130+29+2+5+2+4+1+7+
Color Identity Spread
2.7% Ink-Treader
Commanders
Most Relevant
Ancient Greenwarden 66.5% of decks
Ancient Greenwarden 66.5% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 70.8% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 70.8% of decks
Lotus Cobra 68.6% of decks
Lotus Cobra 68.6% of decks
Omnath, Locus of Rage 66.5% of decks
Omnath, Locus of Rage 66.5% of decks
Scute Swarm 65.9% of decks
Scute Swarm 65.9% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 70.3% of decks
Dryad of the Ilysian Grove 70.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 1.57 · 1.6% (151 of 9,325 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.37 · 66.5% (123 of 185 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.36 · 70.8% (131 of 185 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.33 · 68.6% (127 of 185 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.29 · 66.5% (123 of 185 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.26 · 65.9% (122 of 185 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.19 · 70.3% (130 of 185 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.16 · 56.8% (105 of 185 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.14 · 50.3% (93 of 185 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.12 · 56.2% (104 of 185 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.11 · 70.3% (130 of 185 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.08 · 44.9% (83 of 185 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.05 · 41.6% (77 of 185 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.00 · 48.6% (90 of 185 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.98 · 38.9% (72 of 185 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.95 · 43.2% (80 of 185 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.95 · 47.6% (88 of 185 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.94 · 40.5% (75 of 185 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.91 · 44.3% (82 of 185 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.91 · 35.1% (65 of 185 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.89 · 39.5% (73 of 185 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.88 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.86 · 28.6% (53 of 185 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.85 · 24.9% (46 of 185 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.85 · 28.6% (53 of 185 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.84 · 27.6% (51 of 185 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.84 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.84 · 34.1% (63 of 185 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.84 · 30.8% (57 of 185 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.84 · 30.3% (56 of 185 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.84 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.37 · 66.5% (123 of 185 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.36 · 70.8% (131 of 185 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.33 · 68.6% (127 of 185 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.29 · 66.5% (123 of 185 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.26 · 65.9% (122 of 185 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.19 · 70.3% (130 of 185 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.16 · 56.8% (105 of 185 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.14 · 50.3% (93 of 185 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.12 · 56.2% (104 of 185 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.11 · 70.3% (130 of 185 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 1.08 · 44.9% (83 of 185 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.05 · 41.6% (77 of 185 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.95 · 43.2% (80 of 185 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.95 · 47.6% (88 of 185 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 0.94 · 40.5% (75 of 185 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 0.91 · 35.1% (65 of 185 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.86 · 28.6% (53 of 185 decks)
- Greensleeves, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.85 · 24.9% (46 of 185 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.85 · 28.6% (53 of 185 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.84 · 27.6% (51 of 185 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.84 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.84 · 34.1% (63 of 185 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.84 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Courser of Kruphix relevance 0.82 · 27.0% (50 of 185 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 0.76 · 20.0% (37 of 185 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.76 · 25.4% (47 of 185 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.76 · 27.0% (50 of 185 decks)
- Tunneling Geopede relevance 0.75 · 20.5% (38 of 185 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.72 · 26.5% (49 of 185 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.98 · 38.9% (72 of 185 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.84 · 30.8% (57 of 185 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.00 · 48.6% (90 of 185 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.91 · 44.3% (82 of 185 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.88 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.84 · 30.3% (56 of 185 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 0.75 · 27.0% (50 of 185 decks)
All instants (2)
- Harrow relevance 0.89 · 39.5% (73 of 185 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.82 · 46.5% (86 of 185 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.83 · 29.2% (54 of 185 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.76 · 45.4% (84 of 185 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.74 · 22.2% (41 of 185 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.71 · 24.9% (46 of 185 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.82 · 31.9% (59 of 185 decks)
All lands (7)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.96 · 44.9% (83 of 185 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.90 · 41.1% (76 of 185 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.89 · 44.3% (82 of 185 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.79 · 29.7% (55 of 185 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.76 · 53.5% (99 of 185 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.72 · 30.3% (56 of 185 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.70 · 29.7% (55 of 185 decks)
EDH data for Rootpath Purifier: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 185 real decks.





































