Steward of the Harvest
Played in 188 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Green
-
Sultai 7,579 · 84.6%
-
Abzan 279 · 3.1%
-
Golgari 234 · 2.6%
-
Green 188 · 2.1%
- Other (13) 674 · 7.5%
1030+18+4+4+2+2+12+8+
That's every commander.
All commanders (10)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.62 · 1.5% (20 of 1,299 decks)
- Harold and Bob, First Numens relevance 1.61 · 7.7% (6 of 78 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 1.21 · 1.5% (9 of 604 decks)
- Mutagen Man, Living Ooze relevance 1.12 · 1.4% (8 of 588 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 1.08 · 1.4% (7 of 486 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.75 · 3.5% (2 of 57 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 0.67 · 1.1% (3 of 261 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.65 · 1.1% (3 of 281 decks)
- Mister Immortal relevance 0.39 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.35 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.14 · 33.5% (63 of 188 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.90 · 39.9% (75 of 188 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.89 · 32.4% (61 of 188 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.89 · 31.4% (59 of 188 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.79 · 20.7% (39 of 188 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.78 · 30.9% (58 of 188 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.77 · 45.2% (85 of 188 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.77 · 33.0% (62 of 188 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.76 · 38.3% (72 of 188 decks)
- Six relevance 0.75 · 27.1% (51 of 188 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.75 · 33.0% (62 of 188 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.74 · 26.6% (50 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.74 · 25.0% (47 of 188 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.72 · 27.1% (51 of 188 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.70 · 25.0% (47 of 188 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.70 · 29.3% (55 of 188 decks)
- Floral Evoker relevance 0.70 · 13.3% (25 of 188 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.69 · 36.2% (68 of 188 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.69 · 38.3% (72 of 188 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.66 · 22.3% (42 of 188 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.66 · 26.6% (50 of 188 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.65 · 34.0% (64 of 188 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.63 · 29.8% (56 of 188 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 33.5% (63 of 188 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.62 · 30.3% (57 of 188 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (35 of 188 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.60 · 31.4% (59 of 188 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.59 · 18.1% (34 of 188 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.59 · 22.3% (42 of 188 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (28 of 188 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.90 · 39.9% (75 of 188 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.89 · 31.4% (59 of 188 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.79 · 20.7% (39 of 188 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.78 · 30.9% (58 of 188 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.77 · 33.0% (62 of 188 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.76 · 38.3% (72 of 188 decks)
- Six relevance 0.75 · 27.1% (51 of 188 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.75 · 33.0% (62 of 188 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.74 · 25.0% (47 of 188 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.72 · 27.1% (51 of 188 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.70 · 29.3% (55 of 188 decks)
- Floral Evoker relevance 0.70 · 13.3% (25 of 188 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.69 · 36.2% (68 of 188 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.66 · 26.6% (50 of 188 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.65 · 34.0% (64 of 188 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.62 · 30.3% (57 of 188 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.61 · 18.6% (35 of 188 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.60 · 31.4% (59 of 188 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.89 · 32.4% (61 of 188 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.66 · 22.3% (42 of 188 decks)
- Amulet of Vigor relevance 0.59 · 18.1% (34 of 188 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.59 · 22.3% (42 of 188 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Spelunking relevance 0.74 · 26.6% (50 of 188 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.63 · 29.8% (56 of 188 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 33.5% (63 of 188 decks)
- Walk-In Closet // Forgotten Cellar relevance 0.58 · 14.9% (28 of 188 decks)
All instants (2)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.77 · 45.2% (85 of 188 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.69 · 38.3% (72 of 188 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Life from the Loam relevance 1.14 · 33.5% (63 of 188 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.70 · 25.0% (47 of 188 decks)
All utility lands (12)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.92 · 46.3% (87 of 188 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.91 · 33.0% (62 of 188 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.84 · 24.5% (46 of 188 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.80 · 29.3% (55 of 188 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.70 · 46.8% (88 of 188 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.66 · 20.2% (38 of 188 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.66 · 20.2% (38 of 188 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.65 · 19.7% (37 of 188 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.65 · 37.8% (71 of 188 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.64 · 16.0% (30 of 188 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.61 · 17.0% (32 of 188 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.58 · 42.6% (80 of 188 decks)
All lands (8)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.88 · 30.3% (57 of 188 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.79 · 24.5% (46 of 188 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.74 · 32.4% (61 of 188 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.73 · 30.9% (58 of 188 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.72 · 37.2% (70 of 188 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.67 · 28.7% (54 of 188 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.65 · 27.1% (51 of 188 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.64 · 16.5% (31 of 188 decks)
EDH data for Steward of the Harvest: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 188 real decks.




























































