Cards like Nature's Lore
1.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 49% of other green decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. 29% of other green decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other green decks
Cards
- Nature's Lore 54%
- Three Visits 51%
- Skyshroud Claim 37%
- Nissa's Pilgrimage 14%
- Hunting Wilds 5%
- Glimpse the Core 3%
- Ranger's Path 2%
Other options: Field Trip
Cards like Cultivate
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. 64% of other green decks
68% of decks run two or more
vs. 47% of other green decks
2.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.6 in other green decks
Cards
- Cultivate 61%
- Kodama's Reach 56%
- Rampant Growth 49%
- Traverse the Outlands 18%
- Boundless Realms 10%
- Explosive Vegetation 9%
- Shared Roots 8%
- Migration Path 8%
- Reshape the Earth 8%
- Search for Tomorrow 4%
- Harvest Season 4%
- Map the Frontier 2%
- Primal Growth 2%
- Grow from the Ashes 2%
- Celebrate the Harvest 2%
- Reach the Horizon 1%
- Far Wanderings 1%
- They Went This Way 1%
- Untamed Wilds 1%
- Roamer's Routine 1%
- Path to the Festival 1%
- New Generation's Technique 1%
Other options: Terramorph, Beneath the Sands, Peregrination, Viewpoint Synchronization, Nissa's Expedition, Slimefoot's Survey, Deep Reconnaissance, Verdant Mastery, Map the Wastes
Cards like Ohran Frostfang
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 27% of other green decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other green decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.39 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 60% of other green decks
64% of decks run two or more
vs. 46% of other green decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 1.5 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 63%
- Elvish Mystic 55%
- Fyndhorn Elves 40%
- Llanowar Tribe 18%
- Boreal Druid 5%
- Druid of the Cowl 3%
- Fyndhorn Elder 2%
- Leaf Gilder 2%
- Greenweaver Druid 1%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Garruk's Uprising
2.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 41% of other green decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
0.90 per deck on average
vs. 0.53 in other green decks
Cards like Reclamation Sage
5.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Viridian Shaman, Uktabi Orangutan, Myconid Spore Tender, Conclave Naturalists, Indrik Stomphowler
Cards like Oracle of Mul Daya
3.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Soul of the Harvest
3.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Craterhoof Behemoth
4.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Thundering Ceratok, Earthshaker Giant
Cards like Nyxbloom Ancient
4.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
- Nyxbloom Ancient 33%
- Mana Reflection 18%
Cards like Nissa, Who Shakes the World
6.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Rishkar's Expertise
2.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma
3.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Malamet Brawler, Eel-Hounds, Fangren Pathcutter, Master Symmetrist
Cards like Exploration
3.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other green decks
Cards like Ulvenwald Hydra
2.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Asceticism
4.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Eternal Witness
1.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Wildwood Escort
Cards like Beast Whisperer
1.5× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other green decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Natural Order
7.2× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Circle of Dreams Druid
6.8× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
- Overwhelming Stampede 22%
- Overrun 5%
- Overcome 1%
- Full Steam Ahead 1%
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
1.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other green decks
Cards like Worldly Tutor
1.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other green decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 24%
- Sylvan Tutor 3%
Cards like Ghalta, Primal Hunger
2.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.39 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.23 · 40.2% (39 of 97 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.21 · 47.4% (46 of 97 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.20 · 51.5% (50 of 97 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.28 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.22 · 38.1% (37 of 97 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.29 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.22 · 33.0% (32 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.20 · 41.2% (40 of 97 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.27 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.23 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.24 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.19 · 44.3% (43 of 97 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.19 · 40.2% (39 of 97 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.19 · 37.1% (36 of 97 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.23 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.23 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.21 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.23 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.17 · 45.4% (44 of 97 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.22 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.21 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.18 · 39.2% (38 of 97 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.27 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.16 · 53.6% (52 of 97 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.18 · 40.2% (39 of 97 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.23 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.21 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.22 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.17 · 43.3% (42 of 97 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.23 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.25 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.19 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.21 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.24 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.26 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.18 · 35.1% (34 of 97 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.17 · 38.1% (37 of 97 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.18 · 32.0% (31 of 97 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.21 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.22 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.21 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.20 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.23 · 40.2% (39 of 97 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.21 · 47.4% (46 of 97 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.20 · 51.5% (50 of 97 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.28 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.22 · 38.1% (37 of 97 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 0.22 · 33.0% (32 of 97 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.23 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.24 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.19 · 44.3% (43 of 97 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.19 · 40.2% (39 of 97 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.19 · 37.1% (36 of 97 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.21 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.17 · 45.4% (44 of 97 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.22 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Bane of Progress relevance 0.21 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Sylvan Advocate relevance 0.27 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.16 · 53.6% (52 of 97 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.18 · 40.2% (39 of 97 decks)
