Will of the Sultai
Played in 3,392 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
9.4% Green
All commanders (30)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 3.04 · 14.1% (1,417 of 10,019 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.98 · 16.7% (82 of 490 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 1.89 · 16.7% (67 of 401 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.76 · 6.5% (403 of 6,221 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.73 · 9.7% (126 of 1,302 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 1.69 · 15.4% (49 of 319 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 1.56 · 9.8% (77 of 784 decks)
- Six relevance 1.56 · 7.5% (140 of 1,878 decks)
- Strong, the Brutish Thespian relevance 1.40 · 9.9% (48 of 484 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 1.33 · 7.0% (76 of 1,085 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 1.30 · 7.1% (68 of 964 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.97 · 7.4% (21 of 282 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 0.78 · 2.5% (97 of 3,865 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.76 · 66.7% (2 of 3 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.71 · 3.5% (29 of 825 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.70 · 2.2% (94 of 4,343 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 0.62 · 2.8% (29 of 1,035 decks)
- Autumn Willow, Harmony relevance 0.60 · 8.5% (5 of 59 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 0.59 · 3.6% (15 of 418 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.52 · 2.3% (26 of 1,143 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.51 · 2.0% (33 of 1,661 decks)
- Jermane, Pride of the Circus relevance 0.45 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 0.45 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.44 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.43 · 1.4% (49 of 3,629 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 0.42 · 5.1% (4 of 78 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 0.42 · 3.6% (6 of 165 decks)
- Ayumi, the Last Visitor relevance 0.40 · 6.4% (3 of 47 decks)
- Altanak, the Thrice-Called relevance 0.39 · 9.5% (2 of 21 decks)
- Medusa, Inhuman Queen relevance 0.38 · 4.3% (4 of 93 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Harrow relevance 1.14 · 63.1% (2,142 of 3,392 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.11 · 41.9% (1,421 of 3,392 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.08 · 35.0% (1,186 of 3,392 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.04 · 37.0% (1,255 of 3,392 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.03 · 46.1% (1,563 of 3,392 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 1.03 · 56.2% (1,907 of 3,392 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 1.02 · 28.4% (965 of 3,392 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.02 · 38.4% (1,302 of 3,392 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.98 · 27.8% (943 of 3,392 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.95 · 49.7% (1,687 of 3,392 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.94 · 34.3% (1,165 of 3,392 decks)
- Skyclave Pick-Axe relevance 0.93 · 25.1% (851 of 3,392 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.92 · 32.3% (1,095 of 3,392 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.90 · 38.2% (1,296 of 3,392 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.88 · 32.3% (1,096 of 3,392 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.86 · 32.8% (1,112 of 3,392 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.86 · 28.9% (980 of 3,392 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.86 · 45.0% (1,528 of 3,392 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.83 · 26.8% (908 of 3,392 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.82 · 33.0% (1,120 of 3,392 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.81 · 40.9% (1,388 of 3,392 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.80 · 35.2% (1,193 of 3,392 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.80 · 41.8% (1,418 of 3,392 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.80 · 27.9% (948 of 3,392 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.79 · 35.1% (1,190 of 3,392 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.79 · 28.0% (950 of 3,392 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.79 · 28.2% (955 of 3,392 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.77 · 38.5% (1,306 of 3,392 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.74 · 43.5% (1,475 of 3,392 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.72 · 24.9% (844 of 3,392 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.04 · 37.0% (1,255 of 3,392 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.03 · 46.1% (1,563 of 3,392 decks)
- Summon: Titan relevance 1.02 · 28.4% (965 of 3,392 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.02 · 38.4% (1,302 of 3,392 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.95 · 49.7% (1,687 of 3,392 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.94 · 34.3% (1,165 of 3,392 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.90 · 38.2% (1,296 of 3,392 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.88 · 32.3% (1,096 of 3,392 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.86 · 45.0% (1,528 of 3,392 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.82 · 33.0% (1,120 of 3,392 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.81 · 40.9% (1,388 of 3,392 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.80 · 35.2% (1,193 of 3,392 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.80 · 41.8% (1,418 of 3,392 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.79 · 35.1% (1,190 of 3,392 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.77 · 38.5% (1,306 of 3,392 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.72 · 37.6% (1,275 of 3,392 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.70 · 42.9% (1,454 of 3,392 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.69 · 22.9% (776 of 3,392 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.67 · 28.2% (956 of 3,392 decks)
All artifacts (7)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.98 · 27.8% (943 of 3,392 decks)
- Skyclave Pick-Axe relevance 0.93 · 25.1% (851 of 3,392 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.92 · 32.3% (1,095 of 3,392 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.86 · 32.8% (1,112 of 3,392 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.80 · 27.9% (948 of 3,392 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.72 · 27.0% (917 of 3,392 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.71 · 25.7% (871 of 3,392 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.86 · 28.9% (980 of 3,392 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.79 · 28.2% (955 of 3,392 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.66 · 35.2% (1,195 of 3,392 decks)
All instants (6)
- Harrow relevance 1.14 · 63.1% (2,142 of 3,392 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 1.11 · 41.9% (1,421 of 3,392 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 1.03 · 56.2% (1,907 of 3,392 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.83 · 26.8% (908 of 3,392 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.74 · 43.5% (1,475 of 3,392 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.66 · 22.5% (764 of 3,392 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.08 · 35.0% (1,186 of 3,392 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.79 · 28.0% (950 of 3,392 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.72 · 24.9% (844 of 3,392 decks)
- Scale Up relevance 0.68 · 18.8% (639 of 3,392 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.65 · 19.3% (654 of 3,392 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.87 · 30.8% (1,044 of 3,392 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.72 · 43.8% (1,486 of 3,392 decks)
All lands (8)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 1.06 · 52.5% (1,781 of 3,392 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 1.06 · 37.7% (1,280 of 3,392 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 1.04 · 37.8% (1,282 of 3,392 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 1.04 · 55.3% (1,875 of 3,392 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 1.04 · 53.6% (1,817 of 3,392 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 1.01 · 35.2% (1,194 of 3,392 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.67 · 29.2% (992 of 3,392 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.64 · 20.1% (681 of 3,392 decks)
EDH data for Will of the Sultai: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,392 real decks.