Cards like Neoform
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Sultai decks
49% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Neoform 55%
- Eldritch Evolution 52%
- Diabolic Intent 15%
Cards like Mystic Remora
3.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Sultai decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.30 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 42%
- Rhystic Study 35%
Cards like Demonic Consultation
7.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Demonic Consultation 29%
- Tainted Pact 25%
Cards like Sol Ring
4.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Sultai decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.84 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 73%
- Mana Vault 22%
- Grim Monolith 6%
- Basalt Monolith 3%
Cards like Force of Will
5.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Force of Will 29%
- Force of Negation 28%
Cards like Training Grounds
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
4.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Chrome Mox
4.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 22%
- Mox Diamond 18%
Cards like Sacrifice
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Sacrifice 20%
- Culling the Weak 13%
- Metamorphosis 1%
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
2.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Sultai decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 42% of other Sultai decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Counterspell 39%
- Negate 17%
- Wash Away 6%
- Spell Snare 5%
- Stern Scolding 4%
Other options: Essence Scatter, Wild Unraveling, Remove Soul, Minor Misstep, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Talisman of Dominance
1.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 13% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Birthing Pod
8.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Thought Scour
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Flusterstorm
7.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Swan Song
5.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Swan Song 41%
- Strix Serenade 6%
Cards like Eternal Witness
1.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Sultai decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Eternal Witness 48%
- Timeless Witness 11%
Other options: Greenwarden of Murasa, Elvish Regrower, Golgari Findbroker, Sibsig Muckdraggers, Graveshifter, Cadaver Imp, Mausoleum Turnkey, Vampire Soulcaller, Wildwood Escort
Cards like Animate Dead
2.0× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Animate Dead 22%
- Necromancy 7%
- Dance of the Dead 3%
Cards like Brainstorm
15× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 22%
- Brainsurge 4%
Cards like Reanimate
5.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Reanimate 45%
- Life // Death 6%
Cards like Toxic Deluge
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Toxic Deluge 39%
- Languish 5%
Other options: Nausea, Drown in Sorrow, Rising Miasma, Shrivel, Mephitic Vapors, Infest, Withering Curse
Cards like Lotus Petal
4.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Mystical Tutor
5.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Merchant Scroll, Eerie Procession
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 28% of other Sultai decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.58 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 27%
- Elvish Mystic 20%
- Fyndhorn Elves 14%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Golden Hind, Gyre Engineer, Urborg Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Leaf Gilder, Nantuko Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Llanowar Dead, Wirewood Elf, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Woodland Mystic, Rootrider Faun, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Deathrite Shaman
5.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Fact or Fiction
13× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Epiphany at the Drownyard, Fortune's Favor, Truth or Tale
Cards like Windfall
4.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
4.4× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Dig Through Time
12× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
4.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Koma, Cosmos Serpent
3.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Sultai decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Neoform relevance 0.64 · 54.7% (1,641 of 2,998 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.78 · 35.9% (1,076 of 2,998 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 0.89 · 20.1% (602 of 2,998 decks)
- Scholar of the Lost Trove relevance 0.89 · 17.1% (513 of 2,998 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.77 · 28.0% (838 of 2,998 decks)
- Hazel's Brewmaster relevance 0.81 · 22.5% (674 of 2,998 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.60 · 52.1% (1,561 of 2,998 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.81 · 22.3% (669 of 2,998 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.70 · 31.5% (943 of 2,998 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.77 · 17.8% (535 of 2,998 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.74 · 19.8% (595 of 2,998 decks)
- Toxrill, the Corrosive relevance 0.68 · 25.0% (750 of 2,998 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.71 · 16.6% (498 of 2,998 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.65 · 24.9% (748 of 2,998 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.75 · 12.8% (383 of 2,998 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.58 · 33.3% (999 of 2,998 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.66 · 20.5% (614 of 2,998 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.65 · 20.1% (604 of 2,998 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.64 · 20.7% (622 of 2,998 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.71 · 12.9% (386 of 2,998 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.69 · 13.0% (391 of 2,998 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.63 · 18.6% (559 of 2,998 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.75 · 8.8% (265 of 2,998 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.80 · 6.0% (181 of 2,998 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.66 · 13.3% (400 of 2,998 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.77 · 6.7% (200 of 2,998 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (873 of 2,998 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.67 · 12.6% (379 of 2,998 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.64 · 14.5% (436 of 2,998 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.79 · 5.3% (158 of 2,998 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.82 · 4.8% (143 of 2,998 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.56 · 24.7% (742 of 2,998 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 0.80 · 4.8% (145 of 2,998 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.69 · 9.9% (297 of 2,998 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.70 · 9.4% (283 of 2,998 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.58 · 19.1% (574 of 2,998 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.56 · 22.6% (677 of 2,998 decks)
