Ashaya, Soul of the Wild

Played in 3,489 Sultai decks

Ashaya, Soul of the Wild
$15.32 €16.28

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

18

Showing 1-10 of 18

Page size
All commanders (18)
  1. Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 2.32 · 9.1% (636 of 6,964 decks)
  2. Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 1.46 · 3.4% (906 of 26,756 decks)
  3. Zimone and Dina relevance 1.34 · 4.9% (162 of 3,334 decks)
  4. Homer, the Hermit relevance 1.27 · 4.2% (188 of 4,483 decks)
  5. Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 1.11 · 2.7% (366 of 13,409 decks)
  6. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.07 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
  7. Archelos, Lagoon Mystic relevance 0.81 · 3.0% (61 of 2,066 decks)
  8. Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 0.78 · 1.8% (218 of 11,818 decks)
  9. Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.73 · 1.7% (214 of 12,791 decks)
  10. Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 0.71 · 1.4% (378 of 26,667 decks)
  11. Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.70 · 2.7% (43 of 1,601 decks)
  12. Kadena, Slinking Sorcerer relevance 0.48 · 1.4% (53 of 3,712 decks)
  13. Sin, Spira's Punishment relevance 0.45 · 1.4% (46 of 3,335 decks)
  14. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.43 · 4.2% (5 of 120 decks)
  15. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (4 of 105 decks)
  16. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kamahl, Heart of Krosa relevance 0.24 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
  17. Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.19 · 1.7% (3 of 177 decks)
  18. Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.12 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Quirion Ranger
    1.26 34.3%
    $1.99 €1.86
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.02 40.7%
    $5.60 €6.37
  • Scute Swarm
    0.97 40.4%
    $9.06 €7.90
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.96 29.8%
    $12.51 €10.43
  • Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait
    0.91 37.6%
    $12.26 €14.05
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.89 35.9%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.87 34.8%
    $13.01 €9.08
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    0.81 41.4%
    $0.29 €0.14
  • Crop Rotation
    0.77 36.0%
    $3.86 €3.64
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    0.73 27.3%
    $9.84 €6.73
All most relevant (30)
  1. Quirion Ranger relevance 1.26 · 34.3% (1,195 of 3,489 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.02 · 40.7% (1,419 of 3,489 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 0.97 · 40.4% (1,411 of 3,489 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.96 · 29.8% (1,038 of 3,489 decks)
  5. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.91 · 37.6% (1,311 of 3,489 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.89 · 35.9% (1,251 of 3,489 decks)
  7. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.87 · 34.8% (1,213 of 3,489 decks)
  8. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.81 · 41.4% (1,444 of 3,489 decks)
  9. Crop Rotation relevance 0.77 · 36.0% (1,257 of 3,489 decks)
  10. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.73 · 27.3% (954 of 3,489 decks)
  11. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.70 · 20.8% (724 of 3,489 decks)
  12. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.69 · 16.6% (578 of 3,489 decks)
  13. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.66 · 30.3% (1,058 of 3,489 decks)
  14. Exploration relevance 0.66 · 27.3% (953 of 3,489 decks)
  15. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.65 · 23.1% (806 of 3,489 decks)
  16. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.63 · 20.8% (727 of 3,489 decks)
  17. Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.62 · 22.8% (797 of 3,489 decks)
  18. Scryb Ranger relevance 0.61 · 14.0% (490 of 3,489 decks)
  19. Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.61 · 25.4% (886 of 3,489 decks)
  20. Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.59 · 18.3% (639 of 3,489 decks)
  21. Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.57 · 26.2% (914 of 3,489 decks)
  22. Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.57 · 16.9% (590 of 3,489 decks)
  23. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.57 · 17.9% (623 of 3,489 decks)
  24. Finale of Devastation relevance 0.56 · 22.4% (782 of 3,489 decks)
  25. Badgermole Cub relevance 0.56 · 15.7% (547 of 3,489 decks)
  26. Mystic Remora relevance 0.56 · 28.1% (981 of 3,489 decks)
  27. Chord of Calling relevance 0.55 · 17.2% (601 of 3,489 decks)
  28. Priest of Titania relevance 0.55 · 24.5% (854 of 3,489 decks)
  29. Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.55 · 24.9% (868 of 3,489 decks)
  30. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.55 · 23.2% (810 of 3,489 decks)

