Field of the Dead
Played in 4,184 Temur decks
3030+23+3+6+1+4+7+6+
Color Identity Spread
3.0% Temur
-
Sultai 21,243 · 15.1%
-
Jund 14,270 · 10.1%
-
Golgari 12,125 · 8.6%
-
Abzan 10,868 · 7.7%
-
Naya 9,122 · 6.5%
-
Simic 8,510 · 6.0%
-
Five-Color 7,718 · 5.5%
-
Green 7,703 · 5.5%
-
Dimir 5,650 · 4.0%
-
Esper 5,361 · 3.8%
-
Gruul 4,983 · 3.5%
-
Colorless 4,674 · 3.3%
-
Temur 4,184 · 3.0%
-
Ink-Treader 3,644 · 2.6%
-
Black 3,179 · 2.3%
-
Orzhov 3,049 · 2.2%
- Other (16) 14,805 · 10.5%
Commanders
Flubs, the Fool 14.8% of decks
Flubs, the Fool 14.8% of decks
Omnath, Locus of the Roil 17.7% of decks
Omnath, Locus of the Roil 17.7% of decks
Averna, the Chaos Bloom 13.3% of decks
Averna, the Chaos Bloom 13.3% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 24.8% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith 24.8% of decks
Zagorka, Mother of Sanctum 17.1% of decks
Zagorka, Mother of Sanctum 17.1% of decks
Borborygmos and Fblthp 17.8% of decks
Borborygmos and Fblthp 17.8% of decks
Most Relevant
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 61.0% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 61.0% of decks
Lotus Cobra 61.8% of decks
Lotus Cobra 61.8% of decks
Scute Swarm 53.6% of decks
Scute Swarm 53.6% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 55.8% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 55.8% of decks
Exploration 58.9% of decks
Exploration 58.9% of decks
Oracle of Mul Daya 46.5% of decks
Oracle of Mul Daya 46.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.84 · 14.8% (1,788 of 12,074 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 2.41 · 17.7% (359 of 2,026 decks)
- Averna, the Chaos Bloom relevance 2.18 · 13.3% (411 of 3,091 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 2.18 · 24.8% (106 of 428 decks)
- Zagorka, Mother of Sanctum relevance 2.08 · 17.1% (173 of 1,010 decks)
- Borborygmos and Fblthp relevance 2.05 · 17.8% (149 of 839 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.49 · 16.9% (40 of 236 decks)
- Ureni, the Song Unending relevance 1.39 · 8.7% (109 of 1,255 decks)
- Loot, the Key to Everything relevance 1.11 · 5.8% (106 of 1,843 decks)
- Pako, Arcane Retriever // Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 1.07 · 4.5% (180 of 3,989 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.92 · 17.0% (9 of 53 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.73 · 8.1% (12 of 148 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.66 · 11.5% (6 of 52 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.63 · 2.4% (103 of 4,246 decks)
- Bill Potts // The Sixth Doctor relevance 0.60 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.59 · 6.6% (9 of 136 decks)
- Illuna, Apex of Wishes relevance 0.58 · 2.6% (57 of 2,195 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Tenth Doctor relevance 0.51 · 3.3% (20 of 612 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.43 · 4.6% (7 of 153 decks)
- Riku of Two Reflections relevance 0.41 · 1.7% (49 of 2,887 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (3 of 42 decks)
- Yasmin Khan // The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.36 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.26 · 5.7% (2 of 35 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.24 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Lara Croft, Tomb Raider relevance 0.24 · 1.2% (18 of 1,484 decks)
- Loot, the Pathfinder relevance 0.22 · 1.0% (25 of 2,474 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (2 of 53 decks)
- Donna Noble // The Sixth Doctor relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.17 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Graham O'Brien // The Twelfth Doctor relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.60 · 61.0% (2,551 of 4,184 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.59 · 61.8% (2,587 of 4,184 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.58 · 53.6% (2,244 of 4,184 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.55 · 55.8% (2,336 of 4,184 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.47 · 58.9% (2,463 of 4,184 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.39 · 46.5% (1,944 of 4,184 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.39 · 55.2% (2,311 of 4,184 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.27 · 35.4% (1,481 of 4,184 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.25 · 34.0% (1,424 of 4,184 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.24 · 37.5% (1,567 of 4,184 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.22 · 44.8% (1,876 of 4,184 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.20 · 36.7% (1,535 of 4,184 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.19 · 40.4% (1,690 of 4,184 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.14 · 33.5% (1,400 of 4,184 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.08 · 33.6% (1,404 of 4,184 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.06 · 35.9% (1,502 of 4,184 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 1.03 · 29.7% (1,244 of 4,184 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 1.02 · 38.0% (1,590 of 4,184 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.98 · 31.2% (1,305 of 4,184 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.96 · 21.2% (888 of 4,184 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.96 · 43.4% (1,817 of 4,184 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.96 · 27.3% (1,143 of 4,184 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.94 · 27.6% (1,153 of 4,184 decks)
