Cards like Mystic Remora
6.3× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Sultai decks
47% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.29 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 58%
- Rhystic Study 51%
Cards like Deadly Rollick
6.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Sultai decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
11× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Sultai decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Demonic Consultation
14× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Demonic Consultation 43%
- Tainted Pact 40%
Cards like Chrome Mox
12× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 43%
- Mox Diamond 38%
Cards like Flusterstorm
13× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Sultai decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.91 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Flusterstorm 46%
- Mental Misstep 37%
- Dispel 6%
- Miscast 2%
Other options: Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills
Cards like Force of Will
9.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Sultai decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Force of Will 55%
- Force of Negation 38%
Cards like Sol Ring
8.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
85% of decks run one or more
vs. 77% of other Sultai decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.83 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Azusa, Lost but Seeking
5.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Sultai decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Sultai decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Misdirection
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Nature's Rhythm
3.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Sultai decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Sultai decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait
2.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Sultai decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Gandalf, Shadow's Foe
Cards like Swan Song
6.5× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Swan Song 50%
- Strix Serenade 6%
Cards like Icetill Explorer
1.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other Sultai decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Mystical Tutor
13× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession, Merchant Scroll
Cards like Lotus Petal
8.2× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Animate Dead
2.4× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Sultai decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Sultai decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Animate Dead 20%
- Necromancy 8%
- Dance of the Dead 2%
Cards like Gush
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Exploration
9.1× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
13× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Sultai decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Cards like Noxious Revival
Over 20× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Sultai decks
Cards like Worldly Tutor
8.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Worldly Tutor 39%
- Sylvan Tutor 4%
Cards like Brainstorm
13× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Sultai decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Brainstorm 32%
- Brainsurge 2%
Cards like Demonic Tutor
3.9× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Sultai decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Sultai decks
Cards
Other options: Razaketh's Rite, Rhystic Tutor, Diabolic Revelation, Demonic Collusion, Illicit Shipment, Demonic Bargain, Behold the Beyond
Cards like Reanimate
2.7× as likely as other Sultai decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other Sultai decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Sultai decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Sultai decks
Cards
- Reanimate 48%
- Life // Death 2%
All top picks (50)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.50 · 48.2% (119 of 247 decks)
- Gush relevance 0.52 · 35.6% (88 of 247 decks)
- Doomsday relevance 0.48 · 39.7% (98 of 247 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.44 · 46.2% (114 of 247 decks)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.37 · 58.3% (144 of 247 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.45 · 36.4% (90 of 247 decks)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.53 · 16.6% (41 of 247 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.48 · 25.1% (62 of 247 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.48 · 21.9% (54 of 247 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.44 · 29.1% (72 of 247 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.32 · 59.1% (146 of 247 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.40 · 35.2% (87 of 247 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.40 · 36.4% (90 of 247 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.43 · 28.7% (71 of 247 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.44 · 25.5% (63 of 247 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.52 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (39 of 247 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.37 · 38.1% (94 of 247 decks)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.49 · 12.1% (30 of 247 decks)
- Baleful Mastery relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.37 · 33.6% (83 of 247 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.39 · 25.9% (64 of 247 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.44 · 14.6% (36 of 247 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.42 · 19.0% (47 of 247 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Massacre relevance 0.51 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.35 · 34.4% (85 of 247 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.37 · 29.1% (72 of 247 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.41 · 19.8% (49 of 247 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.41 · 18.2% (45 of 247 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.32 · 43.3% (107 of 247 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.36 · 30.8% (76 of 247 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.26 · 59.5% (147 of 247 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.35 · 32.4% (80 of 247 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.40 · 17.8% (44 of 247 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.24 · 66.4% (164 of 247 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 0.49 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.25 · 59.9% (148 of 247 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.48 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.47 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.32 · 34.4% (85 of 247 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.36 · 22.7% (56 of 247 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.29 · 43.7% (108 of 247 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.32 · 33.2% (82 of 247 decks)
- Reverent Silence relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.33 · 29.6% (73 of 247 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Valley Floodcaller relevance 0.37 · 58.3% (144 of 247 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.44 · 25.5% (63 of 247 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.47 · 15.8% (39 of 247 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.51 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Wandering Archaic // Explore the Vastlands relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.37 · 29.1% (72 of 247 decks)
- Notion Thief relevance 0.41 · 19.8% (49 of 247 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.36 · 30.8% (76 of 247 decks)
- Eye of Duskmantle relevance 0.49 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Kitsa, Otterball Elite relevance 0.47 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.32 · 34.4% (85 of 247 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.36 · 22.7% (56 of 247 decks)
- Opposition Agent relevance 0.32 · 33.2% (82 of 247 decks)
- Poison Dart Frog relevance 0.45 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Doom Whisperer relevance 0.41 · 10.1% (25 of 247 decks)
- Mirko, Obsessive Theorist relevance 0.47 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.34 · 23.5% (58 of 247 decks)
- Samut, Tyrant of Naktamun relevance 0.44 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.29 · 38.9% (96 of 247 decks)
- Wan Shi Tong, Librarian relevance 0.32 · 29.1% (72 of 247 decks)
- The Cabbage Merchant relevance 0.35 · 19.4% (48 of 247 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.39 · 12.1% (30 of 247 decks)