- Murderous Cut relevance 0.74 · 6.4% (191 of 2,998 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.69 · 9.3% (280 of 2,998 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.64 · 12.2% (365 of 2,998 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.71 · 7.7% (231 of 2,998 decks)
- Languish relevance 0.77 · 4.8% (143 of 2,998 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 19.6% (589 of 2,998 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.59 · 14.8% (444 of 2,998 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.50 · 30.3% (908 of 2,998 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.58 · 15.5% (466 of 2,998 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.52 · 25.4% (761 of 2,998 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.50 · 29.8% (893 of 2,998 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 0.70 · 6.7% (200 of 2,998 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (638 of 2,998 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.78 · 35.9% (1,076 of 2,998 decks)
- Scholar of the Lost Trove relevance 0.89 · 17.1% (513 of 2,998 decks)
- Hazel's Brewmaster relevance 0.81 · 22.5% (674 of 2,998 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.81 · 22.3% (669 of 2,998 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.74 · 19.8% (595 of 2,998 decks)
- Toxrill, the Corrosive relevance 0.68 · 25.0% (750 of 2,998 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.58 · 33.3% (999 of 2,998 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.66 · 20.5% (614 of 2,998 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.64 · 20.7% (622 of 2,998 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.63 · 18.6% (559 of 2,998 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.66 · 13.3% (400 of 2,998 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.69 · 9.9% (297 of 2,998 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.70 · 9.4% (283 of 2,998 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.71 · 7.7% (231 of 2,998 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.50 · 29.8% (893 of 2,998 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.54 · 21.3% (638 of 2,998 decks)
- The Cabbage Merchant relevance 0.63 · 9.9% (296 of 2,998 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.54 · 18.0% (539 of 2,998 decks)
- Endurance relevance 0.57 · 13.5% (406 of 2,998 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.56 · 14.0% (421 of 2,998 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.48 · 26.8% (804 of 2,998 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.53 · 16.0% (480 of 2,998 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.53 · 14.8% (443 of 2,998 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.54 · 13.7% (411 of 2,998 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.59 · 8.3% (249 of 2,998 decks)
- Kinnan, Bonder Prodigy relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (321 of 2,998 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.41 · 33.7% (1,009 of 2,998 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.34 · 47.1% (1,412 of 2,998 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.60 · 5.2% (155 of 2,998 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (337 of 2,998 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.38 · 29.5% (884 of 2,998 decks)
- Cosmogoyf relevance 0.67 · 3.8% (114 of 2,998 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.43 · 17.6% (528 of 2,998 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.54 · 6.3% (188 of 2,998 decks)
- Psychic Frog relevance 0.49 · 10.1% (303 of 2,998 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.49 · 10.5% (315 of 2,998 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.53 · 6.7% (200 of 2,998 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.40 · 17.0% (510 of 2,998 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 0.42 · 13.8% (415 of 2,998 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.29 · 47.5% (1,425 of 2,998 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.51 · 5.3% (158 of 2,998 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (229 of 2,998 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 0.65 · 3.5% (104 of 2,998 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (235 of 2,998 decks)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 0.46 · 7.8% (235 of 2,998 decks)
- Dauthi Voidwalker relevance 0.40 · 13.9% (418 of 2,998 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.48 · 5.1% (152 of 2,998 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.68 · 2.8% (85 of 2,998 decks)
- Golgari Grave-Troll relevance 0.47 · 6.0% (179 of 2,998 decks)
- Stinkweed Imp relevance 0.50 · 4.6% (138 of 2,998 decks)
All artifacts (33)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.70 · 31.5% (943 of 2,998 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.77 · 17.8% (535 of 2,998 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.75 · 12.8% (383 of 2,998 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.53 · 22.3% (668 of 2,998 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.55 · 15.5% (465 of 2,998 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.50 · 21.8% (654 of 2,998 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.52 · 18.3% (549 of 2,998 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.46 · 27.3% (818 of 2,998 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.62 · 6.3% (189 of 2,998 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.59 · 8.3% (249 of 2,998 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.45 · 12.5% (375 of 2,998 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.44 · 13.4% (402 of 2,998 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.37 · 26.4% (792 of 2,998 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.44 · 12.0% (361 of 2,998 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.49 · 5.7% (171 of 2,998 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.48 · 5.2% (157 of 2,998 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.42 · 9.1% (273 of 2,998 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.34 · 21.0% (630 of 2,998 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.33 · 18.9% (567 of 2,998 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.33 · 16.3% (490 of 2,998 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (87 of 2,998 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (149 of 2,998 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.51 · 2.9% (88 of 2,998 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.43 · 3.9% (117 of 2,998 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.28 · 7.6% (228 of 2,998 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.43 · 2.6% (79 of 2,998 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.27 · 6.2% (187 of 2,998 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (136 of 2,998 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.35 · 2.6% (78 of 2,998 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (83 of 2,998 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (128 of 2,998 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 55.7% (1,670 of 2,998 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 72.7% (2,181 of 2,998 decks)
All enchantments (34)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.77 · 28.0% (838 of 2,998 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.59 · 13.1% (394 of 2,998 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.55 · 14.9% (446 of 2,998 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.52 · 17.6% (529 of 2,998 decks)
- Fire Nation Occupation relevance 0.86 · 3.4% (103 of 2,998 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.64 · 5.5% (164 of 2,998 decks)
- Survival of the Fittest relevance 0.57 · 7.7% (232 of 2,998 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.37 · 41.7% (1,249 of 2,998 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.73 · 3.3% (100 of 2,998 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.42 · 17.4% (523 of 2,998 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.32 · 35.4% (1,060 of 2,998 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.36 · 22.2% (666 of 2,998 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (209 of 2,998 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (299 of 2,998 decks)
- Pernicious Deed relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (174 of 2,998 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (190 of 2,998 decks)
- Sultai Ascendancy relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (138 of 2,998 decks)
- Titans' Nest relevance 0.46 · 4.6% (139 of 2,998 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (159 of 2,998 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.32 · 20.9% (627 of 2,998 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.41 · 4.4% (133 of 2,998 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.54 · 2.6% (77 of 2,998 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.53 · 2.5% (76 of 2,998 decks)
- Dance of the Dead relevance 0.50 · 2.8% (83 of 2,998 decks)
- Awaken the Honored Dead relevance 0.36 · 4.7% (141 of 2,998 decks)
- Deadbridge Chant relevance 0.46 · 2.8% (85 of 2,998 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (113 of 2,998 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (169 of 2,998 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.44 · 2.8% (83 of 2,998 decks)
- Teval's Judgment relevance 0.28 · 6.5% (196 of 2,998 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (109 of 2,998 decks)
- Insidious Roots relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (107 of 2,998 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (76 of 2,998 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (82 of 2,998 decks)
All instants (50)
- Sacrifice relevance 0.89 · 20.1% (602 of 2,998 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.71 · 16.6% (498 of 2,998 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.65 · 24.9% (748 of 2,998 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.65 · 20.1% (604 of 2,998 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.71 · 12.9% (386 of 2,998 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.80 · 6.0% (181 of 2,998 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (873 of 2,998 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.64 · 14.5% (436 of 2,998 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.79 · 5.3% (158 of 2,998 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.82 · 4.8% (143 of 2,998 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.56 · 24.7% (742 of 2,998 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 0.80 · 4.8% (145 of 2,998 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.58 · 19.1% (574 of 2,998 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.56 · 22.6% (677 of 2,998 decks)
- Murderous Cut relevance 0.74 · 6.4% (191 of 2,998 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.64 · 12.2% (365 of 2,998 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 19.6% (589 of 2,998 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.50 · 30.3% (908 of 2,998 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.58 · 15.5% (466 of 2,998 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.52 · 25.4% (761 of 2,998 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 0.70 · 6.7% (200 of 2,998 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.64 · 10.7% (320 of 2,998 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.50 · 27.7% (830 of 2,998 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.51 · 24.0% (719 of 2,998 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 0.76 · 4.5% (136 of 2,998 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.58 · 13.2% (396 of 2,998 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.82 · 4.0% (120 of 2,998 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.43 · 38.6% (1,157 of 2,998 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.53 · 17.3% (519 of 2,998 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.68 · 5.8% (175 of 2,998 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.47 · 28.9% (866 of 2,998 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.54 · 15.6% (467 of 2,998 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.77 · 4.3% (129 of 2,998 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.48 · 26.2% (786 of 2,998 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.84 · 3.7% (111 of 2,998 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.47 · 28.6% (858 of 2,998 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.67 · 5.2% (156 of 2,998 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.64 · 6.8% (203 of 2,998 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.66 · 5.5% (164 of 2,998 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.70 · 4.7% (141 of 2,998 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.52 · 15.4% (462 of 2,998 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.61 · 8.7% (260 of 2,998 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.48 · 22.2% (666 of 2,998 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.62 · 7.3% (218 of 2,998 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.65 · 5.5% (166 of 2,998 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 0.58 · 10.2% (305 of 2,998 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.52 · 14.6% (438 of 2,998 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.65 · 5.1% (152 of 2,998 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 0.75 · 4.0% (119 of 2,998 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.59 · 7.6% (229 of 2,998 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Neoform relevance 0.64 · 54.7% (1,641 of 2,998 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.60 · 52.1% (1,561 of 2,998 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.69 · 13.0% (391 of 2,998 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.75 · 8.8% (265 of 2,998 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.77 · 6.7% (200 of 2,998 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.67 · 12.6% (379 of 2,998 decks)
- Languish relevance 0.77 · 4.8% (143 of 2,998 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.59 · 14.8% (444 of 2,998 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.62 · 11.6% (349 of 2,998 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.58 · 13.8% (415 of 2,998 decks)
- Thoughtseize relevance 0.75 · 4.5% (136 of 2,998 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.52 · 21.6% (649 of 2,998 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.64 · 9.0% (269 of 2,998 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.50 · 23.6% (708 of 2,998 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.64 · 7.4% (222 of 2,998 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.52 · 16.1% (484 of 2,998 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.40 · 41.6% (1,248 of 2,998 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.57 · 11.7% (350 of 2,998 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.63 · 6.0% (181 of 2,998 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.58 · 9.4% (281 of 2,998 decks)
- Life // Death relevance 0.60 · 6.1% (182 of 2,998 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 0.81 · 3.3% (99 of 2,998 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.47 · 14.8% (445 of 2,998 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.35 · 39.2% (1,174 of 2,998 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.47 · 11.4% (341 of 2,998 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.45 · 13.5% (405 of 2,998 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.33 · 39.2% (1,175 of 2,998 decks)
- Duress relevance 0.68 · 3.0% (91 of 2,998 decks)
- Vicious Rivalry relevance 0.58 · 3.9% (118 of 2,998 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.50 · 4.7% (140 of 2,998 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.65 · 3.0% (91 of 2,998 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.27 · 45.3% (1,359 of 2,998 decks)
- Chain of Smog relevance 0.61 · 3.0% (91 of 2,998 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.43 · 5.9% (177 of 2,998 decks)
- Analyze the Pollen relevance 0.60 · 3.1% (94 of 2,998 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.34 · 16.0% (481 of 2,998 decks)
- Dark Petition relevance 0.62 · 2.8% (84 of 2,998 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.45 · 4.8% (144 of 2,998 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.59 · 3.1% (92 of 2,998 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.41 · 7.1% (214 of 2,998 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.41 · 6.3% (189 of 2,998 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.30 · 24.0% (720 of 2,998 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.37 · 10.1% (304 of 2,998 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.51 · 3.6% (109 of 2,998 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.51 · 3.6% (107 of 2,998 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.42 · 4.7% (140 of 2,998 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.47 · 3.9% (116 of 2,998 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.51 · 3.3% (100 of 2,998 decks)
- Demonic Counsel relevance 0.54 · 2.9% (88 of 2,998 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.34 · 11.0% (329 of 2,998 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (8)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.69 · 9.3% (280 of 2,998 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.58 · 13.2% (397 of 2,998 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.55 · 10.7% (321 of 2,998 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.69 · 4.0% (121 of 2,998 decks)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.52 · 9.1% (272 of 2,998 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.70 · 3.6% (108 of 2,998 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.65 · 3.9% (116 of 2,998 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.52 · 2.8% (84 of 2,998 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.56 · 15.5% (466 of 2,998 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.55 · 11.3% (339 of 2,998 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.53 · 9.1% (274 of 2,998 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.75 · 3.2% (96 of 2,998 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.34 · 37.0% (1,110 of 2,998 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.57 · 4.7% (141 of 2,998 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.48 · 10.1% (303 of 2,998 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.47 · 10.6% (318 of 2,998 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.57 · 4.6% (138 of 2,998 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.41 · 15.3% (460 of 2,998 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.50 · 7.4% (223 of 2,998 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.42 · 14.4% (433 of 2,998 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.34 · 31.0% (929 of 2,998 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.54 · 4.4% (133 of 2,998 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.49 · 5.2% (156 of 