Perennial Behemoth
Played in 2,508 Naya decks
730+18+1+3+3+10+13+2+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Yuma, Proud Protector 45.1% of decks
Yuma, Proud Protector 45.1% of decks
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 8.2% of decks
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 8.2% of decks
Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor 3.6% of decks
Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor 3.6% of decks
Kirri, Talented Sprout 3.6% of decks
Kirri, Talented Sprout 3.6% of decks
Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 4.1% of decks
Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 4.1% of decks
Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kodama of the East Tree 5.6% of decks
Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kodama of the East Tree 5.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Ramunap Excavator 79.7% of decks
Ramunap Excavator 79.7% of decks
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 67.3% of decks
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 67.3% of decks
World Shaper 65.1% of decks
World Shaper 65.1% of decks
Rumbleweed 66.3% of decks
Rumbleweed 66.3% of decks
Dune Chanter 83.5% of decks
Dune Chanter 83.5% of decks
Titania, Protector of Argoth 79.2% of decks
Titania, Protector of Argoth 79.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 5.37 · 45.1% (1,695 of 3,756 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.48 · 8.2% (366 of 4,441 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 1.20 · 3.6% (66 of 1,852 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.15 · 3.6% (53 of 1,469 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.49 · 4.1% (4 of 98 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.10 · 1.2% (1 of 83 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.84 · 79.7% (1,999 of 2,508 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.83 · 67.3% (1,689 of 2,508 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 2.71 · 65.1% (1,633 of 2,508 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 2.71 · 66.3% (1,664 of 2,508 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 2.69 · 83.5% (2,093 of 2,508 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.64 · 79.2% (1,987 of 2,508 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.62 · 56.7% (1,421 of 2,508 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 2.62 · 60.2% (1,510 of 2,508 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 2.62 · 74.4% (1,867 of 2,508 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 2.55 · 68.5% (1,719 of 2,508 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 2.52 · 66.9% (1,677 of 2,508 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.47 · 75.8% (1,901 of 2,508 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 2.46 · 55.6% (1,394 of 2,508 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 2.46 · 58.8% (1,475 of 2,508 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.45 · 74.5% (1,869 of 2,508 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 2.41 · 56.1% (1,407 of 2,508 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 2.40 · 66.2% (1,661 of 2,508 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 2.39 · 52.4% (1,313 of 2,508 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 2.35 · 58.1% (1,457 of 2,508 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 2.19 · 43.7% (1,097 of 2,508 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.15 · 72.0% (1,805 of 2,508 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 2.12 · 75.8% (1,901 of 2,508 decks)
- Thrilling Discovery relevance 2.11 · 45.3% (1,136 of 2,508 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 2.09 · 42.6% (1,068 of 2,508 decks)
- Bovine Intervention relevance 2.09 · 48.5% (1,216 of 2,508 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 2.06 · 43.0% (1,078 of 2,508 decks)
- Harrow relevance 2.03 · 77.1% (1,933 of 2,508 decks)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 2.03 · 41.3% (1,035 of 2,508 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 1.84 · 40.2% (1,009 of 2,508 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 1.82 · 52.2% (1,309 of 2,508 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 2.84 · 79.7% (1,999 of 2,508 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.83 · 67.3% (1,689 of 2,508 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 2.71 · 65.1% (1,633 of 2,508 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 2.71 · 66.3% (1,664 of 2,508 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 2.69 · 83.5% (2,093 of 2,508 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.64 · 79.2% (1,987 of 2,508 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.62 · 56.7% (1,421 of 2,508 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 2.55 · 68.5% (1,719 of 2,508 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.47 · 75.8% (1,901 of 2,508 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.45 · 74.5% (1,869 of 2,508 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 2.40 · 66.2% (1,661 of 2,508 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 2.39 · 52.4% (1,313 of 2,508 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 2.15 · 72.0% (1,805 of 2,508 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 2.12 · 75.8% (1,901 of 2,508 decks)
- Satyr Wayfinder relevance 2.06 · 43.0% (1,078 of 2,508 decks)
- Eccentric Farmer relevance 1.74 · 31.6% (792 of 2,508 decks)
- Sun Titan relevance 1.71 · 47.4% (1,188 of 2,508 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.68 · 72.3% (1,813 of 2,508 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Perpetual Timepiece relevance 2.03 · 41.3% (1,035 of 2,508 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 2.35 · 58.1% (1,457 of 2,508 decks)
- Crawling Sensation relevance 2.19 · 43.7% (1,097 of 2,508 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 1.84 · 40.2% (1,009 of 2,508 decks)
All instants (3)
- Bovine Intervention relevance 2.09 · 48.5% (1,216 of 2,508 decks)
- Harrow relevance 2.03 · 77.1% (1,933 of 2,508 decks)
- Electric Revelation relevance 1.69 · 32.1% (806 of 2,508 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 2.62 · 60.2% (1,510 of 2,508 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 2.62 · 74.4% (1,867 of 2,508 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 2.52 · 66.9% (1,677 of 2,508 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 2.46 · 55.6% (1,394 of 2,508 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 2.46 · 58.8% (1,475 of 2,508 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 2.41 · 56.1% (1,407 of 2,508 decks)
- Thrilling Discovery relevance 2.11 · 45.3% (1,136 of 2,508 decks)
- Winding Way relevance 2.09 · 42.6% (1,068 of 2,508 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 1.82 · 52.2% (1,309 of 2,508 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 1.65 · 47.6% (1,193 of 2,508 decks)
All utility lands (13)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 2.82 · 80.6% (2,021 of 2,508 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 2.77 · 81.5% (2,044 of 2,508 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 2.76 · 81.7% (2,050 of 2,508 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 2.76 · 81.4% (2,042 of 2,508 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 2.75 · 80.3% (2,013 of 2,508 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 2.74 · 80.8% (2,027 of 2,508 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 2.74 · 79.9% (2,003 of 2,508 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 2.72 · 78.0% (1,955 of 2,508 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 2.71 · 78.2% (1,962 of 2,508 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 2.56 · 80.8% (2,027 of 2,508 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 2.55 · 80.4% (2,017 of 2,508 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 2.54 · 79.7% (2,000 of 2,508 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 1.68 · 75.6% (1,897 of 2,508 decks)
All lands (2)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 2.69 · 73.1% (1,833 of 2,508 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 2.69 · 76.4% (1,917 of 2,508 decks)
EDH data for Perennial Behemoth: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,508 real decks.














