- Grolnok, the Omnivore relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Savvy Trader relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.33 · 18.6% (46 of 247 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.28 · 34.8% (86 of 247 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.23 · 51.4% (127 of 247 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.32 · 17.4% (43 of 247 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.33 · 16.2% (40 of 247 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.22 · 52.6% (130 of 247 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 0.28 · 30.4% (75 of 247 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.34 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.42 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.30 · 14.2% (35 of 247 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.26 · 27.1% (67 of 247 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Witherbloom Apprentice relevance 0.36 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Dosan the Falling Leaf relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Lilysplash Mentor relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Metamorphosis Fanatic relevance 0.37 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.31 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.27 · 17.0% (42 of 247 decks)
- Protean Hulk relevance 0.34 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.21 · 42.5% (105 of 247 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.23 · 33.6% (83 of 247 decks)
All artifacts (39)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.44 · 46.2% (114 of 247 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.45 · 36.4% (90 of 247 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.48 · 21.9% (54 of 247 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.52 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.37 · 33.6% (83 of 247 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.35 · 15.8% (39 of 247 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.27 · 38.5% (95 of 247 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.27 · 36.4% (90 of 247 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.25 · 42.9% (106 of 247 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.39 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.26 · 36.4% (90 of 247 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.28 · 25.5% (63 of 247 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.28 · 27.5% (68 of 247 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.28 · 23.5% (58 of 247 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.21 · 51.4% (127 of 247 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.30 · 14.6% (36 of 247 decks)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.40 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Exploration Broodship relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.25 · 12.6% (31 of 247 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Hedge Shredder relevance 0.24 · 12.1% (30 of 247 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.23 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.25 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.18 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 71.7% (177 of 247 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.17 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.24 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.15 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 85.0% (210 of 247 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.13 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
All enchantments (36)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.50 · 48.2% (119 of 247 decks)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.53 · 16.6% (41 of 247 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.32 · 59.1% (146 of 247 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.32 · 43.3% (107 of 247 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.47 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Carpet of Flowers relevance 0.33 · 19.8% (49 of 247 decks)
- Fortune Teller's Talent relevance 0.45 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.39 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.38 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- One with the Multiverse relevance 0.43 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.24 · 27.5% (68 of 247 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.33 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.32 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.17 · 57.9% (143 of 247 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.25 · 20.2% (50 of 247 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 0.30 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.28 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.16 · 51.4% (127 of 247 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.26 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Mirri's Guile relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Retreat to Hagra relevance 0.27 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.32 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.26 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Ripples of Undeath relevance 0.17 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.16 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
All instants (50)
- Gush relevance 0.52 · 35.6% (88 of 247 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.48 · 25.1% (62 of 247 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.44 · 29.1% (72 of 247 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 0.40 · 35.2% (87 of 247 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.40 · 36.4% (90 of 247 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.43 · 28.7% (71 of 247 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.37 · 38.1% (94 of 247 decks)
- Banishing Knack relevance 0.49 · 12.1% (30 of 247 decks)
- Baleful Mastery relevance 0.49 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Submerge relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.44 · 14.6% (36 of 247 decks)
- Noxious Revival relevance 0.26 · 59.5% (147 of 247 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.35 · 32.4% (80 of 247 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.25 · 59.9% (148 of 247 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.48 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.29 · 43.7% (108 of 247 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.33 · 29.6% (73 of 247 decks)
- Drag to the Roots relevance 0.42 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.30 · 37.2% (92 of 247 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.40 · 11.7% (29 of 247 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.34 · 24.3% (60 of 247 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.25 · 51.0% (126 of 247 decks)
- Insidious Dreams relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.28 · 37.2% (92 of 247 decks)
- Price of Fame relevance 0.44 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.27 · 40.5% (100 of 247 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.23 · 55.1% (136 of 247 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.25 · 45.7% (113 of 247 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.26 · 43.3% (107 of 247 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.42 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.25 · 40.5% (100 of 247 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.25 · 38.5% (95 of 247 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.24 · 43.7% (108 of 247 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.19 · 62.3% (154 of 247 decks)
- Daze relevance 0.38 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.31 · 13.8% (34 of 247 decks)
- Pile On relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.23 · 38.9% (96 of 247 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.29 · 14.6% (36 of 247 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 0.36 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.23 · 34.0% (84 of 247 decks)
- Ad Nauseam relevance 0.31 · 9.7% (24 of 247 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.26 · 18.6% (46 of 247 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.32 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.19 · 50.2% (124 of 247 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.18 · 52.2% (129 of 247 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Doomsday relevance 0.48 · 39.7% (98 of 247 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.42 · 19.0% (47 of 247 decks)
- Massacre relevance 0.51 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.35 · 34.4% (85 of 247 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.41 · 18.2% (45 of 247 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.40 · 17.8% (44 of 247 decks)