2,998 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.29 · 41.0% (1,229 of 2,998 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.39 · 14.1% (424 of 2,998 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.46 · 7.1% (212 of 2,998 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.38 · 15.1% (452 of 2,998 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.36 · 17.5% (525 of 2,998 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.32 · 27.7% (831 of 2,998 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.44 · 7.3% (219 of 2,998 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.31 · 29.4% (882 of 2,998 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.33 · 19.9% (597 of 2,998 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.53 · 3.7% (110 of 2,998 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.39 · 9.0% (269 of 2,998 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.32 · 19.1% (574 of 2,998 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.39 · 8.1% (244 of 2,998 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (218 of 2,998 decks)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.53 · 3.4% (103 of 2,998 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.49 · 3.8% (113 of 2,998 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.48 · 3.5% (105 of 2,998 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.27 · 17.1% (512 of 2,998 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (125 of 2,998 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.41 · 3.8% (113 of 2,998 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.44 · 3.2% (97 of 2,998 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.30 · 8.3% (248 of 2,998 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.25 · 14.2% (427 of 2,998 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.31 · 5.3% (159 of 2,998 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.23 · 20.3% (610 of 2,998 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (118 of 2,998 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.30 · 5.9% (176 of 2,998 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.29 · 7.2% (215 of 2,998 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.20 · 30.0% (898 of 2,998 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.42 · 2.6% (77 of 2,998 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (150 of 2,998 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (204 of 2,998 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.23 · 9.9% (296 of 2,998 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.31 · 3.7% (111 of 2,998 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.20 · 7.6% (229 of 2,998 decks)
All lands (50)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.48 · 36.2% (1,084 of 2,998 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.47 · 35.8% (1,073 of 2,998 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.46 · 37.1% (1,111 of 2,998 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.45 · 39.2% (1,176 of 2,998 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.71 · 5.7% (172 of 2,998 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.44 · 38.6% (1,158 of 2,998 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.45 · 35.7% (1,069 of 2,998 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.51 · 18.7% (561 of 2,998 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.44 · 27.8% (832 of 2,998 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.43 · 29.8% (894 of 2,998 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.45 · 22.3% (670 of 2,998 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.55 · 8.1% (244 of 2,998 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.38 · 31.5% (945 of 2,998 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (396 of 2,998 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (395 of 2,998 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.38 · 31.8% (953 of 2,998 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.37 · 32.0% (960 of 2,998 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.59 · 4.7% (141 of 2,998 decks)
- River of Tears relevance 0.61 · 4.3% (130 of 2,998 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.45 · 10.5% (316 of 2,998 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.43 · 9.6% (289 of 2,998 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (310 of 2,998 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.45 · 6.7% (202 of 2,998 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.43 · 8.4% (253 of 2,998 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.46 · 5.7% (170 of 2,998 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.46 · 5.2% (155 of 2,998 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.45 · 5.6% (169 of 2,998 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.44 · 5.0% (151 of 2,998 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 57.6% (1,726 of 2,998 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.22 · 57.7% (1,731 of 2,998 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.21 · 59.1% (1,773 of 2,998 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.43 · 4.9% (146 of 2,998 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.60 · 2.7% (82 of 2,998 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (173 of 2,998 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.30 · 22.7% (680 of 2,998 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.38 · 7.3% (219 of 2,998 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.37 · 7.4% (223 of 2,998 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.27 · 27.3% (818 of 2,998 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.39 · 5.5% (164 of 2,998 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (149 of 2,998 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.39 · 4.5% (135 of 2,998 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.28 · 17.0% (509 of 2,998 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.31 · 11.2% (335 of 2,998 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (248 of 2,998 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.31 · 10.7% (322 of 2,998 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.35 · 5.3% (160 of 2,998 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.24 · 29.6% (888 of 2,998 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.35 · 4.9% (148 of 2,998 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.23 · 32.1% (961 of 2,998 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.30 · 9.9% (296 of 2,998 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Tasigur, the Golden Fang, from 2,998 real Commander decks.