Will of the Sultai
Played in 750 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Naya
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (13)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.64 · 8.4% (314 of 3,722 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.18 · 3.0% (129 of 4,371 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.01 · 3.5% (65 of 1,836 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.26 · 1.9% (27 of 1,394 decks)
- Eivor, Wolf-Kissed relevance 0.98 · 1.7% (15 of 899 decks)
- Prava of the Steel Legion // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.49 · 2.9% (2 of 70 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.46 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.26 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
- Keleth, Sunmane Familiar // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.21 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.20 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.19 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.19 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (27)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 2.09 · 49.1% (368 of 750 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.93 · 59.6% (447 of 750 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.79 · 48.0% (360 of 750 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.65 · 41.6% (312 of 750 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.57 · 37.2% (279 of 750 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.56 · 43.2% (324 of 750 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.50 · 42.5% (319 of 750 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.45 · 43.5% (326 of 750 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.43 · 38.5% (289 of 750 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.41 · 39.6% (297 of 750 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 1.39 · 33.3% (250 of 750 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.35 · 41.3% (310 of 750 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.30 · 33.1% (248 of 750 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.29 · 28.8% (216 of 750 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.29 · 38.8% (291 of 750 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.28 · 34.7% (260 of 750 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.27 · 48.5% (364 of 750 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.25 · 44.5% (334 of 750 decks)
- Six relevance 1.23 · 29.5% (221 of 750 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.22 · 37.2% (279 of 750 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.22 · 29.9% (224 of 750 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 1.21 · 26.8% (201 of 750 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.20 · 45.6% (342 of 750 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.19 · 37.1% (278 of 750 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.17 · 25.9% (194 of 750 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 1.16 · 24.7% (185 of 750 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.09 · 37.3% (280 of 750 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 2.09 · 49.1% (368 of 750 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.93 · 59.6% (447 of 750 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.57 · 37.2% (279 of 750 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.56 · 43.2% (324 of 750 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.45 · 43.5% (326 of 750 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.43 · 38.5% (289 of 750 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.41 · 39.6% (297 of 750 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 1.39 · 33.3% (250 of 750 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.35 · 41.3% (310 of 750 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.25 · 44.5% (334 of 750 decks)
- Six relevance 1.23 · 29.5% (221 of 750 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.22 · 37.2% (279 of 750 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.22 · 29.9% (224 of 750 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.19 · 37.1% (278 of 750 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.17 · 25.9% (194 of 750 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 1.16 · 24.7% (185 of 750 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 1.09 · 37.3% (280 of 750 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.28 · 34.7% (260 of 750 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.27 · 48.5% (364 of 750 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.79 · 48.0% (360 of 750 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.29 · 38.8% (291 of 750 decks)
All instants (1)
- Harrow relevance 1.20 · 45.6% (342 of 750 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.65 · 41.6% (312 of 750 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.50 · 42.5% (319 of 750 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.30 · 33.1% (248 of 750 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.29 · 28.8% (216 of 750 decks)
- Worldsoul's Rage relevance 1.21 · 26.8% (201 of 750 decks)
All utility lands (17)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.96 · 56.5% (424 of 750 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.95 · 57.7% (433 of 750 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.95 · 57.3% (430 of 750 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.95 · 56.9% (427 of 750 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 1.93 · 56.8% (426 of 750 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.92 · 55.9% (419 of 750 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.91 · 56.1% (421 of 750 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.91 · 54.5% (409 of 750 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 1.90 · 54.5% (409 of 750 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.75 · 47.6% (357 of 750 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 1.38 · 38.3% (287 of 750 decks)
- Sandstorm Verge relevance 1.27 · 30.7% (230 of 750 decks)
- Endless Sands relevance 1.25 · 30.1% (226 of 750 decks)
- Grasping Dunes relevance 1.16 · 28.0% (210 of 750 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 1.13 · 28.0% (210 of 750 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 1.11 · 49.7% (373 of 750 decks)
- Desert relevance 1.06 · 26.8% (201 of 750 decks)
All lands (6)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.85 · 58.4% (438 of 750 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 1.83 · 57.6% (432 of 750 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.81 · 56.9% (427 of 750 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.73 · 49.2% (369 of 750 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.64 · 44.7% (335 of 750 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 1.53 · 40.0% (300 of 750 decks)
EDH data for Will of the Sultai: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 750 real decks.