Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
9.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Sultai decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Tatyova, Benthic Druid
5.4× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Sultai decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Gandalf, Shadow's Foe
Cards like Icetill Explorer
3.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Sultai decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Exploration
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Sultai decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Animate Dead
3.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Animate Dead 36%
- Necromancy 11%
- Dance of the Dead 4%
Cards like Loot, Exuberant Explorer
19× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Conduit of Worlds
3.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
1.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Sultai decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Lumra, Bellow of the Woods
11× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Dread Return
7.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Dread Return 30%
- Zombify 7%
- Diregraf Rebirth 2%
- Entreat the Dead 1%
Other options: Edgar's Awakening, Rise Again, Graveyard Shift
Cards like Colossal Grave-Reaver
1.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other Sultai decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Scute Swarm
2.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Poison Dart Frog
4.4× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Poison Dart Frog 16%
- Frog Butler 6%
Other options: Noxious Newt, Deathbloom Gardener, Leyline Prowler, Accomplished Alchemist, Nightshade Dryad
Cards like Brainstorm
9.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 19%
- Brainsurge 2%
Cards like Aftermath Analyst
1.6× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Aftermath Analyst 23%
- World Shaper 10%
Cards like Noxious Revival
19× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
9.8× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Sultai decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Sultai decks
All top picks (50)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.53 · 37.4% (83 of 222 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.54 · 24.8% (55 of 222 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.54 · 17.1% (38 of 222 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.51 · 21.6% (48 of 222 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.51 · 22.1% (49 of 222 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 0.52 · 18.0% (40 of 222 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.53 · 14.4% (32 of 222 decks)
- Long River Lurker relevance 0.54 · 13.1% (29 of 222 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (36 of 222 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.52 · 13.1% (29 of 222 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.46 · 23.0% (51 of 222 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.35 · 47.3% (105 of 222 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.53 · 10.8% (24 of 222 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Lilysplash Mentor relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Clement, the Worrywort relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.52 · 10.8% (24 of 222 decks)
- Dreamdew Entrancer relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.48 · 14.0% (31 of 222 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.37 · 36.9% (82 of 222 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.47 · 15.3% (34 of 222 decks)
- Polliwallop relevance 0.52 · 9.9% (22 of 222 decks)
- Mirko, Obsessive Theorist relevance 0.51 · 10.8% (24 of 222 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.41 · 26.1% (58 of 222 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (31 of 222 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 0.52 · 9.5% (21 of 222 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.51 · 9.9% (22 of 222 decks)
- Splash Lasher relevance 0.52 · 8.6% (19 of 222 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Pond Prophet relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 0.41 · 23.0% (51 of 222 decks)
- Coiling Rebirth relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Clifftop Lookout relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (28 of 222 decks)
- Valley Mightcaller relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Savvy Trader relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (22 of 222 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.42 · 18.9% (42 of 222 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.33 · 41.4% (92 of 222 decks)
- Baleful Mastery relevance 0.47 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (19 of 222 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.34 · 36.9% (82 of 222 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.46 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Mistbreath Elder relevance 0.51 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.45 · 12.6% (28 of 222 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.42 · 15.3% (34 of 222 decks)
- Bellowing Crier relevance 0.50 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.49 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Octomancer relevance 0.49 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.44 · 11.7% (26 of 222 decks)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.49 · 6.8% (15 of 222 decks)
- Rampant Frogantua relevance 0.44 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.54 · 17.1% (38 of 222 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.51 · 21.6% (48 of 222 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 0.52 · 18.0% (40 of 222 decks)
- Long River Lurker relevance 0.54 · 13.1% (29 of 222 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (36 of 222 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.52 · 13.1% (29 of 222 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.46 · 23.0% (51 of 222 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.35 · 47.3% (105 of 222 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.53 · 10.8% (24 of 222 decks)
- Lilysplash Mentor relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Clement, the Worrywort relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.52 · 10.8% (24 of 222 decks)
- Dreamdew Entrancer relevance 0.53 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.37 · 36.9% (82 of 222 decks)
- Mirko, Obsessive Theorist relevance 0.51 · 10.8% (24 of 222 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.41 · 26.1% (58 of 222 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 0.52 · 9.5% (21 of 222 decks)
- Froghemoth relevance 0.51 · 9.9% (22 of 222 decks)
- Splash Lasher relevance 0.52 · 8.6% (19 of 222 decks)
- Pond Prophet relevance 0.52 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 0.41 · 23.0% (51 of 222 decks)
- Clifftop Lookout relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (28 of 222 decks)
- Valley Mightcaller relevance 0.51 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Savvy Trader relevance 0.49 · 9.9% (22 of 222 decks)
- Mistbreath Elder relevance 0.51 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.45 · 12.6% (28 of 222 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.42 · 15.3% (34 of 222 decks)
- Bellowing Crier relevance 0.50 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Octomancer relevance 0.49 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Rampant Frogantua relevance 0.44 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.31 · 42.8% (95 of 222 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.40 · 17.6% (39 of 222 decks)
- Metamorphosis Fanatic relevance 0.42 · 12.2% (27 of 222 decks)
- Three Tree Scribe relevance 0.49 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.31 · 37.8% (84 of 222 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.37 · 18.0% (40 of 222 decks)
- Uurg, Spawn of Turg relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (19 of 222 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.41 · 10.8% (24 of 222 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.46 · 5.9% (13 of 222 decks)
- Psychic Frog relevance 0.34 · 21.6% (48 of 222 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.32 · 27.9% (62 of 222 decks)
