Field of the Dead
Played in 3,666 Ink-Treader decks
Color Identity Spread
2.6% Ink-Treader
- Sultai 21,396 · 15.1%
- Jund 14,336 · 10.1%
- Golgari 12,201 · 8.6%
- Abzan 10,944 · 7.7%
- Naya 9,182 · 6.5%
- Simic 8,567 · 6.0%
- Five-Color 7,760 · 5.5%
- Green 7,754 · 5.5%
- Dimir 5,681 · 4.0%
- Esper 5,398 · 3.8%
- Gruul 5,020 · 3.5%
- Colorless 4,706 · 3.3%
- Temur 4,210 · 3.0%
- Ink-Treader 3,666 · 2.6%
- Black 3,204 · 2.3%
- Orzhov 3,070 · 2.2%
- Other (16) 14,921 · 10.5%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (14)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.43 · 30.7% (2,852 of 9,292 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.70 · 5.9% (618 of 10,418 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.40 · 13.2% (7 of 53 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Ryan Sinclair relevance 0.35 · 33.3% (2 of 6 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.33 · 5.5% (23 of 421 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (8 of 197 decks)
- Invisible Woman relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (23 of 1,011 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Susan Foreman relevance 0.11 · 3.2% (4 of 126 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.09 · 2.2% (5 of 224 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.06 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Rose Tyler relevance 0.05 · 3.3% (1 of 30 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Bjorna, Nightfall Alchemist relevance 0.05 · 1.5% (3 of 202 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.04 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Dan Lewis relevance 0.03 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.42 · 68.8% (2,523 of 3,666 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.41 · 73.6% (2,699 of 3,666 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.40 · 72.6% (2,662 of 3,666 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.38 · 67.4% (2,470 of 3,666 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.36 · 67.9% (2,489 of 3,666 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.35 · 70.7% (2,593 of 3,666 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.26 · 43.8% (1,605 of 3,666 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.26 · 74.3% (2,724 of 3,666 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.25 · 54.0% (1,979 of 3,666 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.25 · 55.3% (2,026 of 3,666 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.24 · 49.2% (1,805 of 3,666 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.23 · 63.3% (2,321 of 3,666 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.20 · 59.0% (2,163 of 3,666 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.19 · 75.9% (2,781 of 3,666 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.17 · 56.6% (2,075 of 3,666 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.15 · 45.3% (1,659 of 3,666 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.13 · 56.4% (2,066 of 3,666 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.09 · 36.3% (1,330 of 3,666 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.08 · 46.8% (1,714 of 3,666 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.07 · 60.5% (2,217 of 3,666 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.99 · 38.3% (1,405 of 3,666 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.98 · 35.5% (1,300 of 3,666 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.97 · 44.1% (1,618 of 3,666 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.96 · 34.2% (1,255 of 3,666 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.95 · 38.7% (1,419 of 3,666 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.95 · 34.3% (1,259 of 3,666 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.93 · 32.9% (1,206 of 3,666 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.92 · 30.4% (1,115 of 3,666 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.92 · 38.0% (1,392 of 3,666 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.89 · 32.9% (1,205 of 3,666 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.42 · 68.8% (2,523 of 3,666 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.41 · 73.6% (2,699 of 3,666 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.40 · 72.6% (2,662 of 3,666 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.36 · 67.9% (2,489 of 3,666 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.35 · 70.7% (2,593 of 3,666 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.26 · 74.3% (2,724 of 3,666 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.25 · 54.0% (1,979 of 3,666 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.25 · 55.3% (2,026 of 3,666 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.23 · 63.3% (2,321 of 3,666 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.20 · 59.0% (2,163 of 3,666 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.19 · 75.9% (2,781 of 3,666 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.15 · 45.3% (1,659 of 3,666 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.13 · 56.4% (2,066 of 3,666 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.09 · 36.3% (1,330 of 3,666 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.08 · 46.8% (1,714 of 3,666 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.99 · 38.3% (1,405 of 3,666 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.97 · 44.1% (1,618 of 3,666 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.96 · 34.2% (1,255 of 3,666 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.95 · 38.7% (1,419 of 3,666 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.95 · 34.3% (1,259 of 3,666 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.92 · 30.4% (1,115 of 3,666 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.92 · 38.0% (1,392 of 3,666 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines relevance 0.86 · 28.9% (1,061 of 3,666 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.86 · 32.6% (1,196 of 3,666 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.85 · 31.3% (1,148 of 3,666 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.82 · 26.7% (980 of 3,666 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.80 · 26.7% (980 of 3,666 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.77 · 29.0% (1,062 of 3,666 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.75 · 25.3% (927 of 3,666 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.24 · 49.2% (1,805 of 3,666 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.89 · 32.9% (1,205 of 3,666 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Exploration relevance 1.38 · 67.4% (2,470 of 3,666 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.17 · 56.6% (2,075 of 3,666 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.98 · 35.5% (1,300 of 3,666 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.82 · 29.8% (1,092 of 3,666 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.81 · 32.5% (1,190 of 3,666 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.07 · 60.5% (2,217 of 3,666 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.86 · 37.8% (1,387 of 3,666 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.81 · 40.6% (1,487 of 3,666 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Scapeshift relevance 1.26 · 43.8% (1,605 of 3,666 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.93 · 32.9% (1,206 of 3,666 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.81 · 23.2% (849 of 3,666 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.77 · 21.8% (799 of 3,666 decks)
All lands (7)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.92 · 45.8% (1,679 of 3,666 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.84 · 30.6% (1,120 of 3,666 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.81 · 37.7% (1,382 of 3,666 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.79 · 64.7% (2,372 of 3,666 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.78 · 22.4% (821 of 3,666 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.77 · 45.2% (1,656 of 3,666 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.75 · 34.3% (1,257 of 3,666 decks)
EDH data for Field of the Dead: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,666 real decks.