Color Identity Spread
33.7% Green
All commanders (2)
- Baru, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.56 · 1.3% (1 of 75 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.56 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- World Shaper relevance 1.41 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.40 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.39 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.38 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.30 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.27 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 1.26 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 1.26 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.24 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.24 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.20 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.19 · 52.9% (18 of 34 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.10 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.09 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.08 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 1.07 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.06 · 52.9% (18 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 1.03 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.01 · 55.9% (19 of 34 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.97 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.96 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.95 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.94 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.94 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.93 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.91 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Six relevance 0.89 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.87 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.87 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.86 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
All creatures (28)
- World Shaper relevance 1.41 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 1.30 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Titania, Nature's Force relevance 1.26 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.24 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.19 · 52.9% (18 of 34 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 1.08 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.06 · 52.9% (18 of 34 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.97 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.96 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.95 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.94 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.93 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Six relevance 0.89 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Famished Worldsire relevance 0.87 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.87 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.86 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.84 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.83 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.78 · 41.2% (14 of 34 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.78 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.77 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.76 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.72 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.72 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Ulvenwald Hydra relevance 0.70 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.67 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.67 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.67 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.39 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.38 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.24 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 1.10 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 1.26 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 1.07 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.94 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.91 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.83 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.69 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
All instants (4)
- Constant Mists relevance 1.27 · 38.2% (13 of 34 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.01 · 55.9% (19 of 34 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.86 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.80 · 47.1% (16 of 34 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.40 · 50.0% (17 of 34 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.20 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.09 · 35.3% (12 of 34 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.69 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
All planeswalkers (3)
- Nissa, Vital Force relevance 1.03 · 26.5% (9 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Ascended Animist relevance 0.75 · 23.5% (8 of 34 decks)
- Nissa, Who Shakes the World relevance 0.66 · 32.4% (11 of 34 decks)
All lands (1)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.86 · 29.4% (10 of 34 decks)
EDH data for Wood Elemental: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 34 real decks.