Birchlore Rangers

Played in 6,107 decks

Birchlore Rangers
$0.74 €0.77

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 3.42 · 31.3% (184 of 588 decks)
  2. Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 3.40 · 22.5% (299 of 1,327 decks)
  3. Voja, Jaws of the Conclave relevance 3.06 · 2.0% (190 of 9,443 decks)
  4. Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.88 · 11.0% (459 of 4,156 decks)
  5. Rhys the Redeemed relevance 2.87 · 4.4% (129 of 2,953 decks)
  6. Momir Vig, Simic Visionary relevance 2.81 · 5.1% (54 of 1,060 decks)
  7. Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 2.76 · 5.4% (1,070 of 19,882 decks)
  8. Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.52 · 9.6% (292 of 3,053 decks)
  9. Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 2.44 · 11.2% (175 of 1,559 decks)
  10. Galadriel, Light of Valinor relevance 2.43 · 1.3% (138 of 10,224 decks)
  11. High Perfect Morcant relevance 2.38 · 4.2% (858 of 20,652 decks)
  12. Emmara, Soul of the Accord relevance 2.34 · 2.8% (99 of 3,587 decks)
  13. Abomination of Llanowar relevance 2.07 · 7.7% (92 of 1,193 decks)
  14. Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 2.01 · 1.5% (396 of 26,874 decks)
  15. Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 2.00 · 8.7% (107 of 1,236 decks)
  16. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 1.97 · 27.3% (9 of 33 decks)
  17. Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 1.96 · 1.8% (214 of 12,041 decks)
  18. Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 1.95 · 2.2% (34 of 1,548 decks)
  19. Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.81 · 13.9% (11 of 79 decks)
  20. Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 1.77 · 10.7% (45 of 421 decks)
  21. Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 1.76 · 7.2% (51 of 705 decks)
  22. Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 1.55 · 6.0% (10 of 168 decks)
  23. Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 1.54 · 12.8% (16 of 125 decks)
  24. Lonis, Cryptozoologist relevance 1.48 · 1.2% (28 of 2,372 decks)
  25. Kaysa relevance 1.47 · 16.7% (14 of 84 decks)
  26. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.46 · 30.4% (7 of 23 decks)
  27. Thranduil the Strategist relevance 1.42 · 1.5% (18 of 1,179 decks)
  28. Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.42 · 35.3% (6 of 17 decks)
  29. Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 1.38 · 1.3% (20 of 1,561 decks)
  30. Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 1.35 · 3.7% (2 of 54 decks)

Parallel Cards

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
All parallel cards (2)
  1. Heritage Druid
  2. Supportive Parents

