Color Identity Spread
7.4% Naya
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Yuma, Proud Protector relevance 3.89 · 75.0% (2,823 of 3,764 decks)
- Kirri, Talented Sprout relevance 3.45 · 76.0% (1,124 of 1,478 decks)
- Obuun, Mul Daya Ancestor relevance 2.34 · 35.1% (652 of 1,856 decks)
- Toph, the First Metalbender relevance 2.23 · 18.2% (5,003 of 27,504 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.22 · 26.0% (1,160 of 4,458 decks)
- Jetmir, Nexus of Revels relevance 1.75 · 17.8% (869 of 4,878 decks)
- Hazezon Tamar relevance 1.60 · 30.1% (114 of 379 decks)
- Baylen, the Haymaker relevance 1.10 · 7.7% (1,256 of 16,412 decks)
- Marath, Will of the Wild relevance 1.03 · 10.6% (221 of 2,078 decks)
- Mayael the Anima relevance 0.94 · 9.4% (197 of 2,092 decks)
- Jinnie Fay, Jetmir's Second relevance 0.92 · 8.5% (259 of 3,059 decks)
- Rith, the Awakener relevance 0.88 · 11.1% (86 of 777 decks)
- Phabine, Boss's Confidant relevance 0.68 · 8.8% (55 of 622 decks)
- Ghired, Conclave Exile relevance 0.57 · 5.6% (104 of 1,868 decks)
- Prava of the Steel Legion // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.54 · 13.9% (10 of 72 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.49 · 11.2% (11 of 98 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.45 · 4.0% (106 of 2,625 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (8 of 81 decks)
- Ghired, Mirror of the Wilds relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (102 of 2,973 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.37 · 2.9% (149 of 5,143 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.37 · 8.7% (8 of 92 decks)
- Gahiji, Honored One relevance 0.37 · 4.7% (29 of 622 decks)
- Atla Palani, Nest Tender relevance 0.34 · 2.3% (276 of 12,235 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The War Doctor relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (11 of 217 decks)
- Kitt Kanto, Mayhem Diva relevance 0.27 · 3.1% (32 of 1,045 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (117 of 5,703 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.25 · 6.1% (6 of 99 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.23 · 5.3% (6 of 114 decks)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Othelm, Sigardian Outcast relevance 0.21 · 7.3% (3 of 41 decks)
- Samut, the Driving Force relevance 0.20 · 2.0% (43 of 2,161 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.33 · 57.4% (8,746 of 15,225 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.33 · 44.5% (6,768 of 15,225 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.13 · 34.8% (5,298 of 15,225 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 33.9% (5,156 of 15,225 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.11 · 42.0% (6,400 of 15,225 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.10 · 34.2% (5,206 of 15,225 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.01 · 28.3% (4,302 of 15,225 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.00 · 32.6% (4,966 of 15,225 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 27.9% (4,246 of 15,225 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.91 · 34.8% (5,299 of 15,225 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.90 · 40.1% (6,109 of 15,225 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.88 · 34.3% (5,218 of 15,225 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.88 · 46.1% (7,019 of 15,225 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.88 · 33.4% (5,087 of 15,225 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 0.87 · 21.3% (3,249 of 15,225 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.85 · 24.1% (3,676 of 15,225 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.80 · 22.1% (3,366 of 15,225 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 0.79 · 18.7% (2,850 of 15,225 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.78 · 18.8% (2,866 of 15,225 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 0.78 · 17.9% (2,724 of 15,225 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.76 · 20.1% (3,053 of 15,225 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.74 · 27.1% (4,122 of 15,225 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 0.74 · 19.8% (3,021 of 15,225 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.73 · 34.2% (5,202 of 15,225 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.73 · 21.9% (3,327 of 15,225 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.73 · 29.3% (4,462 of 15,225 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.72 · 22.4% (3,416 of 15,225 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (2,571 of 15,225 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.70 · 24.5% (3,736 of 15,225 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.69 · 15.1% (2,302 of 15,225 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.33 · 57.4% (8,746 of 15,225 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.33 · 44.5% (6,768 of 15,225 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.13 · 34.8% (5,298 of 15,225 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 33.9% (5,156 of 15,225 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.10 · 34.2% (5,206 of 15,225 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.01 · 28.3% (4,302 of 15,225 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.00 · 32.6% (4,966 of 15,225 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.92 · 27.9% (4,246 of 15,225 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.90 · 40.1% (6,109 of 15,225 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.88 · 34.3% (5,218 of 15,225 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.88 · 33.4% (5,087 of 15,225 decks)
- Rumbleweed relevance 0.87 · 21.3% (3,249 of 15,225 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.80 · 22.1% (3,366 of 15,225 decks)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 0.79 · 18.7% (2,850 of 15,225 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.78 · 18.8% (2,866 of 15,225 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.74 · 27.1% (4,122 of 15,225 decks)
- Sand Scout relevance 0.74 · 19.8% (3,021 of 15,225 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.73 · 21.9% (3,327 of 15,225 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.72 · 22.4% (3,416 of 15,225 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.70 · 24.5% (3,736 of 15,225 decks)
- Turntimber Sower relevance 0.69 · 15.1% (2,302 of 15,225 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.66 · 19.7% (3,002 of 15,225 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.91 · 34.8% (5,299 of 15,225 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.73 · 34.2% (5,202 of 15,225 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.88 · 46.1% (7,019 of 15,225 decks)
- The Mending of Dominaria relevance 0.65 · 16.1% (2,455 of 15,225 decks)
- Desert Warfare relevance 0.65 · 17.4% (2,642 of 15,225 decks)
All instants (2)
- Harrow relevance 1.11 · 42.0% (6,400 of 15,225 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.73 · 29.3% (4,462 of 15,225 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.85 · 24.1% (3,676 of 15,225 decks)
- Vengeful Regrowth relevance 0.78 · 17.9% (2,724 of 15,225 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.76 · 20.1% (3,053 of 15,225 decks)
- Magmatic Insight relevance 0.71 · 16.9% (2,571 of 15,225 decks)
- Wreck and Rebuild relevance 0.67 · 15.0% (2,289 of 15,225 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.65 · 23.6% (3,592 of 15,225 decks)
All utility lands (12)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.95 · 27.6% (4,203 of 15,225 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.95 · 28.1% (4,278 of 15,225 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 0.94 · 27.8% (4,227 of 15,225 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 0.94 · 27.7% (4,212 of 15,225 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 0.94 · 27.5% (4,190 of 15,225 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 0.92 · 26.9% (4,097 of 15,225 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 0.92 · 26.7% (4,070 of 15,225 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 0.91 · 26.1% (3,972 of 15,225 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.89 · 28.1% (4,271 of 15,225 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.89 · 28.0% (4,268 of 15,225 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.89 · 25.4% (3,862 of 15,225 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 0.87 · 27.3% (4,163 of 15,225 decks)
All lands (3)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.85 · 24.2% (3,690 of 15,225 decks)
- Painted Bluffs relevance 0.80 · 21.7% (3,311 of 15,225 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.67 · 39.2% (5,963 of 15,225 decks)
EDH data for Avenger of Zendikar: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 15,225 real decks.