Will of the Sultai
Played in 934 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
2.6% Simic
All commanders (30)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 3.25 · 14.3% (126 of 883 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 2.38 · 6.8% (82 of 1,202 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 1.81 · 17.4% (12 of 69 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 1.63 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 1.53 · 4.3% (27 of 624 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.21 · 2.4% (28 of 1,159 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 1.16 · 2.5% (23 of 935 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 1.12 · 1.9% (31 of 1,615 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.12 · 1.1% (102 of 9,304 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 1.08 · 1.7% (33 of 1,942 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.05 · 1.2% (58 of 4,757 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 1.00 · 5.9% (6 of 102 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.92 · 13.6% (3 of 22 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 0.77 · 1.3% (16 of 1,191 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 0.71 · 1.2% (15 of 1,225 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 0.69 · 1.5% (10 of 662 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.63 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Zellix, Sanity Flayer relevance 0.63 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.58 · 1.6% (6 of 376 decks)
- Guru Pathik relevance 0.57 · 3.3% (3 of 91 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.54 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 0.53 · 1.2% (7 of 584 decks)
- Master Chef // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.53 · 2.0% (4 of 204 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.51 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Clan Crafter relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.40 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (2 of 84 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.39 · 2.4% (2 of 84 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.37 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.33 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.29 · 31.3% (292 of 934 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.08 · 34.6% (323 of 934 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.06 · 27.8% (260 of 934 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.00 · 24.2% (226 of 934 decks)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.92 · 21.9% (205 of 934 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.89 · 21.8% (204 of 934 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.87 · 19.8% (185 of 934 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.85 · 26.2% (245 of 934 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.85 · 36.2% (338 of 934 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.81 · 35.9% (335 of 934 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.80 · 34.8% (325 of 934 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.79 · 20.1% (188 of 934 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (196 of 934 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.79 · 36.7% (343 of 934 decks)
- Six relevance 0.76 · 19.0% (177 of 934 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.74 · 54.0% (504 of 934 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.72 · 25.9% (242 of 934 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 0.72 · 13.5% (126 of 934 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.71 · 15.5% (145 of 934 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.71 · 22.6% (211 of 934 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.69 · 36.1% (337 of 934 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.67 · 14.3% (134 of 934 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.67 · 25.5% (238 of 934 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.67 · 16.5% (154 of 934 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.66 · 34.7% (324 of 934 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.66 · 24.7% (231 of 934 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.63 · 16.4% (153 of 934 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.63 · 30.7% (287 of 934 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.62 · 14.7% (137 of 934 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.62 · 23.4% (219 of 934 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.29 · 31.3% (292 of 934 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.08 · 34.6% (323 of 934 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.00 · 24.2% (226 of 934 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.81 · 35.9% (335 of 934 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.80 · 34.8% (325 of 934 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.79 · 21.0% (196 of 934 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.79 · 36.7% (343 of 934 decks)
- Six relevance 0.76 · 19.0% (177 of 934 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.74 · 54.0% (504 of 934 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.72 · 25.9% (242 of 934 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 0.72 · 13.5% (126 of 934 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.71 · 15.5% (145 of 934 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.69 · 36.1% (337 of 934 decks)
- Blossoming Tortoise relevance 0.67 · 14.3% (134 of 934 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.67 · 25.5% (238 of 934 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.67 · 16.5% (154 of 934 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.66 · 34.7% (324 of 934 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.66 · 24.7% (231 of 934 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.63 · 30.7% (287 of 934 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.62 · 14.7% (137 of 934 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.61 · 22.4% (209 of 934 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.60 · 28.6% (267 of 934 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.59 · 22.9% (214 of 934 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (159 of 934 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.58 · 18.6% (174 of 934 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.57 · 20.4% (191 of 934 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 0.56 · 17.2% (161 of 934 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.56 · 12.8% (120 of 934 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 0.55 · 12.0% (112 of 934 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.87 · 19.8% (185 of 934 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.85 · 26.2% (245 of 934 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.79 · 20.1% (188 of 934 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Glacierwood Siege relevance 0.92 · 21.9% (205 of 934 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.71 · 22.6% (211 of 934 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.62 · 14.8% (138 of 934 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.58 · 25.7% (240 of 934 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 0.85 · 36.2% (338 of 934 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.62 · 23.4% (219 of 934 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.59 · 26.4% (247 of 934 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.56 · 16.3% (152 of 934 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.06 · 27.8% (260 of 934 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.89 · 21.8% (204 of 934 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.63 · 16.4% (153 of 934 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.60 · 15.4% (144 of 934 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.57 · 17.3% (162 of 934 decks)
All lands (5)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.67 · 16.2% (151 of 934 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.66 · 41.0% (383 of 934 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.65 · 40.5% (378 of 934 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.59 · 35.7% (333 of 934 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.55 · 16.3% (152 of 934 decks)
EDH data for Will of the Sultai: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 934 real decks.