- Six relevance 0.92 · 26.2% (1,098 of 4,184 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.90 · 27.2% (1,140 of 4,184 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.86 · 27.4% (1,148 of 4,184 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.85 · 24.3% (1,016 of 4,184 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.84 · 22.3% (934 of 4,184 decks)
- Eruth, Tormented Prophet relevance 0.83 · 26.0% (1,088 of 4,184 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.83 · 20.6% (861 of 4,184 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.60 · 61.0% (2,551 of 4,184 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.59 · 61.8% (2,587 of 4,184 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.58 · 53.6% (2,244 of 4,184 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.55 · 55.8% (2,336 of 4,184 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.39 · 46.5% (1,944 of 4,184 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.39 · 55.2% (2,311 of 4,184 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.27 · 35.4% (1,481 of 4,184 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.22 · 44.8% (1,876 of 4,184 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.20 · 36.7% (1,535 of 4,184 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.19 · 40.4% (1,690 of 4,184 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.14 · 33.5% (1,400 of 4,184 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.08 · 33.6% (1,404 of 4,184 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.06 · 35.9% (1,502 of 4,184 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.98 · 31.2% (1,305 of 4,184 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.94 · 27.6% (1,153 of 4,184 decks)
- Six relevance 0.92 · 26.2% (1,098 of 4,184 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.85 · 24.3% (1,016 of 4,184 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.84 · 22.3% (934 of 4,184 decks)
- Eruth, Tormented Prophet relevance 0.83 · 26.0% (1,088 of 4,184 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.81 · 23.5% (982 of 4,184 decks)
- Wayward Swordtooth relevance 0.81 · 26.0% (1,088 of 4,184 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.79 · 21.1% (883 of 4,184 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.79 · 23.6% (989 of 4,184 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.25 · 34.0% (1,424 of 4,184 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.96 · 27.3% (1,143 of 4,184 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.82 · 21.3% (890 of 4,184 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Exploration relevance 1.47 · 58.9% (2,463 of 4,184 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.24 · 37.5% (1,567 of 4,184 decks)
- Case of the Locked Hothouse relevance 1.03 · 29.7% (1,244 of 4,184 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 1.02 · 38.0% (1,590 of 4,184 decks)
- Abundance relevance 0.86 · 27.4% (1,148 of 4,184 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.81 · 21.8% (911 of 4,184 decks)
All instants (1)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.96 · 43.4% (1,817 of 4,184 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.96 · 21.2% (888 of 4,184 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 0.90 · 27.2% (1,140 of 4,184 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.83 · 20.6% (861 of 4,184 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.75 · 18.1% (759 of 4,184 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.95 · 48.0% (2,007 of 4,184 decks)
- Valakut, the Molten Pinnacle relevance 0.94 · 20.3% (849 of 4,184 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.89 · 19.9% (831 of 4,184 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.86 · 35.6% (1,490 of 4,184 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.80 · 18.9% (789 of 4,184 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.80 · 34.2% (1,432 of 4,184 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.77 · 29.7% (1,243 of 4,184 decks)
All lands (6)
- Snow-Covered Mountain relevance 0.89 · 22.7% (948 of 4,184 decks)
- Snow-Covered Forest relevance 0.88 · 23.8% (995 of 4,184 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.85 · 41.7% (1,745 of 4,184 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.81 · 22.5% (942 of 4,184 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.81 · 18.0% (753 of 4,184 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.75 · 61.7% (2,582 of 4,184 decks)
EDH data for Field of the Dead: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,184 real decks.






































