- Sunshower Druid relevance 0.47 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Stickytongue Sentinel relevance 0.47 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- The Gitrog, Ravenous Ride relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.36 · 14.9% (33 of 222 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.45 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.40 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.32 · 19.4% (43 of 222 decks)
- Koma, Cosmos Serpent relevance 0.38 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
All artifacts (42)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.54 · 24.8% (55 of 222 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.51 · 22.1% (49 of 222 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.44 · 11.7% (26 of 222 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.31 · 10.8% (24 of 222 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.29 · 12.6% (28 of 222 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.31 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Broodheart Engine relevance 0.33 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.19 · 41.0% (91 of 222 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.28 · 9.5% (21 of 222 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.23 · 14.0% (31 of 222 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.17 · 37.4% (83 of 222 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Fountainport Bell relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.30 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.26 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.24 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.19 · 16.7% (37 of 222 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- The Soul Stone relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Whip of Erebos relevance 0.28 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.25 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (5 of 222 decks)
- Heaped Harvest relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (5 of 222 decks)
- Patchwork Banner relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (5 of 222 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Cauldron of Essence relevance 0.18 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (5 of 222 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 47.3% (105 of 222 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.06 · 68.0% (151 of 222 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.13 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.53 · 37.4% (83 of 222 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.53 · 14.4% (32 of 222 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.52 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.47 · 14.0% (31 of 222 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.34 · 36.9% (82 of 222 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.46 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.49 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Disinformation Campaign relevance 0.47 · 5.9% (13 of 222 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.44 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.41 · 9.9% (22 of 222 decks)
- Fisher's Talent relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.42 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.34 · 13.5% (30 of 222 decks)
- Virtue of Persistence // Locthwain Scorn relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (19 of 222 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.33 · 14.4% (32 of 222 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.37 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.34 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.36 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 0.31 · 10.8% (24 of 222 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.22 · 36.0% (80 of 222 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.33 · 5.9% (13 of 222 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.26 · 14.4% (32 of 222 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.41 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.35 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.28 · 9.9% (22 of 222 decks)
- Binding the Old Gods relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.23 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Funeral Room // Awakening Hall relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Dance of the Dead relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.33 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.30 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Sultai Ascendancy relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.27 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Case of the Shifting Visage relevance 0.31 · 2.3% (5 of 222 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.28 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Oversold Cemetery relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.23 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (5 of 222 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.13 · 25.2% (56 of 222 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Polluted Cistern // Dim Oubliette relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Deadbridge Chant relevance 0.21 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
All instants (50)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.48 · 14.0% (31 of 222 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.47 · 15.3% (34 of 222 decks)
- Polliwallop relevance 0.52 · 9.9% (22 of 222 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.42 · 18.9% (42 of 222 decks)
- Baleful Mastery relevance 0.47 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (19 of 222 decks)
- Turn to Frog relevance 0.49 · 6.8% (15 of 222 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.49 · 5.9% (13 of 222 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.44 · 9.9% (22 of 222 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.33 · 29.7% (66 of 222 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.35 · 21.6% (48 of 222 decks)
- Drag to the Roots relevance 0.36 · 17.6% (39 of 222 decks)
- Price of Fame relevance 0.43 · 6.8% (15 of 222 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Mana Sculpt relevance 0.45 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.36 · 12.2% (27 of 222 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.42 · 5.9% (13 of 222 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.39 · 8.6% (19 of 222 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.31 · 20.3% (45 of 222 decks)
- Pile On relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.36 · 9.5% (21 of 222 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.44 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.36 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.31 · 12.2% (27 of 222 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.35 · 6.8% (15 of 222 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.30 · 11.7% (26 of 222 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.40 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 0.31 · 8.6% (19 of 222 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.26 · 16.2% (36 of 222 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.24 · 21.6% (48 of 222 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.24 · 22.1% (49 of 222 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.25 · 18.0% (40 of 222 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.28 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.23 · 23.4% (52 of 222 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Flotsam // Jetsam relevance 0.31 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.27 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.19 · 39.2% (87 of 222 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.25 · 12.6% (28 of 222 decks)
- Flare of Malice relevance 0.36 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.23 · 17.1% (38 of 222 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.27 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Coiling Rebirth relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.33 · 41.4% (92 of 222 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.47 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (15 of 222 decks)
- Diresight relevance 0.40 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.41 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Doomsday relevance 0.43 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.37 · 9.5% (21 of 222 decks)
- Will of the Abzan relevance 0.37 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Portent of Calamity relevance 0.41 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.35 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 0.27 · 22.5% (50 of 222 decks)