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Heritage Druid
    3.48 59.6%
    $3.63 €2.98
  • Priest of Titania
    3.29 84.1%
    $1.85 €0.93
  • Elvish Archdruid
    3.19 79.7%
    $7.52 €4.66
  • Leaf-Crowned Visionary
    2.67 57.1%
    $4.36 €5.28
  • Wirewood Symbiote
    2.66 50.6%
    $0.27 €0.24
  • Quirion Ranger
    2.64 53.6%
    $2.11 €1.77
  • Marwyn, the Nurturer
    2.51 57.9%
    $5.65 €5.74
  • Elvish Warmaster
    2.48 55.2%
    $3.95 €3.93
  • Fyndhorn Elves
    2.41 77.0%
    $2.09 €3.30
  • Ezuri, Renegade Leader
    2.36 48.0%
    $24.00 €14.60
All most relevant (30)
  1. Heritage Druid relevance 3.48 · 59.6% (3,642 of 6,107 decks)
  2. Priest of Titania relevance 3.29 · 84.1% (5,135 of 6,107 decks)
  3. Elvish Archdruid relevance 3.19 · 79.7% (4,867 of 6,107 decks)
  4. Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 2.67 · 57.1% (3,485 of 6,107 decks)
  5. Wirewood Symbiote relevance 2.66 · 50.6% (3,091 of 6,107 decks)
  6. Quirion Ranger relevance 2.64 · 53.6% (3,276 of 6,107 decks)
  7. Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.51 · 57.9% (3,538 of 6,107 decks)
  8. Elvish Warmaster relevance 2.48 · 55.2% (3,372 of 6,107 decks)
  9. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 2.41 · 77.0% (4,701 of 6,107 decks)
  10. Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.36 · 48.0% (2,930 of 6,107 decks)
  11. Arbor Elf relevance 2.30 · 59.7% (3,643 of 6,107 decks)
  12. Imperious Perfect relevance 2.26 · 51.9% (3,167 of 6,107 decks)
  13. Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 2.23 · 52.3% (3,192 of 6,107 decks)
  14. Elvish Mystic relevance 2.20 · 85.4% (5,214 of 6,107 decks)
  15. Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.19 · 45.1% (2,754 of 6,107 decks)
  16. Beast Whisperer relevance 2.16 · 67.8% (4,143 of 6,107 decks)
  17. Wirewood Channeler relevance 2.15 · 40.0% (2,445 of 6,107 decks)
  18. Elvish Harbinger relevance 2.11 · 41.5% (2,536 of 6,107 decks)
  19. Llanowar Elves relevance 2.05 · 89.1% (5,441 of 6,107 decks)
  20. Elvish Visionary relevance 1.99 · 39.8% (2,428 of 6,107 decks)
  21. Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.93 · 34.4% (2,100 of 6,107 decks)
  22. Reclamation Sage relevance 1.92 · 54.9% (3,350 of 6,107 decks)
  23. Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.74 · 35.3% (2,157 of 6,107 decks)
  24. Boreal Druid relevance 1.72 · 34.3% (2,092 of 6,107 decks)
  25. Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.69 · 34.3% (2,097 of 6,107 decks)
  26. Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.62 · 33.6% (2,055 of 6,107 decks)
  27. Elvish Champion relevance 1.61 · 30.6% (1,871 of 6,107 decks)
  28. Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.59 · 28.0% (1,711 of 6,107 decks)
  29. Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.58 · 34.3% (2,095 of 6,107 decks)
  30. Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.54 · 27.2% (1,663 of 6,107 decks)

