Color Identity Spread
All commanders (3)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.75 · 39.8% (3,552 of 8,933 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.17 · 3.2% (13 of 410 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.11 · 1.1% (106 of 9,872 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.70 · 82.6% (3,074 of 3,722 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.59 · 83.0% (3,088 of 3,722 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.53 · 79.5% (2,960 of 3,722 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.52 · 79.7% (2,967 of 3,722 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.51 · 76.1% (2,834 of 3,722 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.48 · 78.1% (2,908 of 3,722 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.46 · 63.3% (2,357 of 3,722 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.40 · 62.3% (2,318 of 3,722 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.39 · 68.5% (2,551 of 3,722 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.37 · 66.5% (2,475 of 3,722 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.33 · 57.6% (2,144 of 3,722 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.32 · 84.2% (3,135 of 3,722 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.31 · 64.6% (2,405 of 3,722 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.28 · 49.9% (1,856 of 3,722 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.27 · 75.3% (2,802 of 3,722 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.25 · 47.8% (1,779 of 3,722 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.24 · 49.5% (1,844 of 3,722 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.23 · 51.3% (1,910 of 3,722 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.22 · 55.4% (2,061 of 3,722 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.22 · 43.5% (1,619 of 3,722 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.21 · 60.4% (2,249 of 3,722 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.18 · 44.4% (1,654 of 3,722 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.18 · 52.3% (1,947 of 3,722 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.14 · 38.3% (1,427 of 3,722 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.14 · 46.4% (1,728 of 3,722 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.12 · 39.0% (1,452 of 3,722 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.10 · 40.8% (1,520 of 3,722 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.09 · 40.3% (1,500 of 3,722 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.07 · 38.9% (1,449 of 3,722 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.06 · 38.6% (1,438 of 3,722 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.70 · 82.6% (3,074 of 3,722 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.59 · 83.0% (3,088 of 3,722 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.53 · 79.5% (2,960 of 3,722 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.52 · 79.7% (2,967 of 3,722 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.51 · 76.1% (2,834 of 3,722 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.48 · 78.1% (2,908 of 3,722 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.46 · 63.3% (2,357 of 3,722 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.40 · 62.3% (2,318 of 3,722 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.39 · 68.5% (2,551 of 3,722 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.33 · 57.6% (2,144 of 3,722 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.32 · 84.2% (3,135 of 3,722 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.28 · 49.9% (1,856 of 3,722 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.27 · 75.3% (2,802 of 3,722 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.25 · 47.8% (1,779 of 3,722 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.23 · 51.3% (1,910 of 3,722 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.22 · 55.4% (2,061 of 3,722 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.22 · 43.5% (1,619 of 3,722 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.21 · 60.4% (2,249 of 3,722 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.18 · 44.4% (1,654 of 3,722 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.14 · 38.3% (1,427 of 3,722 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.14 · 46.4% (1,728 of 3,722 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 1.10 · 40.8% (1,520 of 3,722 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 1.05 · 35.7% (1,327 of 3,722 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.95 · 31.6% (1,176 of 3,722 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines relevance 0.94 · 31.8% (1,182 of 3,722 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.92 · 33.6% (1,249 of 3,722 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.89 · 29.2% (1,088 of 3,722 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.85 · 34.4% (1,282 of 3,722 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.84 · 28.1% (1,047 of 3,722 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.24 · 49.5% (1,844 of 3,722 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 1.09 · 40.3% (1,500 of 3,722 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.37 · 66.5% (2,475 of 3,722 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.31 · 64.6% (2,405 of 3,722 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.07 · 38.9% (1,449 of 3,722 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.06 · 38.6% (1,438 of 3,722 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.94 · 32.7% (1,216 of 3,722 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.79 · 28.1% (1,047 of 3,722 decks)
All instants (4)
- Harrow relevance 1.18 · 52.3% (1,947 of 3,722 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.96 · 54.1% (2,015 of 3,722 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.88 · 37.4% (1,392 of 3,722 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.85 · 29.4% (1,095 of 3,722 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.12 · 39.0% (1,452 of 3,722 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.00 · 35.3% (1,315 of 3,722 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.80 · 24.1% (897 of 3,722 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.76 · 45.9% (1,707 of 3,722 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.11 · 43.2% (1,608 of 3,722 decks)
All lands (4)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 1.11 · 55.2% (2,054 of 3,722 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 1.02 · 47.6% (1,772 of 3,722 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.94 · 43.1% (1,606 of 3,722 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.79 · 55.1% (2,051 of 3,722 decks)
EDH data for Ashaya, Soul of the Wild: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,722 real decks.