- Nylea, Keen-Eyed relevance 0.23 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Vorinclex, Voice of Hunger relevance 0.21 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.22 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.17 · 43.3% (42 of 97 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.23 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.19 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.21 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.24 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.18 · 35.1% (34 of 97 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.17 · 38.1% (37 of 97 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.21 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 0.20 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.20 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Surrak and Goreclaw relevance 0.18 · 30.9% (30 of 97 decks)
- Kogla, the Titan Ape relevance 0.19 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.17 · 36.1% (35 of 97 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.18 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.16 · 40.2% (39 of 97 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.19 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.21 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.21 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.21 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.17 · 30.9% (30 of 97 decks)
- Regal Behemoth relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.20 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Apex Altisaur relevance 0.20 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Surrak, the Hunt Caller relevance 0.21 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.21 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Nylea, God of the Hunt relevance 0.22 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.19 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.19 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.17 · 27.8% (27 of 97 decks)
All artifacts (48)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.21 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.15 · 42.3% (41 of 97 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.20 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Chimil, the Inner Sun relevance 0.22 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Lumbering Worldwagon relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.18 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Staff of Titania relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.13 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.17 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.09 · 45.4% (44 of 97 decks)
- Rhonas's Monument relevance 0.13 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.14 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.11 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.10 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Nevinyrral's Disk relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.13 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.13 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.12 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Sledge-Class Seedship relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.11 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Vivien's Arkbow relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Strata Scythe relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Bootleggers' Stash relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Trinisphere relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 64.9% (63 of 97 decks)
- Nyx Lotus relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.09 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.08 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Earth Surge relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 0.23 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Zendikar Resurgent relevance 0.23 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.18 · 39.2% (38 of 97 decks)
- Court of Bounty relevance 0.26 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.18 · 32.0% (31 of 97 decks)
- Nature's Will relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Virtue of Strength // Garenbrig Growth relevance 0.22 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.15 · 47.4% (46 of 97 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.19 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.17 · 28.9% (28 of 97 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.16 · 30.9% (30 of 97 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.20 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.19 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Gaea's Touch relevance 0.20 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Birthing Ritual relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.15 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Up the Beanstalk relevance 0.18 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.16 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.18 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Khalni Heart Expedition relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.14 · 22.7% (22 of 97 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.15 · 15.5% (15 of 97 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.10 · 57.7% (56 of 97 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.18 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Glorious Sunrise relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.16 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.15 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.16 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Hall of Gemstone relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Wild Pair relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Lost in the Woods relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.16 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Lurking Predators relevance 0.16 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.14 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Vernal Bloom relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Perilous Forays relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.13 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.11 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.13 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.12 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Oath of Druids relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Druids' Repository relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.12 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
All instants (50)
- Kamahl's Will relevance 0.39 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.21 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.19 · 25.8% (25 of 97 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.17 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.16 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.11 · 48.5% (47 of 97 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.14 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Autumn's Veil relevance 0.18 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.13 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.13 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Blessed Respite relevance 0.17 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.09 · 63.9% (62 of 97 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.16 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.16 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.16 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.13 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.15 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.14 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.13 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.07 · 66.0% (64 of 97 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.13 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.11 · 15.5% (15 of 97 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.14 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.12 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.12 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.12 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Early Harvest relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Smuggler's Surprise relevance 0.13 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Strength of Cedars relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.12 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.11 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Dramatic Entrance relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.12 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Warping Wail relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Setessan Tactics relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.10 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Obscuring Haze relevance 0.11 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.09 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Back to Nature relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.29 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Kamahl's Druidic Vow relevance 0.30 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Rude Awakening relevance 0.29 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.27 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.23 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.25 · 10.3% (10 of 97 decks)