Creatures

31

Showing 1-10 of 31

Page size
  • Quirion Ranger
    1.26 34.3%
    $1.99 €1.86
  • Lotus Cobra
    1.02 40.7%
    $5.60 €6.37
  • Scute Swarm
    0.97 40.4%
    $9.06 €7.90
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.96 29.8%
    $12.51 €10.43
  • Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait
    0.91 37.6%
    $12.26 €14.05
  • Tireless Provisioner
    0.89 35.9%
    $3.94 €3.03
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.87 34.8%
    $13.01 €9.08
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    0.81 41.4%
    $0.29 €0.14
  • Dryad of the Ilysian Grove
    0.73 27.3%
    $9.84 €6.73
  • Springheart Nantuko
    0.70 20.8%
    $6.18 €4.28
All creatures (31)
  1. Quirion Ranger relevance 1.26 · 34.3% (1,195 of 3,489 decks)
  2. Lotus Cobra relevance 1.02 · 40.7% (1,419 of 3,489 decks)
  3. Scute Swarm relevance 0.97 · 40.4% (1,411 of 3,489 decks)
  4. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.96 · 29.8% (1,038 of 3,489 decks)
  5. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.91 · 37.6% (1,311 of 3,489 decks)
  6. Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.89 · 35.9% (1,251 of 3,489 decks)
  7. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.87 · 34.8% (1,213 of 3,489 decks)
  8. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.81 · 41.4% (1,444 of 3,489 decks)
  9. Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.73 · 27.3% (954 of 3,489 decks)
  10. Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.70 · 20.8% (724 of 3,489 decks)
  11. Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.69 · 16.6% (578 of 3,489 decks)
  12. Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.66 · 30.3% (1,058 of 3,489 decks)
  13. Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.65 · 23.1% (806 of 3,489 decks)
  14. Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.63 · 20.8% (727 of 3,489 decks)
  15. Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.62 · 22.8% (797 of 3,489 decks)
  16. Scryb Ranger relevance 0.61 · 14.0% (490 of 3,489 decks)
  17. Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.61 · 25.4% (886 of 3,489 decks)
  18. Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.59 · 18.3% (639 of 3,489 decks)
  19. Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.57 · 26.2% (914 of 3,489 decks)
  20. Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.57 · 17.9% (623 of 3,489 decks)
  21. Badgermole Cub relevance 0.56 · 15.7% (547 of 3,489 decks)
  22. Priest of Titania relevance 0.55 · 24.5% (854 of 3,489 decks)
  23. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.55 · 23.2% (810 of 3,489 decks)
  24. Eternal Witness relevance 0.55 · 35.4% (1,236 of 3,489 decks)
  25. Formidable Speaker relevance 0.54 · 23.7% (828 of 3,489 decks)
  26. Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.54 · 17.3% (604 of 3,489 decks)
  27. Icetill Explorer relevance 0.54 · 30.6% (1,069 of 3,489 decks)
  28. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.54 · 21.9% (764 of 3,489 decks)
  29. Elvish Mystic relevance 0.54 · 30.3% (1,057 of 3,489 decks)
  30. Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.54 · 16.8% (587 of 3,489 decks)
  31. Llanowar Elves relevance 0.53 · 36.3% (1,265 of 3,489 decks)

Enchantments

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Exploration
    0.66 27.3%
    $30.00 €26.36
  • Retreat to Coralhelm
    0.57 16.9%
    $0.39 €0.65
  • Mystic Remora
    0.56 28.1%
    $15.41 €12.34
  • Rhystic Study
    0.55 31.0%
    $70.41 €44.67
All enchantments (4)
  1. Exploration relevance 0.66 · 27.3% (953 of 3,489 decks)
  2. Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.57 · 16.9% (590 of 3,489 decks)
  3. Mystic Remora relevance 0.56 · 28.1% (981 of 3,489 decks)
  4. Rhystic Study relevance 0.55 · 31.0% (1,082 of 3,489 decks)

Instants

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Crop Rotation
    0.77 36.0%
    $3.86 €3.64
  • Chord of Calling
    0.55 17.2%
    $8.26 €4.56
  • Vampiric Tutor
    0.55 24.9%
    $54.95 €41.58
All instants (3)
  1. Crop Rotation relevance 0.77 · 36.0% (1,257 of 3,489 decks)
  2. Chord of Calling relevance 0.55 · 17.2% (601 of 3,489 decks)
  3. Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.55 · 24.9% (868 of 3,489 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Finale of Devastation
    0.56 22.4%
    $35.33 €28.44
  • Demonic Tutor
    0.54 28.3%
    $66.51 €46.04
  • Scapeshift
    0.53 15.0%
    $41.94 €33.47
All sorceries (3)
  1. Finale of Devastation relevance 0.56 · 22.4% (782 of 3,489 decks)
  2. Demonic Tutor relevance 0.54 · 28.3% (986 of 3,489 decks)
  3. Scapeshift relevance 0.53 · 15.0% (523 of 3,489 decks)

Utility Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth
    0.64 38.0%
    $17.31 €12.76
  • Field of the Dead
    0.63 26.5%
    $27.75 €27.07
  • Boseiju, Who Endures
    0.58 36.3%
    $48.20 €39.84
  • Otawara, Soaring City
    0.55 29.0%
    $26.58 €23.54
All utility lands (4)
  1. Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.64 · 38.0% (1,327 of 3,489 decks)
  2. Field of the Dead relevance 0.63 · 26.5% (925 of 3,489 decks)
  3. Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.58 · 36.3% (1,265 of 3,489 decks)
  4. Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.55 · 29.0% (1,012 of 3,489 decks)

Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Simic Growth Chamber
    0.57 27.6%
    $0.37 €0.37
  • Windswept Heath
    0.54 22.8%
    $12.29 €10.69
  • Fabled Passage
    0.53 30.9%
    $0.53 €1.08
  • Wooded Foothills
    0.53 21.2%
    $17.82 €16.59
  • Gaea's Cradle
    0.53 17.6%
    $1627.48 €1064.44
All lands (5)
  1. Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.57 · 27.6% (963 of 3,489 decks)
  2. Windswept Heath relevance 0.54 · 22.8% (795 of 3,489 decks)
  3. Fabled Passage relevance 0.53 · 30.9% (1,077 of 3,489 decks)
  4. Wooded Foothills relevance 0.53 · 21.2% (740 of 3,489 decks)
  5. Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.53 · 17.6% (613 of 3,489 decks)

EDH data for Ashaya, Soul of the Wild: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,489 real decks.