- Culling Ritual relevance 0.24 · 66.4% (164 of 247 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.44 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Reverent Silence relevance 0.48 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Dark Petition relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.38 · 13.8% (34 of 247 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.36 · 16.2% (40 of 247 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.28 · 38.5% (95 of 247 decks)
- No One Left Behind relevance 0.45 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.39 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.37 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.39 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.39 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.37 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.36 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Demonic Counsel relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Chain of Smog relevance 0.35 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (17 of 247 decks)
- Tendrils of Agony relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.19 · 48.2% (119 of 247 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.26 · 17.8% (44 of 247 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.32 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.22 · 31.2% (77 of 247 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.28 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.33 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.21 · 27.1% (67 of 247 decks)
- Bring to Light relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.37 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.23 · 16.2% (40 of 247 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.16 · 54.7% (135 of 247 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Sylvan Tutor relevance 0.33 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Vicious Rivalry relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.34 · 3.2% (8 of 247 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Diresight relevance 0.34 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.39 · 25.9% (64 of 247 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.32 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 0.22 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.30 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.26 · 2.4% (6 of 247 decks)
- Oko, Thief of Crowns relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
- Ashiok, Dream Render relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Ikoria // Zilortha, Apex of Ikoria relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.42 · 12.1% (30 of 247 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.33 · 28.3% (70 of 247 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.36 · 15.4% (38 of 247 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.29 · 26.7% (66 of 247 decks)
- Horizon of Progress relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.28 · 28.3% (70 of 247 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.35 · 10.1% (25 of 247 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.30 · 19.8% (49 of 247 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.30 · 17.8% (44 of 247 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.30 · 17.0% (42 of 247 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.21 · 44.5% (110 of 247 decks)
- Lilypad Village relevance 0.43 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.23 · 32.8% (81 of 247 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.19 · 49.4% (122 of 247 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.25 · 17.4% (43 of 247 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.27 · 13.0% (32 of 247 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.28 · 11.3% (28 of 247 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.17 · 51.8% (128 of 247 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.28 · 8.9% (22 of 247 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.19 · 36.8% (91 of 247 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.24 · 13.4% (33 of 247 decks)
- Kishla Village relevance 0.29 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.19 · 31.2% (77 of 247 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.14 · 63.2% (156 of 247 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.28 · 5.3% (13 of 247 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.26 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.27 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.26 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.25 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.22 · 10.5% (26 of 247 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.24 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Dakmor Salvage relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.19 · 19.8% (49 of 247 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.18 · 25.5% (63 of 247 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.22 · 9.7% (24 of 247 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.29 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.24 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.19 · 12.1% (30 of 247 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.21 · 9.3% (23 of 247 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.21 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.25 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.21 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Zagoth Triome relevance 0.13 · 32.0% (79 of 247 decks)
- Volrath's Stronghold relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (7 of 247 decks)
All lands (50)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.26 · 40.1% (99 of 247 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.23 · 48.2% (119 of 247 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.24 · 44.1% (109 of 247 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.24 · 43.3% (107 of 247 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.22 · 50.2% (124 of 247 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.20 · 49.8% (123 of 247 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.21 · 47.8% (118 of 247 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.22 · 41.3% (102 of 247 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.20 · 49.0% (121 of 247 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.20 · 48.2% (119 of 247 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (21 of 247 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.20 · 49.4% (122 of 247 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.31 · 10.9% (27 of 247 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.21 · 41.7% (103 of 247 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.28 · 12.1% (30 of 247 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (15 of 247 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.20 · 36.4% (90 of 247 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.35 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.22 · 21.5% (53 of 247 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.30 · 4.5% (11 of 247 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (18 of 247 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.22 · 15.0% (37 of 247 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.23 · 12.6% (31 of 247 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.24 · 10.1% (25 of 247 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.22 · 13.4% (33 of 247 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.20 · 19.4% (48 of 247 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.21 · 14.2% (35 of 247 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.24 · 9.7% (24 of 247 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.24 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.24 · 8.1% (20 of 247 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.22 · 12.6% (31 of 247 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.21 · 15.4% (38 of 247 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.18 · 25.9% (64 of 247 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.24 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.22 · 10.1% (25 of 247 decks)
- Necroblossom Snarl relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Wastewood Verge relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (19 of 247 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.27 · 4.0% (10 of 247 decks)
- Echoing Deeps relevance 0.28 · 3.6% (9 of 247 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.17 · 26.3% (65 of 247 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.18 · 21.1% (52 of 247 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.23 · 5.7% (14 of 247 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (12 of 247 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.23 · 6.5% (16 of 247 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.17 · 23.5% (58 of 247 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Glarb, Calamity's Augur, from 247 real Commander decks.