Courser of Kruphix
Played in 2,297 Ink-Treader decks
Color Identity Spread
4.2% Ink-Treader
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (3)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.41 · 21.0% (1,937 of 9,229 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.54 · 3.1% (318 of 10,316 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.04 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.44 · 62.1% (1,427 of 2,297 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.44 · 74.3% (1,707 of 2,297 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.43 · 64.7% (1,487 of 2,297 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.43 · 73.9% (1,698 of 2,297 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.41 · 73.8% (1,696 of 2,297 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.40 · 68.9% (1,583 of 2,297 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.40 · 67.7% (1,556 of 2,297 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.38 · 72.0% (1,653 of 2,297 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.36 · 60.0% (1,378 of 2,297 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.36 · 65.7% (1,509 of 2,297 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.35 · 67.3% (1,546 of 2,297 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.32 · 84.1% (1,932 of 2,297 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.31 · 54.4% (1,249 of 2,297 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.26 · 48.9% (1,123 of 2,297 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.24 · 53.5% (1,229 of 2,297 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.20 · 60.0% (1,379 of 2,297 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.18 · 69.8% (1,603 of 2,297 decks)
- Harrow relevance 1.16 · 51.1% (1,174 of 2,297 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.13 · 39.2% (901 of 2,297 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.11 · 40.3% (925 of 2,297 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.07 · 40.9% (940 of 2,297 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.07 · 52.2% (1,199 of 2,297 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.06 · 37.6% (864 of 2,297 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.06 · 38.4% (883 of 2,297 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.06 · 41.8% (961 of 2,297 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.04 · 39.1% (899 of 2,297 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.03 · 41.0% (942 of 2,297 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.00 · 40.7% (935 of 2,297 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.99 · 36.4% (835 of 2,297 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.98 · 33.8% (776 of 2,297 decks)
All creatures (30)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.44 · 62.1% (1,427 of 2,297 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.44 · 74.3% (1,707 of 2,297 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.43 · 64.7% (1,487 of 2,297 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.43 · 73.9% (1,698 of 2,297 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.41 · 73.8% (1,696 of 2,297 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.40 · 68.9% (1,583 of 2,297 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.38 · 72.0% (1,653 of 2,297 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.36 · 60.0% (1,378 of 2,297 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.36 · 65.7% (1,509 of 2,297 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.35 · 67.3% (1,546 of 2,297 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.32 · 84.1% (1,932 of 2,297 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.31 · 54.4% (1,249 of 2,297 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.26 · 48.9% (1,123 of 2,297 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.24 · 53.5% (1,229 of 2,297 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.20 · 60.0% (1,379 of 2,297 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.18 · 69.8% (1,603 of 2,297 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 1.07 · 40.9% (940 of 2,297 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.06 · 41.8% (961 of 2,297 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 1.04 · 39.1% (899 of 2,297 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.00 · 40.7% (935 of 2,297 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.95 · 33.9% (779 of 2,297 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.94 · 34.5% (792 of 2,297 decks)
- Emeria Angel relevance 0.93 · 29.7% (682 of 2,297 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.93 · 33.4% (768 of 2,297 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.91 · 37.1% (852 of 2,297 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.90 · 30.4% (698 of 2,297 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 0.89 · 28.3% (650 of 2,297 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.84 · 27.4% (630 of 2,297 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.79 · 22.4% (514 of 2,297 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.77 · 27.8% (639 of 2,297 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.03 · 41.0% (942 of 2,297 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.99 · 36.4% (835 of 2,297 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.40 · 67.7% (1,556 of 2,297 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.13 · 39.2% (901 of 2,297 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 1.11 · 40.3% (925 of 2,297 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.07 · 52.2% (1,199 of 2,297 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.06 · 38.4% (883 of 2,297 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.80 · 23.7% (545 of 2,297 decks)
All instants (3)
- Harrow relevance 1.16 · 51.1% (1,174 of 2,297 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.98 · 33.8% (776 of 2,297 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.79 · 44.8% (1,029 of 2,297 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.06 · 37.6% (864 of 2,297 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.90 · 38.4% (883 of 2,297 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.90 · 53.7% (1,234 of 2,297 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.81 · 28.3% (649 of 2,297 decks)
All lands (5)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 1.04 · 51.9% (1,192 of 2,297 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 1.03 · 47.8% (1,099 of 2,297 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 1.00 · 45.5% (1,044 of 2,297 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.78 · 33.2% (763 of 2,297 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.77 · 29.3% (672 of 2,297 decks)
EDH data for Courser of Kruphix: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,297 real decks.