,588 decks)
  9. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.19 · 33.5% (2,207 of 6,588 decks)
  10. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.18 · 45.2% (2,975 of 6,588 decks)
  11. Crop Rotation relevance 1.17 · 47.4% (3,120 of 6,588 decks)
  12. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.17 · 35.5% (2,339 of 6,588 decks)
  13. Scute Swarm relevance 1.16 · 50.0% (3,293 of 6,588 decks)
  14. Scapeshift relevance 1.15 · 30.0% (1,978 of 6,588 decks)
  15. Spelunking relevance 1.14 · 34.4% (2,265 of 6,588 decks)
  16. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 33.8% (2,230 of 6,588 decks)
  17. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.10 · 25.9% (1,704 of 6,588 decks)
  18. Exploration relevance 1.10 · 34.8% (2,292 of 6,588 decks)
  19. Sand Scout relevance 1.08 · 29.0% (1,910 of 6,588 decks)
  20. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.08 · 29.1% (1,919 of 6,588 decks)
  21. Map the Frontier relevance 1.06 · 30.2% (1,988 of 6,588 decks)
  22. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 27.0% (1,781 of 6,588 decks)
  23. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.04 · 46.3% (3,048 of 6,588 decks)
  24. Harrow relevance 1.03 · 39.1% (2,575 of 6,588 decks)
  25. Six relevance 1.00 · 23.8% (1,569 of 6,588 decks)
  26. Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.98 · 25.1% (1,656 of 6,588 decks)
  27. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.98 · 24.6% (1,621 of 6,588 decks)
  28. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.95 · 25.6% (1,689 of 6,588 decks)
  29. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.95 · 23.0% (1,518 of 6,588 decks)
  30. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.95 · 33.8% (2,225 of 6,588 decks)

Creatures

18

Showing 1-10 of 18

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    1.43 44.9%
    $12.26 €8.66
  • Dune Chanter
    1.43 44.2%
    $1.22 €0.72
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.39 53.8%
    $6.03 €6.51
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    1.34 49.4%
    $9.97 €6.82
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    1.32 40.6%
    $13.00 €9.99
  • Sylvan Safekeeper
    1.27 43.7%
    $7.21 €6.81
  • Ramunap Excavator
    1.19 33.5%
    $4.84 €3.63
  • Tannuk, Memorial Ensign
    1.18 45.2%
    $1.14 €0.63
  • Oracle of Mul Daya
    1.17 35.5%
    $2.02 €2.66
  • Scute Swarm
    1.16 50.0%
    $8.53 €7.58
All creatures (18)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.43 · 44.9% (2,957 of 6,588 decks)
  2. Dune Chanter relevance 1.43 · 44.2% (2,915 of 6,588 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.39 · 53.8% (3,546 of 6,588 decks)
  4. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.34 · 49.4% (3,255 of 6,588 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.32 · 40.6% (2,675 of 6,588 decks)
  6. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.27 · 43.7% (2,881 of 6,588 decks)
  7. Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.19 · 33.5% (2,207 of 6,588 decks)
  8. Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.18 · 45.2% (2,975 of 6,588 decks)
  9. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.17 · 35.5% (2,339 of 6,588 decks)
  10. Scute Swarm relevance 1.16 · 50.0% (3,293 of 6,588 decks)
  11. Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 33.8% (2,230 of 6,588 decks)
  12. Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.10 · 25.9% (1,704 of 6,588 decks)
  13. Sand Scout relevance 1.08 · 29.0% (1,910 of 6,588 decks)
  14. Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.04 · 46.3% (3,048 of 6,588 decks)
  15. Six relevance 1.00 · 23.8% (1,569 of 6,588 decks)
  16. Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.95 · 23.0% (1,518 of 6,588 decks)
  17. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.95 · 33.8% (2,225 of 6,588 decks)
  18. Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 0.91 · 30.6% (2,016 of 6,588 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Zuran Orb
    1.39 53.2%
    $3.69 €1.81
  • Conduit of Worlds
    1.08 29.1%
    $1.12 €1.38
  • Crucible of Worlds
    1.05 27.0%
    $33.00 €19.98
  • Exploration Broodship
    0.95 25.6%
    $3.05 €3.24
All artifacts (4)
  1. Zuran Orb relevance 1.39 · 53.2% (3,506 of 6,588 decks)
  2. Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.08 · 29.1% (1,919 of 6,588 decks)
  3. Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.05 · 27.0% (1,781 of 6,588 decks)
  4. Exploration Broodship relevance 0.95 · 25.6% (1,689 of 6,588 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Desert Warfare
    1.25 33.6%
    $0.42 €0.56
  • Spelunking
    1.14 34.4%
    $3.43 €3.18
  • Exploration
    1.10 34.8%
    $29.98 €27.12
All enchantments (3)
  1. Desert Warfare relevance 1.25 · 33.6% (2,214 of 6,588 decks)
  2. Spelunking relevance 1.14 · 34.4% (2,265 of 6,588 decks)
  3. Exploration relevance 1.10 · 34.8% (2,292 of 6,588 decks)

