Color Identity Spread
3030+22+3+3+4+4+6+8+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 3.46 · 54.9% (5,095 of 9,276 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 3.01 · 45.1% (3,164 of 7,020 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.57 · 37.4% (1,775 of 4,744 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 2.54 · 33.5% (2,376 of 7,089 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.24 · 45.2% (398 of 880 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 1.84 · 36.5% (226 of 620 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 1.76 · 25.3% (489 of 1,932 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.57 · 24.4% (282 of 1,154 decks)
- Jolrael, Voice of Zhalfir relevance 1.53 · 24.8% (231 of 932 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.51 · 22.9% (275 of 1,199 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 1.50 · 26.6% (175 of 659 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 1.12 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 1.11 · 18.2% (106 of 582 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 0.86 · 11.1% (135 of 1,216 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 0.77 · 13.3% (50 of 376 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.73 · 21.7% (15 of 69 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Clan Crafter relevance 0.71 · 66.7% (4 of 6 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.68 · 12.0% (39 of 324 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 0.67 · 7.8% (126 of 1,608 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.58 · 33.3% (5 of 15 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.57 · 21.1% (8 of 38 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.55 · 7.3% (65 of 891 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.50 · 6.3% (67 of 1,063 decks)
- Ignis Scientia relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (9 of 133 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.28 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 0.28 · 3.5% (41 of 1,187 decks)
- Kaseto, Orochi Archmage relevance 0.27 · 4.5% (19 of 422 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.23 · 14.3% (2 of 14 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg // The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.23 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.43 · 55.4% (8,912 of 16,088 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.39 · 61.3% (9,864 of 16,088 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.35 · 70.7% (11,375 of 16,088 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.32 · 47.5% (7,634 of 16,088 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.30 · 61.9% (9,952 of 16,088 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.23 · 60.4% (9,712 of 16,088 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.17 · 51.0% (8,199 of 16,088 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.15 · 43.3% (6,974 of 16,088 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.03 · 74.5% (11,979 of 16,088 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.96 · 35.3% (5,680 of 16,088 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.96 · 44.8% (7,212 of 16,088 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 27.4% (4,409 of 16,088 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.94 · 40.4% (6,500 of 16,088 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.93 · 41.3% (6,642 of 16,088 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.92 · 28.3% (4,556 of 16,088 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.92 · 41.3% (6,651 of 16,088 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.86 · 32.7% (5,265 of 16,088 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.81 · 25.8% (4,155 of 16,088 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.79 · 26.3% (4,233 of 16,088 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.77 · 29.3% (4,720 of 16,088 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.75 · 39.2% (6,314 of 16,088 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.74 · 23.5% (3,785 of 16,088 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.72 · 27.7% (4,453 of 16,088 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.72 · 20.0% (3,211 of 16,088 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.72 · 43.1% (6,926 of 16,088 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.71 · 20.2% (3,243 of 16,088 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.71 · 36.5% (5,867 of 16,088 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.70 · 26.8% (4,314 of 16,088 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.70 · 21.1% (3,400 of 16,088 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.70 · 25.5% (4,110 of 16,088 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.43 · 55.4% (8,912 of 16,088 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.39 · 61.3% (9,864 of 16,088 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.35 · 70.7% (11,375 of 16,088 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.32 · 47.5% (7,634 of 16,088 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.30 · 61.9% (9,952 of 16,088 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.23 · 60.4% (9,712 of 16,088 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.17 · 51.0% (8,199 of 16,088 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.15 · 43.3% (6,974 of 16,088 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.03 · 74.5% (11,979 of 16,088 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.96 · 35.3% (5,680 of 16,088 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.96 · 44.8% (7,212 of 16,088 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.86 · 32.7% (5,265 of 16,088 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.79 · 26.3% (4,233 of 16,088 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.75 · 39.2% (6,314 of 16,088 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.74 · 23.5% (3,785 of 16,088 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.72 · 20.0% (3,211 of 16,088 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.71 · 20.2% (3,243 of 16,088 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.71 · 36.5% (5,867 of 16,088 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.70 · 21.1% (3,400 of 16,088 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.69 · 24.6% (3,954 of 16,088 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.67 · 22.1% (3,559 of 16,088 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.66 · 18.3% (2,949 of 16,088 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 27.4% (4,409 of 16,088 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.92 · 28.3% (4,556 of 16,088 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.69 · 20.9% (3,362 of 16,088 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Exploration relevance 0.93 · 41.3% (6,642 of 16,088 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.77 · 29.3% (4,720 of 16,088 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.70 · 25.5% (4,110 of 16,088 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 0.94 · 40.4% (6,500 of 16,088 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.92 · 41.3% (6,651 of 16,088 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.72 · 43.1% (6,926 of 16,088 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.70 · 26.8% (4,314 of 16,088 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.81 · 25.8% (4,155 of 16,088 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.72 · 27.7% (4,453 of 16,088 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.66 · 18.1% (2,917 of 16,088 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.65 · 17.2% (2,762 of 16,088 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.83 · 28.5% (4,584 of 16,088 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.72 · 41.4% (6,667 of 16,088 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.70 · 20.5% (3,294 of 16,088 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.68 · 23.9% (3,843 of 16,088 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.68 · 20.7% (3,332 of 16,088 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.65 · 18.3% (2,940 of 16,088 decks)
All lands (8)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.86 · 28.8% (4,635 of 16,088 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.83 · 51.4% (8,262 of 16,088 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.80 · 48.2% (7,753 of 16,088 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.79 · 25.5% (4,099 of 16,088 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.70 · 43.5% (7,000 of 16,088 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.69 · 19.5% (3,134 of 16,088 decks)
- Cloudpost relevance 0.69 · 19.7% (3,167 of 16,088 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 0.66 · 17.7% (2,853 of 16,088 decks)
EDH data for Ramunap Excavator: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 16,088 real decks.















































































