Color Identity Spread
Commanders
29
Commanders
29All commanders (29)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.65 · 42.6% (367 of 862 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 2.54 · 22.9% (1,582 of 6,920 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.47 · 20.5% (1,847 of 9,008 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.43 · 23.3% (1,071 of 4,603 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 2.36 · 32.2% (364 of 1,132 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 1.90 · 19.6% (369 of 1,880 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 1.81 · 52.6% (41 of 78 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 1.78 · 24.5% (147 of 600 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 1.72 · 14.4% (525 of 3,646 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 1.57 · 16.8% (196 of 1,167 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 1.51 · 19.5% (110 of 564 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 1.31 · 8.6% (590 of 6,862 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 1.29 · 13.7% (124 of 904 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 1.13 · 10.0% (153 of 1,525 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 1.12 · 12.5% (81 of 650 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.05 · 9.7% (113 of 1,161 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Master Chef relevance 0.91 · 28.6% (10 of 35 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.88 · 11.5% (36 of 312 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 0.84 · 9.0% (51 of 564 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.83 · 10.2% (38 of 371 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.70 · 6.6% (57 of 867 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.63 · 23.8% (5 of 21 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.57 · 5.0% (52 of 1,030 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.57 · 16.2% (6 of 37 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.55 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.54 · 10.8% (9 of 83 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 0.53 · 4.5% (52 of 1,156 decks)
- Ignis Scientia relevance 0.50 · 8.4% (11 of 131 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.47 · 2.7% (167 of 6,148 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.32 · 58.3% (5,523 of 9,474 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.18 · 42.4% (4,016 of 9,474 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 51.5% (4,882 of 9,474 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.12 · 49.8% (4,717 of 9,474 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.03 · 39.2% (3,710 of 9,474 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.02 · 53.5% (5,071 of 9,474 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 39.5% (3,740 of 9,474 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.01 · 38.1% (3,608 of 9,474 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.97 · 45.2% (4,285 of 9,474 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.97 · 35.5% (3,359 of 9,474 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.89 · 25.8% (2,441 of 9,474 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.88 · 39.6% (3,747 of 9,474 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.88 · 46.2% (4,378 of 9,474 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.88 · 29.0% (2,752 of 9,474 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (2,143 of 9,474 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.84 · 25.7% (2,432 of 9,474 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.82 · 35.2% (3,334 of 9,474 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.82 · 59.4% (5,628 of 9,474 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.79 · 28.8% (2,732 of 9,474 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.78 · 27.9% (2,643 of 9,474 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.76 · 36.2% (3,426 of 9,474 decks)
- Six relevance 0.72 · 18.1% (1,713 of 9,474 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.70 · 22.8% (2,156 of 9,474 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.70 · 18.5% (1,750 of 9,474 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.69 · 26.3% (2,495 of 9,474 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.69 · 33.8% (3,202 of 9,474 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.68 · 21.9% (2,073 of 9,474 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.67 · 16.4% (1,552 of 9,474 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.65 · 17.0% (1,615 of 9,474 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.65 · 17.2% (1,632 of 9,474 decks)
Creatures
24
Creatures
24 All creatures (24)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.32 · 58.3% (5,523 of 9,474 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.18 · 42.4% (4,016 of 9,474 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.18 · 51.5% (4,882 of 9,474 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.03 · 39.2% (3,710 of 9,474 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.02 · 53.5% (5,071 of 9,474 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.02 · 39.5% (3,740 of 9,474 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.01 · 38.1% (3,608 of 9,474 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.97 · 45.2% (4,285 of 9,474 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.97 · 35.5% (3,359 of 9,474 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.88 · 46.2% (4,378 of 9,474 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.88 · 29.0% (2,752 of 9,474 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.86 · 22.6% (2,143 of 9,474 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.82 · 59.4% (5,628 of 9,474 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.78 · 27.9% (2,643 of 9,474 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.76 · 36.2% (3,426 of 9,474 decks)
- Six relevance 0.72 · 18.1% (1,713 of 9,474 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.70 · 22.8% (2,156 of 9,474 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.70 · 18.5% (1,750 of 9,474 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.69 · 33.8% (3,202 of 9,474 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.67 · 16.4% (1,552 of 9,474 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.65 · 17.2% (1,632 of 9,474 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.65 · 15.6% (1,482 of 9,474 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.63 · 18.9% (1,794 of 9,474 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.63 · 32.2% (3,055 of 9,474 decks)
Artifacts
3
Artifacts
3 All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.89 · 25.8% (2,441 of 9,474 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.84 · 25.7% (2,432 of 9,474 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.64 · 16.3% (1,540 of 9,474 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 1.12 · 49.8% (4,717 of 9,474 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.79 · 28.8% (2,732 of 9,474 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.68 · 21.9% (2,073 of 9,474 decks)
Instants
3
Instants
3 All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.88 · 39.6% (3,747 of 9,474 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.82 · 35.2% (3,334 of 9,474 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.69 · 26.3% (2,495 of 9,474 decks)
Sorceries
2
Sorceries
2 All sorceries (2)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.65 · 17.0% (1,615 of 9,474 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.63 · 15.5% (1,467 of 9,474 decks)
Utility Lands
5
Utility Lands
5 All utility lands (5)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.74 · 22.6% (2,138 of 9,474 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.69 · 38.9% (3,687 of 9,474 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.66 · 37.9% (3,591 of 9,474 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.63 · 21.3% (2,020 of 9,474 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.62 · 16.7% (1,578 of 9,474 decks)
Lands
10
Lands
10 All lands (10)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.78 · 48.4% (4,584 of 9,474 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.70 · 55.7% (5,278 of 9,474 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.70 · 30.2% (2,864 of 9,474 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.69 · 24.8% (2,351 of 9,474 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.68 · 42.2% (3,995 of 9,474 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.67 · 27.6% (2,618 of 9,474 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.64 · 26.0% (2,466 of 9,474 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.64 · 38.3% (3,627 of 9,474 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.62 · 27.8% (2,633 of 9,474 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.61 · 26.2% (2,485 of 9,474 decks)
EDH data for Icetill Explorer: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 9,474 real decks.















































































