Cryptic Caves
Played in 1,998 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
10.5% Green
- Colorless 2,591 · 13.7%
- Green 1,998 · 10.5%
- Gruul 1,809 · 9.5%
- Naya 1,062 · 5.6%
- Golgari 1,021 · 5.4%
- White 968 · 5.1%
- Azorius 943 · 5.0%
- Simic 860 · 4.5%
- Red 835 · 4.4%
- Jund 824 · 4.3%
- Black 819 · 4.3%
- Blue 696 · 3.7%
- Boros 662 · 3.5%
- Orzhov 540 · 2.8%
- Rakdos 496 · 2.6%
- Sultai 457 · 2.4%
- Abzan 398 · 2.1%
- Other (15) 1,979 · 10.4%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 3.07 · 18.3% (242 of 1,321 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.45 · 8.5% (314 of 3,676 decks)
- Haru, Hidden Talent relevance 2.06 · 26.5% (26 of 98 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 1.94 · 9.6% (77 of 800 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.66 · 3.9% (248 of 6,283 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.63 · 8.6% (44 of 510 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 1.29 · 3.1% (123 of 3,912 decks)
- Jolrael, Mwonvuli Recluse relevance 1.28 · 8.0% (21 of 263 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 1.15 · 13.0% (9 of 69 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Erinis, Gloom Stalker relevance 1.10 · 36.4% (4 of 11 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 1.04 · 6.6% (14 of 212 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 0.86 · 4.3% (14 of 322 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.80 · 4.2% (12 of 283 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 0.68 · 1.1% (115 of 10,162 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.64 · 4.1% (7 of 169 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.64 · 2.1% (20 of 972 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 0.61 · 1.9% (20 of 1,055 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.60 · 9.1% (3 of 33 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.60 · 2.0% (17 of 840 decks)
- Mythweaver Poq relevance 0.60 · 16.7% (2 of 12 decks)
- Greensleeves relevance 0.59 · 6.1% (4 of 66 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.59 · 2.9% (9 of 315 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.51 · 3.0% (6 of 197 decks)
- Six relevance 0.50 · 1.3% (24 of 1,902 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 0.48 · 1.3% (21 of 1,633 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.48 · 1.1% (28 of 2,467 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.48 · 3.1% (5 of 159 decks)
- Varis, Silverymoon Ranger relevance 0.47 · 2.3% (7 of 300 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.47 · 1.2% (21 of 1,689 decks)
- Captain Kathryn Janeway relevance 0.44 · 4.5% (3 of 67 decks)
All most relevant (28)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.96 · 34.8% (695 of 1,998 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.86 · 34.7% (693 of 1,998 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.78 · 34.4% (688 of 1,998 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.76 · 42.1% (842 of 1,998 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.75 · 31.4% (628 of 1,998 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.75 · 39.0% (780 of 1,998 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.74 · 37.2% (744 of 1,998 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.73 · 27.7% (553 of 1,998 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.72 · 27.1% (542 of 1,998 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.72 · 42.3% (845 of 1,998 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.71 · 37.1% (742 of 1,998 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.70 · 31.3% (625 of 1,998 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.69 · 36.4% (728 of 1,998 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.69 · 29.4% (588 of 1,998 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.69 · 34.3% (686 of 1,998 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.68 · 23.1% (462 of 1,998 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.68 · 25.6% (511 of 1,998 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.68 · 21.9% (438 of 1,998 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.67 · 32.8% (656 of 1,998 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.67 · 21.9% (437 of 1,998 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.66 · 23.5% (470 of 1,998 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.65 · 19.7% (393 of 1,998 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.63 · 22.5% (449 of 1,998 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 20.3% (405 of 1,998 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.60 · 19.0% (379 of 1,998 decks)
- Six relevance 0.58 · 21.1% (421 of 1,998 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.57 · 29.9% (598 of 1,998 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (249 of 1,998 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.86 · 34.7% (693 of 1,998 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.78 · 34.4% (688 of 1,998 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.75 · 31.4% (628 of 1,998 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.75 · 39.0% (780 of 1,998 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.74 · 37.2% (744 of 1,998 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.72 · 27.1% (542 of 1,998 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.71 · 37.1% (742 of 1,998 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.70 · 31.3% (625 of 1,998 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.69 · 36.4% (728 of 1,998 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.69 · 29.4% (588 of 1,998 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.69 · 34.3% (686 of 1,998 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.68 · 23.1% (462 of 1,998 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.67 · 32.8% (656 of 1,998 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.67 · 21.9% (437 of 1,998 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.66 · 23.5% (470 of 1,998 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.65 · 19.7% (393 of 1,998 decks)
- Six relevance 0.58 · 21.1% (421 of 1,998 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.57 · 29.9% (598 of 1,998 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (249 of 1,998 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.96 · 34.8% (695 of 1,998 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.73 · 27.7% (553 of 1,998 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 20.3% (405 of 1,998 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Spelunking relevance 0.63 · 22.5% (449 of 1,998 decks)
All instants (3)
- Harrow relevance 0.76 · 42.1% (842 of 1,998 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.72 · 42.3% (845 of 1,998 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.68 · 25.6% (511 of 1,998 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.68 · 21.9% (438 of 1,998 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.60 · 19.0% (379 of 1,998 decks)
All utility lands (12)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.85 · 28.6% (571 of 1,998 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.78 · 28.5% (569 of 1,998 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.77 · 25.3% (505 of 1,998 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.75 · 31.7% (633 of 1,998 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.72 · 17.8% (355 of 1,998 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.71 · 20.5% (409 of 1,998 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.67 · 28.3% (566 of 1,998 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.65 · 39.6% (791 of 1,998 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.63 · 19.4% (388 of 1,998 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.62 · 22.3% (446 of 1,998 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.61 · 14.6% (292 of 1,998 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.58 · 15.7% (313 of 1,998 decks)
All lands (10)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.88 · 46.8% (936 of 1,998 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.83 · 41.4% (827 of 1,998 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.82 · 42.2% (844 of 1,998 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.81 · 27.7% (554 of 1,998 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.65 · 19.4% (387 of 1,998 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.63 · 16.3% (326 of 1,998 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.61 · 21.3% (426 of 1,998 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.61 · 22.0% (440 of 1,998 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.57 · 20.4% (407 of 1,998 decks)
- Havenwood Battleground relevance 0.57 · 15.9% (318 of 1,998 decks)
EDH data for Cryptic Caves: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,998 real decks.