Harrow
Played in 32,509 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 2.82 · 72.1% (7,260 of 10,066 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.31 · 79.4% (1,037 of 1,306 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 2.23 · 78.6% (856 of 1,089 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 2.07 · 52.9% (2,053 of 3,881 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 1.98 · 70.1% (552 of 788 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.83 · 57.1% (655 of 1,148 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 1.81 · 57.4% (598 of 1,042 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 1.70 · 38.8% (1,690 of 4,354 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.69 · 54.5% (452 of 829 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.58 · 32.8% (2,045 of 6,240 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 1.57 · 64.5% (182 of 282 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.44 · 49.6% (245 of 494 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 1.34 · 38.4% (371 of 966 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 1.33 · 49.8% (159 of 319 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.27 · 29.4% (718 of 2,442 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.20 · 29.4% (491 of 1,670 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.18 · 29.1% (468 of 1,610 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.18 · 24.8% (901 of 3,637 decks)
- Avatar Kyoshi, Earthbender relevance 1.17 · 33.0% (279 of 845 decks)
- Ka-Zar of the Savage Land relevance 1.13 · 58.8% (50 of 85 decks)
- Michelangelo, On the Scene relevance 1.11 · 44.1% (90 of 204 decks)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.05 · 56.0% (42 of 75 decks)
- Jolrael, Empress of Beasts relevance 1.02 · 42.2% (70 of 166 decks)
- Haru, Hidden Talent relevance 1.01 · 49.5% (47 of 95 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.97 · 28.2% (172 of 610 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.90 · 28.9% (112 of 388 decks)
- The Boulder, Ready to Rumble relevance 0.79 · 29.0% (61 of 210 decks)
- Groundchuck & Dirtbag relevance 0.79 · 30.2% (55 of 182 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 0.79 · 24.4% (98 of 402 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 0.78 · 14.4% (726 of 5,044 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.95 · 35.8% (11,643 of 32,509 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.92 · 49.9% (16,229 of 32,509 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.83 · 43.2% (14,036 of 32,509 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.80 · 34.1% (11,096 of 32,509 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.79 · 39.7% (12,902 of 32,509 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.78 · 29.2% (9,491 of 32,509 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.76 · 39.8% (12,937 of 32,509 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.75 · 37.5% (12,179 of 32,509 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.73 · 29.6% (9,633 of 32,509 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.72 · 37.6% (12,211 of 32,509 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.68 · 35.9% (11,668 of 32,509 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.68 · 41.5% (13,482 of 32,509 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.66 · 40.1% (13,037 of 32,509 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.66 · 24.0% (7,786 of 32,509 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.65 · 31.6% (10,267 of 32,509 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.65 · 28.8% (9,351 of 32,509 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.63 · 37.3% (12,113 of 32,509 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 33.6% (10,914 of 32,509 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.61 · 29.5% (9,582 of 32,509 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 22.9% (7,453 of 32,509 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.60 · 20.5% (6,676 of 32,509 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.60 · 33.8% (10,980 of 32,509 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.60 · 25.2% (8,178 of 32,509 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.59 · 26.0% (8,466 of 32,509 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.58 · 25.5% (8,277 of 32,509 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.57 · 20.4% (6,627 of 32,509 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.56 · 20.6% (6,713 of 32,509 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (5,939 of 32,509 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.56 · 19.4% (6,292 of 32,509 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.52 · 17.4% (5,661 of 32,509 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.83 · 43.2% (14,036 of 32,509 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.80 · 34.1% (11,096 of 32,509 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.79 · 39.7% (12,902 of 32,509 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.78 · 29.2% (9,491 of 32,509 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.76 · 39.8% (12,937 of 32,509 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.75 · 37.5% (12,179 of 32,509 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.73 · 29.6% (9,633 of 32,509 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.72 · 37.6% (12,211 of 32,509 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.68 · 35.9% (11,668 of 32,509 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.66 · 40.1% (13,037 of 32,509 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.66 · 24.0% (7,786 of 32,509 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.65 · 31.6% (10,267 of 32,509 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.65 · 28.8% (9,351 of 32,509 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.61 · 29.5% (9,582 of 32,509 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.60 · 25.2% (8,178 of 32,509 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.59 · 26.0% (8,466 of 32,509 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.58 · 25.5% (8,277 of 32,509 decks)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.56 · 20.6% (6,713 of 32,509 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.51 · 25.6% (8,336 of 32,509 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.47 · 19.2% (6,247 of 32,509 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.46 · 18.1% (5,885 of 32,509 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 22.9% (7,453 of 32,509 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.50 · 18.1% (5,899 of 32,509 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.49 · 16.6% (5,404 of 32,509 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (5,602 of 32,509 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.48 · 13.5% (4,392 of 32,509 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 33.6% (10,914 of 32,509 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.52 · 17.4% (5,661 of 32,509 decks)
All instants (5)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.95 · 35.8% (11,643 of 32,509 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.92 · 49.9% (16,229 of 32,509 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.63 · 37.3% (12,113 of 32,509 decks)
- Cycle of Renewal relevance 0.60 · 20.5% (6,676 of 32,509 decks)
- Tifa's Limit Break relevance 0.48 · 15.5% (5,025 of 32,509 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Explore relevance 0.68 · 41.5% (13,482 of 32,509 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.60 · 33.8% (10,980 of 32,509 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.57 · 20.4% (6,627 of 32,509 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (5,939 of 32,509 decks)
- Planar Engineering relevance 0.56 · 19.4% (6,292 of 32,509 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.49 · 38.3% (12,447 of 32,509 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.66 · 40.6% (13,191 of 32,509 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.56 · 19.8% (6,434 of 32,509 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.47 · 20.0% (6,504 of 32,509 decks)
All lands (8)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.87 · 43.3% (14,068 of 32,509 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.87 · 46.4% (15,074 of 32,509 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.79 · 40.8% (13,274 of 32,509 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.69 · 25.2% (8,179 of 32,509 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.68 · 24.3% (7,915 of 32,509 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.64 · 22.2% (7,214 of 32,509 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.47 · 20.5% (6,675 of 32,509 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.46 · 14.5% (4,707 of 32,509 decks)
EDH data for Harrow: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 32,509 real decks.