- Zombify relevance 0.35 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Rise of the Witch-king relevance 0.30 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.32 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.31 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.29 · 10.8% (24 of 222 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.28 · 12.2% (27 of 222 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.17 · 54.1% (120 of 222 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.22 · 27.9% (62 of 222 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.27 · 11.7% (26 of 222 decks)
- Beseech the Queen relevance 0.39 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.23 · 19.8% (44 of 222 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.28 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.29 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.22 · 19.8% (44 of 222 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Incarnation Technique relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (21 of 222 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.19 · 30.2% (67 of 222 decks)
- Vicious Rivalry relevance 0.31 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Stargaze relevance 0.31 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Wear Down relevance 0.34 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.19 · 16.2% (36 of 222 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.22 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.36 · 2.3% (5 of 222 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.39 · 8.1% (18 of 222 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.32 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.29 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 0.26 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Ral Zarek, Guest Lecturer relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Liliana, Death's Majesty relevance 0.23 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Grist, the Hunger Tide relevance 0.22 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Grist, Voracious Larva // Grist, the Plague Swarm relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Tamiyo, Collector of Tales relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (5 of 222 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Lilypad Village relevance 0.51 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Oakhollow Village relevance 0.48 · 5.9% (13 of 222 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.40 · 9.5% (21 of 222 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.33 · 21.2% (47 of 222 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.32 · 23.0% (51 of 222 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.37 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.31 · 19.4% (43 of 222 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.36 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.29 · 15.3% (34 of 222 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.26 · 19.8% (44 of 222 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.24 · 18.9% (42 of 222 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.20 · 36.9% (82 of 222 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.26 · 12.2% (27 of 222 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.24 · 15.8% (35 of 222 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.19 · 40.5% (90 of 222 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.30 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.29 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.37 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.21 · 23.9% (53 of 222 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.19 · 31.1% (69 of 222 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.18 · 37.4% (83 of 222 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.18 · 37.8% (84 of 222 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.26 · 8.6% (19 of 222 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Agadeem's Awakening // Agadeem, the Undercrypt relevance 0.27 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.25 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.25 · 9.5% (21 of 222 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.35 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.20 · 21.2% (47 of 222 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.27 · 5.9% (13 of 222 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.15 · 45.0% (100 of 222 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (31 of 222 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Mortuary Mire relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (11 of 222 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (6 of 222 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (8 of 222 decks)
- Festering Gulch relevance 0.29 · 3.2% (7 of 222 decks)
All lands (50)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.27 · 27.9% (62 of 222 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.27 · 21.2% (47 of 222 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.26 · 23.9% (53 of 222 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.29 · 13.1% (29 of 222 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.28 · 14.4% (32 of 222 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.28 · 12.6% (28 of 222 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.31 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Wastewood Verge relevance 0.27 · 14.9% (33 of 222 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.28 · 11.7% (26 of 222 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.29 · 9.5% (21 of 222 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.24 · 23.9% (53 of 222 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.31 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.23 · 25.7% (57 of 222 decks)
- Necroblossom Snarl relevance 0.30 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.24 · 21.2% (47 of 222 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.29 · 9.0% (20 of 222 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.30 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Darkbore Pathway // Slitherbore Pathway relevance 0.30 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Vernal Fen relevance 0.26 · 13.1% (29 of 222 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.29 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.21 · 32.0% (71 of 222 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.21 · 29.3% (65 of 222 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (15 of 222 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (17 of 222 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.27 · 9.5% (21 of 222 decks)
- Viridescent Bog relevance 0.28 · 8.6% (19 of 222 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.19 · 36.0% (80 of 222 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.20 · 30.6% (68 of 222 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.26 · 11.3% (25 of 222 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.25 · 11.7% (26 of 222 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.27 · 9.9% (22 of 222 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.28 · 6.8% (15 of 222 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.28 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.22 · 21.2% (47 of 222 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.26 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.18 · 38.3% (85 of 222 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.25 · 10.4% (23 of 222 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.29 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Turbulent Fen relevance 0.27 · 5.9% (13 of 222 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.28 · 5.4% (12 of 222 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.18 · 34.2% (76 of 222 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.28 · 4.5% (10 of 222 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (14 of 222 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.16 · 40.5% (90 of 222 decks)
- Tainted Wood relevance 0.25 · 7.2% (16 of 222 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.15 · 41.4% (92 of 222 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.18 · 27.0% (60 of 222 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.28 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.27 · 4.1% (9 of 222 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Glarb, Calamity's Augur, from 222 real Commander decks.