1830+19+3+2+1+8+11+6+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Yuma, Proud Protector 77.8% of decks
Yuma, Proud Protector 77.8% of decks
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 38.9% of decks
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 38.9% of decks
Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor 34.5% of decks
Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor 34.5% of decks
Kirri, Talented Sprout 20.8% of decks
Kirri, Talented Sprout 20.8% of decks
Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 42.9% of decks
Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 42.9% of decks
Hazezon Tamar 20.4% of decks
Hazezon Tamar 20.4% of decks
Most Relevant
Ancient Greenwarden 68.7% of decks
Ancient Greenwarden 68.7% of decks
Dune Chanter 66.6% of decks
Dune Chanter 66.6% of decks
Oracle of Mul Daya 63.7% of decks
Oracle of Mul Daya 63.7% of decks
Titania, Protector of Argoth 60.0% of decks
Titania, Protector of Argoth 60.0% of decks
Map the Frontier 53.5% of decks
Map the Frontier 53.5% of decks
Sand Scout 50.3% of decks
Sand Scout 50.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (18)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 5.03 · 77.8% (2,892 of 3,715 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 3.77 · 38.9% (1,697 of 4,362 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 3.13 · 34.5% (632 of 1,831 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 2.25 · 20.8% (282 of 1,358 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 1.97 · 42.9% (42 of 98 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 1.72 · 20.4% (76 of 372 decks)
- Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 1.00 · 3.4% (909 of 27,112 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.64 · 3.3% (84 of 2,564 decks)
- Eivor, Wolf-Kissed relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (28 of 887 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.33 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 79 decks)
- Samut, Voice of Dissent relevance 0.18 · 1.3% (13 of 1,031 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.17 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Annie Flash, the Veteran relevance 0.14 · 1.3% (6 of 473 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 81 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.07 · 1.1% (2 of 179 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.04 · 1.1% (1 of 91 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.04 · 1.1% (1 of 92 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.24 · 68.7% (4,817 of 7,012 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 2.15 · 66.6% (4,672 of 7,012 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.10 · 63.7% (4,466 of 7,012 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.00 · 60.0% (4,204 of 7,012 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.88 · 53.5% (3,749 of 7,012 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.87 · 50.3% (3,526 of 7,012 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 1.75 · 41.9% (2,938 of 7,012 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.74 · 46.1% (3,235 of 7,012 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.69 · 40.2% (2,817 of 7,012 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.68 · 59.9% (4,203 of 7,012 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.67 · 52.3% (3,670 of 7,012 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.65 · 40.3% (2,823 of 7,012 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.64 · 62.2% (4,360 of 7,012 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.61 · 43.2% (3,028 of 7,012 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.56 · 67.4% (4,728 of 7,012 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.56 · 52.1% (3,656 of 7,012 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.53 · 38.6% (2,705 of 7,012 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.52 · 42.1% (2,951 of 7,012 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 1.52 · 36.2% (2,539 of 7,012 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 1.40 · 32.7% (2,293 of 7,012 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 1.39 · 31.9% (2,240 of 7,012 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.39 · 37.6% (2,636 of 7,012 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.36 · 34.8% (2,437 of 7,012 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.32 · 50.6% (3,551 of 7,012 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.32 · 28.5% (2,000 of 7,012 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.29 · 28.0% (1,965 of 7,012 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 1.29 · 31.8% (2,232 of 7,012 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 1.28 · 28.9% (2,024 of 7,012 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.21 · 28.6% (2,002 of 7,012 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.21 · 47.0% (3,295 of 7,012 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 2.24 · 68.7% (4,817 of 7,012 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 2.15 · 66.6% (4,672 of 7,012 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 2.10 · 63.7% (4,466 of 7,012 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 2.00 · 60.0% (4,204 of 7,012 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 1.87 · 50.3% (3,526 of 7,012 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 1.75 · 41.9% (2,938 of 7,012 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 1.69 · 40.2% (2,817 of 7,012 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.68 · 59.9% (4,203 of 7,012 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.67 · 52.3% (3,670 of 7,012 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 1.65 · 40.3% (2,823 of 7,012 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.56 · 67.4% (4,728 of 7,012 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.56 · 52.1% (3,656 of 7,012 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 1.52 · 42.1% (2,951 of 7,012 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 1.32 · 28.5% (2,000 of 7,012 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 1.29 · 28.0% (1,965 of 7,012 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.21 · 28.6% (2,002 of 7,012 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.21 · 47.0% (3,295 of 7,012 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 1.20 · 26.2% (1,835 of 7,012 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.15 · 32.0% (2,243 of 7,012 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.39 · 37.6% (2,636 of 7,012 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.32 · 50.6% (3,551 of 7,012 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.20 · 30.7% (2,156 of 7,012 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Desert Warfare relevance 1.61 · 43.2% (3,028 of 7,012 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 1.29 · 31.8% (2,232 of 7,012 decks)
All instants (1)
- Harrow relevance 1.64 · 62.2% (4,360 of 7,012 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Map the Frontier relevance 1.88 · 53.5% (3,749 of 7,012 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.74 · 46.1% (3,235 of 7,012 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.53 · 38.6% (2,705 of 7,012 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 1.52 · 36.2% (2,539 of 7,012 decks)
- Cataclysmic Prospecting relevance 1.40 · 32.7% (2,293 of 7,012 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 1.39 · 31.9% (2,240 of 7,012 decks)
- Nahiri's Lithoforming relevance 1.36 · 34.8% (2,437 of 7,012 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 1.28 · 28.9% (2,024 of 7,012 decks)
All utility lands (11)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 2.20 · 64.7% (4,538 of 7,012 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 2.20 · 65.0% (4,559 of 7,012 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 2.19 · 64.1% (4,497 of 7,012 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 2.18 · 64.3% (4,507 of 7,012 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 2.18 · 63.6% (4,460 of 7,012 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 2.18 · 64.3% (4,510 of 7,012 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 2.17 · 62.0% (4,347 of 7,012 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 2.14 · 61.9% (4,343 of 7,012 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 2.05 · 58.7% (4,119 of 7,012 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 1.50 · 40.9% (2,868 of 7,012 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 1.30 · 58.5% (4,105 of 7,012 decks)
All lands (6)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 2.01 · 63.4% (4,444 of 7,012 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 2.00 · 63.1% (4,422 of 7,012 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 1.98 · 56.3% (3,948 of 7,012 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 1.97 · 61.9% (4,338 of 7,012 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 1.94 · 52.7% (3,695 of 7,012 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 1.28 · 33.4% (2,344 of 7,012 decks)
EDH data for Ramunap Excavator: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 7,012 real decks.

























































