Color Identity Spread
All commanders (7)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.38 · 1.1% (51 of 4,757 decks)
- Thranduil the Strategist relevance 1.23 · 1.6% (19 of 1,225 decks)
- Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 0.86 · 1.1% (10 of 883 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.74 · 1.1% (7 of 624 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- The Third Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.28 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.21 · 53.4% (237 of 444 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.14 · 44.1% (196 of 444 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.10 · 39.6% (176 of 444 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.08 · 47.1% (209 of 444 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 1.06 · 34.0% (151 of 444 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.06 · 40.3% (179 of 444 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.03 · 54.1% (240 of 444 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.02 · 45.3% (201 of 444 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.99 · 37.2% (165 of 444 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.95 · 42.6% (189 of 444 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.94 · 34.5% (153 of 444 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.93 · 33.8% (150 of 444 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.91 · 42.3% (188 of 444 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.85 · 24.5% (109 of 444 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.85 · 36.3% (161 of 444 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.84 · 20.3% (90 of 444 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.80 · 20.7% (92 of 444 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.79 · 38.5% (171 of 444 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.77 · 55.6% (247 of 444 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.76 · 39.9% (177 of 444 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.76 · 24.1% (107 of 444 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.73 · 27.9% (124 of 444 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.73 · 14.0% (62 of 444 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.71 · 23.4% (104 of 444 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.71 · 22.5% (100 of 444 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.68 · 21.8% (97 of 444 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.67 · 32.0% (142 of 444 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.66 · 17.6% (78 of 444 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.66 · 21.8% (97 of 444 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.65 · 17.1% (76 of 444 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.21 · 53.4% (237 of 444 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.14 · 44.1% (196 of 444 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.10 · 39.6% (176 of 444 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.08 · 47.1% (209 of 444 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.06 · 40.3% (179 of 444 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.03 · 54.1% (240 of 444 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.99 · 37.2% (165 of 444 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.94 · 34.5% (153 of 444 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.91 · 42.3% (188 of 444 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.79 · 38.5% (171 of 444 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.77 · 55.6% (247 of 444 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.76 · 39.9% (177 of 444 decks)
- Tiller Engine relevance 0.73 · 14.0% (62 of 444 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.71 · 23.4% (104 of 444 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.71 · 22.5% (100 of 444 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.68 · 21.8% (97 of 444 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.67 · 32.0% (142 of 444 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.66 · 17.6% (78 of 444 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.66 · 21.8% (97 of 444 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 0.64 · 16.9% (75 of 444 decks)
- Cultivator Colossus relevance 0.64 · 19.1% (85 of 444 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.62 · 14.6% (65 of 444 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.60 · 14.0% (62 of 444 decks)
- Augur of Autumn relevance 0.59 · 18.0% (80 of 444 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.85 · 24.5% (109 of 444 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.84 · 20.3% (90 of 444 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.61 · 18.7% (83 of 444 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Spelunking relevance 1.06 · 34.0% (151 of 444 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.02 · 45.3% (201 of 444 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.93 · 33.8% (150 of 444 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.73 · 27.9% (124 of 444 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.95 · 42.6% (189 of 444 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.85 · 36.3% (161 of 444 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.64 · 24.3% (108 of 444 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.80 · 20.7% (92 of 444 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.76 · 24.1% (107 of 444 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.65 · 17.1% (76 of 444 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.61 · 19.6% (87 of 444 decks)
All utility lands (7)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.95 · 29.1% (129 of 444 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.84 · 25.5% (113 of 444 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.83 · 47.7% (212 of 444 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.82 · 27.9% (124 of 444 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.67 · 23.6% (105 of 444 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.67 · 17.8% (79 of 444 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.61 · 16.4% (73 of 444 decks)
All lands (5)
- Vesuva relevance 0.83 · 26.6% (118 of 444 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.74 · 46.4% (206 of 444 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.73 · 45.3% (201 of 444 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.67 · 22.5% (100 of 444 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.67 · 40.3% (179 of 444 decks)
EDH data for Rootpath Purifier: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 444 real decks.