Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.81 · 50.4% (4,634 of 9,190 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.29 · 3.1% (322 of 10,268 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.07 · 1.9% (8 of 420 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Donna Noble relevance 0.03 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.60 · 77.7% (3,873 of 4,987 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.56 · 81.4% (4,058 of 4,987 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.55 · 80.6% (4,019 of 4,987 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.49 · 78.4% (3,908 of 4,987 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.47 · 76.1% (3,795 of 4,987 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.44 · 72.3% (3,606 of 4,987 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.41 · 69.1% (3,446 of 4,987 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.40 · 60.3% (3,006 of 4,987 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.36 · 86.2% (4,301 of 4,987 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.36 · 65.8% (3,281 of 4,987 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.34 · 60.7% (3,029 of 4,987 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.32 · 52.5% (2,620 of 4,987 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.29 · 53.4% (2,661 of 4,987 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.28 · 76.0% (3,790 of 4,987 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.28 · 55.2% (2,755 of 4,987 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.25 · 61.3% (3,058 of 4,987 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.25 · 55.3% (2,760 of 4,987 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.24 · 61.8% (3,081 of 4,987 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.20 · 47.5% (2,371 of 4,987 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.16 · 45.2% (2,252 of 4,987 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.13 · 40.0% (1,997 of 4,987 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.12 · 41.2% (2,055 of 4,987 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.11 · 45.0% (2,246 of 4,987 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.07 · 40.9% (2,039 of 4,987 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.05 · 38.2% (1,906 of 4,987 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.04 · 38.4% (1,913 of 4,987 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.03 · 36.8% (1,833 of 4,987 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.02 · 35.8% (1,783 of 4,987 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.01 · 36.6% (1,825 of 4,987 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.97 · 54.7% (2,730 of 4,987 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.60 · 77.7% (3,873 of 4,987 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.56 · 81.4% (4,058 of 4,987 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.55 · 80.6% (4,019 of 4,987 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.49 · 78.4% (3,908 of 4,987 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.47 · 76.1% (3,795 of 4,987 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.44 · 72.3% (3,606 of 4,987 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.41 · 69.1% (3,446 of 4,987 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.40 · 60.3% (3,006 of 4,987 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.36 · 86.2% (4,301 of 4,987 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.34 · 60.7% (3,029 of 4,987 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.29 · 53.4% (2,661 of 4,987 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.28 · 76.0% (3,790 of 4,987 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.28 · 55.2% (2,755 of 4,987 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.24 · 61.8% (3,081 of 4,987 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.20 · 47.5% (2,371 of 4,987 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.16 · 45.2% (2,252 of 4,987 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.11 · 45.0% (2,246 of 4,987 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.07 · 40.9% (2,039 of 4,987 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.04 · 38.4% (1,913 of 4,987 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.03 · 36.8% (1,833 of 4,987 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.96 · 35.9% (1,791 of 4,987 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.93 · 30.3% (1,513 of 4,987 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.91 · 32.8% (1,637 of 4,987 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.90 · 36.4% (1,817 of 4,987 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.88 · 29.3% (1,463 of 4,987 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.87 · 29.4% (1,464 of 4,987 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.83 · 27.4% (1,367 of 4,987 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.80 · 28.8% (1,434 of 4,987 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.76 · 25.3% (1,260 of 4,987 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines relevance 0.75 · 25.1% (1,253 of 4,987 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.32 · 52.5% (2,620 of 4,987 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.12 · 41.2% (2,055 of 4,987 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.36 · 65.8% (3,281 of 4,987 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.25 · 61.3% (3,058 of 4,987 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.05 · 38.2% (1,906 of 4,987 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.01 · 36.6% (1,825 of 4,987 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.93 · 32.2% (1,607 of 4,987 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 1.25 · 55.3% (2,760 of 4,987 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.97 · 54.7% (2,730 of 4,987 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.89 · 31.0% (1,544 of 4,987 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.82 · 35.1% (1,748 of 4,987 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.13 · 40.0% (1,997 of 4,987 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.02 · 35.8% (1,783 of 4,987 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.79 · 47.0% (2,345 of 4,987 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.77 · 32.8% (1,635 of 4,987 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.04 · 40.3% (2,010 of 4,987 decks)
All lands (4)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 1.05 · 52.2% (2,604 of 4,987 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.97 · 45.2% (2,254 of 4,987 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.91 · 41.4% (2,067 of 4,987 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.81 · 57.0% (2,842 of 4,987 decks)
EDH data for Ramunap Excavator: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,987 real decks.