- Reshape the Earth relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.17 · 37.1% (36 of 97 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 0.19 · 24.7% (24 of 97 decks)
- Hunting Wilds relevance 0.25 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Regrowth relevance 0.20 · 15.5% (15 of 97 decks)
- Nissa's Pilgrimage relevance 0.20 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.19 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Seasons Past relevance 0.24 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Genesis Wave relevance 0.19 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.16 · 29.9% (29 of 97 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 50.5% (49 of 97 decks)
- Traverse the Outlands relevance 0.18 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.21 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.12 · 55.7% (54 of 97 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.19 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.15 · 26.8% (26 of 97 decks)
- Spinning Wheel Kick relevance 0.21 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 0.20 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.18 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.16 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.17 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.11 · 53.6% (52 of 97 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.12 · 40.2% (39 of 97 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.19 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Soul's Majesty relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.18 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.14 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.14 · 21.6% (21 of 97 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.10 · 49.5% (48 of 97 decks)
- Green Sun's Twilight relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.13 · 20.6% (20 of 97 decks)
- Nylea's Intervention relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Creeping Corrosion relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.12 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.09 · 60.8% (59 of 97 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Open the Way relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (18)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.20 · 41.2% (40 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.22 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Worldwaker relevance 0.25 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Garruk, Primal Hunter relevance 0.20 · 19.6% (19 of 97 decks)
- Vivien, Monsters' Advocate relevance 0.23 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Garruk Wildspeaker relevance 0.21 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Vivien Reid relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Garruk, Unleashed relevance 0.20 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Vivien on the Hunt relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Vastwood Seer // Nissa, Sage Animist relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Garruk, Caller of Beasts relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Wrenn and Seven relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Vivien, Champion of the Wilds relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Nissa, Genesis Mage relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Garruk, Curse Breaker relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (4)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.18 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Invasion of Ixalan // Belligerent Regisaur relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Invasion of Shandalar // Leyline Surge relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.23 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Kazandu Mammoth // Kazandu Valley relevance 0.24 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.22 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.21 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Okina, Temple to the Grandfathers relevance 0.21 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.19 · 11.3% (11 of 97 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.17 · 14.4% (14 of 97 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.13 · 42.3% (41 of 97 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Tangled Florahedron // Tangled Vale relevance 0.19 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.14 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.13 · 34.0% (33 of 97 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.16 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.14 · 18.6% (18 of 97 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Roiling Canopy relevance 0.18 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 30.9% (30 of 97 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.15 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.14 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.14 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.13 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.14 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Memorial to Unity relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.12 · 13.4% (13 of 97 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.14 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.14 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.10 · 16.5% (16 of 97 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.09 · 23.7% (23 of 97 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.12 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.12 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Crawling Barrens relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Fertile Thicket relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Yavimaya Hollow relevance 0.11 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Treetop Village relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- The Hunter Maze relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.10 · 3.1% (3 of 97 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.10 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
All lands (21)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.24 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Growing Rites of Itlimoc // Itlimoc, Cradle of the Sun relevance 0.17 · 22.7% (22 of 97 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.14 · 34.0% (33 of 97 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.19 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.14 · 30.9% (30 of 97 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.15 · 12.4% (12 of 97 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.15 · 4.1% (4 of 97 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.14 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.13 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.11 · 9.3% (9 of 97 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (6 of 97 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.12 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.12 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.11 · 8.2% (8 of 97 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.11 · 7.2% (7 of 97 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.11 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 5.2% (5 of 97 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.06 · 2.1% (2 of 97 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 91.8% (89 of 97 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kodama of the East Tree, from 97 real Commander partner decks.