Color Identity Spread
12.6% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 2.44 · 57.1% (2,091 of 3,664 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 2.28 · 55.5% (1,363 of 2,454 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 2.03 · 41.2% (1,802 of 4,376 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 2.00 · 54.6% (598 of 1,095 decks)
- Titania, Voice of Gaea relevance 1.98 · 58.2% (464 of 797 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.97 · 48.2% (812 of 1,684 decks)
- The Earth King relevance 1.86 · 44.9% (705 of 1,569 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 1.85 · 47.8% (553 of 1,156 decks)
- Nissa, Worldsoul Speaker relevance 1.80 · 46.9% (491 of 1,048 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.76 · 43.2% (568 of 1,316 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 1.70 · 55.5% (217 of 391 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.68 · 44.9% (376 of 838 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.63 · 36.9% (598 of 1,620 decks)
- Six relevance 1.61 · 34.8% (659 of 1,894 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 1.52 · 25.5% (1,596 of 6,264 decks)
- Mole Man, Moloid Master relevance 1.47 · 41.9% (213 of 508 decks)
- Tifa Lockhart relevance 1.40 · 21.0% (2,129 of 10,129 decks)
- Bugenhagen, Wise Elder relevance 1.35 · 36.9% (196 of 531 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 1.34 · 31.7% (305 of 963 decks)
- Toph, Earthbending Master relevance 1.33 · 23.2% (906 of 3,902 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 1.31 · 42.0% (119 of 283 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 1.24 · 31.6% (196 of 620 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 1.18 · 35.4% (110 of 311 decks)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 1.16 · 31.9% (135 of 423 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Mana relevance 1.15 · 18.4% (934 of 5,083 decks)
- Sandman, Shifting Scoundrel relevance 1.13 · 33.4% (107 of 320 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.12 · 47.4% (46 of 97 decks)
- Captain Kathryn Janeway relevance 1.10 · 53.1% (34 of 64 decks)
- Vorinclex // The Grand Evolution relevance 1.09 · 25.1% (204 of 813 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.06 · 21.0% (323 of 1,535 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.10 · 57.9% (14,796 of 25,568 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.09 · 54.5% (13,936 of 25,568 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.85 · 36.0% (9,215 of 25,568 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.83 · 43.5% (11,116 of 25,568 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.80 · 42.2% (10,783 of 25,568 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.79 · 39.1% (9,993 of 25,568 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.77 · 32.3% (8,260 of 25,568 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.74 · 38.8% (9,908 of 25,568 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.73 · 40.5% (10,343 of 25,568 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.72 · 34.7% (8,875 of 25,568 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.72 · 28.9% (7,382 of 25,568 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.66 · 25.7% (6,578 of 25,568 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.63 · 31.5% (8,066 of 25,568 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.63 · 20.5% (5,239 of 25,568 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.62 · 37.8% (9,676 of 25,568 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.61 · 32.3% (8,255 of 25,568 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.60 · 20.8% (5,309 of 25,568 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 22.6% (5,790 of 25,568 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.59 · 26.2% (6,711 of 25,568 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.59 · 28.7% (7,329 of 25,568 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.58 · 31.7% (8,105 of 25,568 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (4,377 of 25,568 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.56 · 20.1% (5,132 of 25,568 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.55 · 21.6% (5,516 of 25,568 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.54 · 16.5% (4,207 of 25,568 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.54 · 20.3% (5,191 of 25,568 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.54 · 36.4% (9,313 of 25,568 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.53 · 23.5% (6,004 of 25,568 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.52 · 30.8% (7,869 of 25,568 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.52 · 15.9% (4,066 of 25,568 decks)
All creatures (28)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.10 · 57.9% (14,796 of 25,568 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.09 · 54.5% (13,936 of 25,568 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.85 · 36.0% (9,215 of 25,568 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.83 · 43.5% (11,116 of 25,568 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.80 · 42.2% (10,783 of 25,568 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.79 · 39.1% (9,993 of 25,568 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.77 · 32.3% (8,260 of 25,568 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.74 · 38.8% (9,908 of 25,568 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.72 · 34.7% (8,875 of 25,568 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.72 · 28.9% (7,382 of 25,568 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.66 · 25.7% (6,578 of 25,568 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.63 · 31.5% (8,066 of 25,568 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 0.63 · 20.5% (5,239 of 25,568 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.62 · 37.8% (9,676 of 25,568 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.60 · 20.8% (5,309 of 25,568 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.59 · 26.2% (6,711 of 25,568 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (4,377 of 25,568 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.55 · 21.6% (5,516 of 25,568 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.54 · 16.5% (4,207 of 25,568 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.54 · 36.4% (9,313 of 25,568 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.53 · 23.5% (6,004 of 25,568 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.52 · 15.9% (4,066 of 25,568 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.52 · 22.8% (5,839 of 25,568 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.52 · 19.4% (4,972 of 25,568 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.51 · 19.8% (5,073 of 25,568 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.51 · 33.7% (8,609 of 25,568 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.44 · 14.8% (3,785 of 25,568 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.43 · 15.7% (4,006 of 25,568 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.60 · 22.6% (5,790 of 25,568 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.50 · 18.2% (4,658 of 25,568 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.49 · 16.6% (4,238 of 25,568 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Exploration relevance 0.61 · 32.3% (8,255 of 25,568 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.56 · 20.1% (5,132 of 25,568 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 0.73 · 40.5% (10,343 of 25,568 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.58 · 31.7% (8,105 of 25,568 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.54 · 20.3% (5,191 of 25,568 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.52 · 30.8% (7,869 of 25,568 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Explore relevance 0.50 · 30.2% (7,730 of 25,568 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.48 · 26.7% (6,826 of 25,568 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.47 · 15.2% (3,877 of 25,568 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.45 · 35.5% (9,072 of 25,568 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.44 · 15.1% (3,855 of 25,568 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.44 · 34.4% (8,790 of 25,568 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.59 · 28.7% (7,329 of 25,568 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.57 · 34.7% (8,883 of 25,568 decks)
All lands (5)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.70 · 37.2% (9,499 of 25,568 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.68 · 33.7% (8,607 of 25,568 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.68 · 35.0% (8,957 of 25,568 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.47 · 17.2% (4,399 of 25,568 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.46 · 16.3% (4,159 of 25,568 decks)
EDH data for Avenger of Zendikar: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 25,568 real decks.