Instants

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    1.17 47.4%
    $3.83 €3.52
  • Harrow
    1.03 39.1%
    $0.32 €0.37
All instants (2)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 1.17 · 47.4% (3,120 of 6,588 decks)
  2. Harrow relevance 1.03 · 39.1% (2,575 of 6,588 decks)

Sorceries

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Scapeshift
    1.15 30.0%
    $41.65 €33.09
  • Map the Frontier
    1.06 30.2%
    $0.33 €0.18
  • Nahiri's Lithoforming
    0.98 25.1%
    $0.43 €0.45
  • Splendid Reclamation
    0.98 24.6%
    $0.33 €0.75
All sorceries (4)
  1. Scapeshift relevance 1.15 · 30.0% (1,978 of 6,588 decks)
  2. Map the Frontier relevance 1.06 · 30.2% (1,988 of 6,588 decks)
  3. Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 0.98 · 25.1% (1,656 of 6,588 decks)
  4. Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.98 · 24.6% (1,621 of 6,588 decks)

Utility Lands

12

Showing 1-10 of 12

Page size
  • Desert of the Indomitable
    1.35 40.1%
    $0.20 €0.15
  • Ramunap Ruins
    1.35 39.4%
    $0.34 €0.42
  • Shefet Dunes
    1.33 39.0%
    $0.30 €0.32
  • Desert of the Fervent
    1.33 39.3%
    $0.25 €0.14
  • Hashep Oasis
    1.33 39.2%
    $0.24 €0.21
  • Desert of the True
    1.33 39.3%
    $0.28 €0.18
  • Cactus Preserve
    1.32 38.1%
    $4.47 €5.04
  • Dunes of the Dead
    1.31 37.5%
    $0.29 €0.21
  • Conduit Pylons
    1.28 36.6%
    $0.28 €0.24
  • Arid Archway
    1.20 32.8%
    $1.55 €0.55
All utility lands (12)
  1. Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.35 · 40.1% (2,640 of 6,588 decks)
  2. Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.35 · 39.4% (2,598 of 6,588 decks)
  3. Shefet Dunes relevance 1.33 · 39.0% (2,567 of 6,588 decks)
  4. Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.33 · 39.3% (2,587 of 6,588 decks)
  5. Hashep Oasis relevance 1.33 · 39.2% (2,584 of 6,588 decks)
  6. Desert of the True relevance 1.33 · 39.3% (2,589 of 6,588 decks)
  7. Cactus Preserve relevance 1.32 · 38.1% (2,511 of 6,588 decks)
  8. Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.31 · 37.5% (2,468 of 6,588 decks)
  9. Conduit Pylons relevance 1.28 · 36.6% (2,412 of 6,588 decks)
  10. Arid Archway relevance 1.20 · 32.8% (2,160 of 6,588 decks)
  11. Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.00 · 27.7% (1,826 of 6,588 decks)
  12. Field of the Dead relevance 0.98 · 29.8% (1,962 of 6,588 decks)

Lands

7

Showing 1-7 of 7

Page size
  • Creosote Heath
    1.27 40.1%
    $0.27 €0.15
  • Bristling Backwoods
    1.27 40.2%
    $0.31 €0.18
  • Abraded Bluffs
    1.25 39.3%
    $0.37 €0.26
  • Mirage Mesa
    1.16 33.0%
    $0.19 €0.10
  • Painted Bluffs
    1.08 29.4%
    $0.20 €0.20
  • Survivors' Encampment
    1.05 27.5%
    $0.36 €0.44
  • Lotus Field
    0.92 27.2%
    $2.61 €2.59
All lands (7)
  1. Creosote Heath relevance 1.27 · 40.1% (2,641 of 6,588 decks)
  2. Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.27 · 40.2% (2,648 of 6,588 decks)
  3. Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.25 · 39.3% (2,590 of 6,588 decks)
  4. Mirage Mesa relevance 1.16 · 33.0% (2,172 of 6,588 decks)
  5. Painted Bluffs relevance 1.08 · 29.4% (1,940 of 6,588 decks)
  6. Survivors' Encampment relevance 1.05 · 27.5% (1,811 of 6,588 decks)
  7. Lotus Field relevance 0.92 · 27.2% (1,791 of 6,588 decks)

EDH data for Icetill Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,588 real decks.