Color Identity Spread
14.4% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (30)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.84 · 60.8% (5,715 of 9,397 decks)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 2.78 · 62.2% (4,414 of 7,095 decks)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 2.61 · 75.7% (1,340 of 1,771 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.15 · 44.2% (2,141 of 4,843 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 2.08 · 48.4% (1,220 of 2,522 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 2.07 · 50.6% (992 of 1,961 decks)
- Adrix and Nev, Twincasters relevance 1.97 · 38.7% (1,869 of 4,824 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.68 · 41.6% (488 of 1,174 decks)
- Volo, Guide to Monsters relevance 1.61 · 28.5% (1,573 of 5,521 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.40 · 34.3% (309 of 901 decks)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.38 · 31.4% (382 of 1,215 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 1.15 · 29.3% (173 of 590 decks)
- Zimone, Quandrix Prodigy relevance 1.15 · 32.8% (123 of 375 decks)
- Kellan, Inquisitive Prodigy // Tail the Suspect relevance 1.13 · 31.1% (130 of 418 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 1.11 · 34.1% (95 of 279 decks)
- Gandalf, Westward Voyager relevance 1.11 · 27.4% (176 of 643 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 1.08 · 22.8% (275 of 1,206 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 1.07 · 16.4% (1,035 of 6,305 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 1.02 · 23.6% (180 of 764 decks)
- Ezuri, Claw of Progress relevance 1.01 · 17.0% (602 of 3,533 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.95 · 18.0% (326 of 1,814 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 0.93 · 21.8% (145 of 664 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 0.92 · 20.2% (180 of 889 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.91 · 21.5% (135 of 628 decks)
- Gretchen Titchwillow relevance 0.87 · 18.2% (197 of 1,083 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.85 · 37.0% (27 of 73 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.83 · 13.7% (438 of 3,189 decks)
- Ignis Scientia relevance 0.80 · 28.6% (38 of 133 decks)
- Omega, Heartless Evolution relevance 0.75 · 17.4% (102 of 585 decks)
- Zimone, Mystery Unraveler relevance 0.70 · 9.8% (706 of 7,187 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.25 · 59.7% (17,426 of 29,208 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.19 · 62.2% (18,157 of 29,208 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.88 · 33.6% (9,828 of 29,208 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.82 · 38.3% (11,184 of 29,208 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.81 · 31.3% (9,146 of 29,208 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.79 · 34.6% (10,105 of 29,208 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.76 · 55.2% (16,133 of 29,208 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.73 · 32.3% (9,428 of 29,208 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.69 · 25.9% (7,570 of 29,208 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.66 · 23.8% (6,945 of 29,208 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.61 · 33.1% (9,668 of 29,208 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.59 · 30.6% (8,947 of 29,208 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.59 · 35.7% (10,413 of 29,208 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.59 · 22.5% (6,572 of 29,208 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.58 · 24.9% (7,273 of 29,208 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.58 · 22.0% (6,438 of 29,208 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.57 · 21.8% (6,379 of 29,208 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.57 · 37.5% (10,956 of 29,208 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.56 · 44.3% (12,930 of 29,208 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.56 · 18.8% (5,503 of 29,208 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.55 · 19.8% (5,788 of 29,208 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.55 · 24.1% (7,033 of 29,208 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.54 · 15.2% (4,437 of 29,208 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.54 · 22.7% (6,642 of 29,208 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.53 · 16.7% (4,884 of 29,208 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.51 · 29.2% (8,539 of 29,208 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.51 · 15.2% (4,446 of 29,208 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.50 · 22.5% (6,576 of 29,208 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.49 · 21.9% (6,405 of 29,208 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.49 · 25.7% (7,498 of 29,208 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.25 · 59.7% (17,426 of 29,208 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.19 · 62.2% (18,157 of 29,208 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.88 · 33.6% (9,828 of 29,208 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.82 · 38.3% (11,184 of 29,208 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.81 · 31.3% (9,146 of 29,208 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.79 · 34.6% (10,105 of 29,208 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.76 · 55.2% (16,133 of 29,208 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.73 · 32.3% (9,428 of 29,208 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.69 · 25.9% (7,570 of 29,208 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.66 · 23.8% (6,945 of 29,208 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.61 · 33.1% (9,668 of 29,208 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.59 · 30.6% (8,947 of 29,208 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.58 · 22.0% (6,438 of 29,208 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.56 · 18.8% (5,503 of 29,208 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.55 · 19.8% (5,788 of 29,208 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.55 · 24.1% (7,033 of 29,208 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.54 · 15.2% (4,437 of 29,208 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.54 · 22.7% (6,642 of 29,208 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.51 · 15.2% (4,446 of 29,208 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.49 · 25.7% (7,498 of 29,208 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.48 · 16.5% (4,817 of 29,208 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.48 · 13.0% (3,798 of 29,208 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.47 · 15.7% (4,589 of 29,208 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.47 · 14.6% (4,272 of 29,208 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.57 · 21.8% (6,379 of 29,208 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.49 · 21.9% (6,405 of 29,208 decks)
All instants (5)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.59 · 35.7% (10,413 of 29,208 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.58 · 24.9% (7,273 of 29,208 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.57 · 37.5% (10,956 of 29,208 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.50 · 22.5% (6,576 of 29,208 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.48 · 22.3% (6,522 of 29,208 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.59 · 22.5% (6,572 of 29,208 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.56 · 44.3% (12,930 of 29,208 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.53 · 16.7% (4,884 of 29,208 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.51 · 29.2% (8,539 of 29,208 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.48 · 13.1% (3,828 of 29,208 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.58 · 19.7% (5,752 of 29,208 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.54 · 31.3% (9,147 of 29,208 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 0.49 · 13.6% (3,982 of 29,208 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.48 · 25.6% (7,487 of 29,208 decks)
All lands (10)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.60 · 37.4% (10,925 of 29,208 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.56 · 17.9% (5,238 of 29,208 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.55 · 33.0% (9,641 of 29,208 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.53 · 17.9% (5,225 of 29,208 decks)
- Cloudpost relevance 0.53 · 15.1% (4,404 of 29,208 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.50 · 15.6% (4,548 of 29,208 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (4,499 of 29,208 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.50 · 14.1% (4,117 of 29,208 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (4,496 of 29,208 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 0.49 · 13.0% (3,811 of 29,208 decks)
EDH data for Avenger of Zendikar: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 29,208 real decks.