Creatures

43

Showing 1-10 of 43

Page size
  • Heritage Druid
    3.48 59.6%
    $3.63 €2.98
  • Priest of Titania
    3.29 84.1%
    $1.85 €0.93
  • Elvish Archdruid
    3.19 79.7%
    $7.52 €4.66
  • Leaf-Crowned Visionary
    2.67 57.1%
    $4.36 €5.28
  • Wirewood Symbiote
    2.66 50.6%
    $0.27 €0.24
  • Quirion Ranger
    2.64 53.6%
    $2.11 €1.77
  • Marwyn, the Nurturer
    2.51 57.9%
    $5.65 €5.74
  • Elvish Warmaster
    2.48 55.2%
    $3.95 €3.93
  • Fyndhorn Elves
    2.41 77.0%
    $2.09 €3.30
  • Ezuri, Renegade Leader
    2.36 48.0%
    $24.00 €14.60
All creatures (43)
  1. Heritage Druid relevance 3.48 · 59.6% (3,642 of 6,107 decks)
  2. Priest of Titania relevance 3.29 · 84.1% (5,135 of 6,107 decks)
  3. Elvish Archdruid relevance 3.19 · 79.7% (4,867 of 6,107 decks)
  4. Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 2.67 · 57.1% (3,485 of 6,107 decks)
  5. Wirewood Symbiote relevance 2.66 · 50.6% (3,091 of 6,107 decks)
  6. Quirion Ranger relevance 2.64 · 53.6% (3,276 of 6,107 decks)
  7. Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 2.51 · 57.9% (3,538 of 6,107 decks)
  8. Elvish Warmaster relevance 2.48 · 55.2% (3,372 of 6,107 decks)
  9. Fyndhorn Elves relevance 2.41 · 77.0% (4,701 of 6,107 decks)
  10. Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 2.36 · 48.0% (2,930 of 6,107 decks)
  11. Arbor Elf relevance 2.30 · 59.7% (3,643 of 6,107 decks)
  12. Imperious Perfect relevance 2.26 · 51.9% (3,167 of 6,107 decks)
  13. Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 2.23 · 52.3% (3,192 of 6,107 decks)
  14. Elvish Mystic relevance 2.20 · 85.4% (5,214 of 6,107 decks)
  15. Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 2.19 · 45.1% (2,754 of 6,107 decks)
  16. Beast Whisperer relevance 2.16 · 67.8% (4,143 of 6,107 decks)
  17. Wirewood Channeler relevance 2.15 · 40.0% (2,445 of 6,107 decks)
  18. Elvish Harbinger relevance 2.11 · 41.5% (2,536 of 6,107 decks)
  19. Llanowar Elves relevance 2.05 · 89.1% (5,441 of 6,107 decks)
  20. Elvish Visionary relevance 1.99 · 39.8% (2,428 of 6,107 decks)
  21. Joraga Treespeaker relevance 1.93 · 34.4% (2,100 of 6,107 decks)
  22. Reclamation Sage relevance 1.92 · 54.9% (3,350 of 6,107 decks)
  23. Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.74 · 35.3% (2,157 of 6,107 decks)
  24. Boreal Druid relevance 1.72 · 34.3% (2,092 of 6,107 decks)
  25. Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.69 · 34.3% (2,097 of 6,107 decks)
  26. Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.62 · 33.6% (2,055 of 6,107 decks)
  27. Elvish Champion relevance 1.61 · 30.6% (1,871 of 6,107 decks)
  28. Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.59 · 28.0% (1,711 of 6,107 decks)
  29. Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.58 · 34.3% (2,095 of 6,107 decks)
  30. Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.54 · 27.2% (1,663 of 6,107 decks)
  31. Copperhorn Scout relevance 1.44 · 24.3% (1,481 of 6,107 decks)
  32. Realmwalker relevance 1.43 · 37.8% (2,308 of 6,107 decks)
  33. Selfless Safewright relevance 1.40 · 28.7% (1,755 of 6,107 decks)
  34. Fauna Shaman relevance 1.40 · 31.1% (1,901 of 6,107 decks)
  35. Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 1.32 · 33.7% (2,058 of 6,107 decks)
  36. Devoted Druid relevance 1.32 · 33.1% (2,023 of 6,107 decks)
  37. Wellwisher relevance 1.27 · 21.6% (1,318 of 6,107 decks)
  38. Galadhrim Brigade relevance 1.27 · 23.1% (1,411 of 6,107 decks)
  39. Dwynen's Elite relevance 1.27 · 22.3% (1,364 of 6,107 decks)
  40. Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 1.25 · 37.9% (2,316 of 6,107 decks)
  41. Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.24 · 22.6% (1,380 of 6,107 decks)
  42. Formidable Speaker relevance 1.19 · 30.9% (1,888 of 6,107 decks)
  43. Canopy Tactician relevance 1.16 · 21.5% (1,312 of 6,107 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Staff of Domination
    1.22 28.9%
    $11.52 €10.09
All artifacts (1)
  1. Staff of Domination relevance 1.22 · 28.9% (1,767 of 6,107 decks)

Enchantments

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Elvish Guidance
    1.43 23.4%
    $0.87 €0.60
All enchantments (1)
  1. Elvish Guidance relevance 1.43 · 23.4% (1,430 of 6,107 decks)

Instants

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Elven Ambush
    1.43 28.0%
    $6.54 €7.41
All instants (1)
  1. Elven Ambush relevance 1.43 · 28.0% (1,712 of 6,107 decks)

Sorceries

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Elvish Promenade
    1.51 29.2%
    $8.89 €5.22
  • Glimpse of Nature
    1.20 19.5%
    $8.88 €4.79
All sorceries (2)
  1. Elvish Promenade relevance 1.51 · 29.2% (1,781 of 6,107 decks)
  2. Glimpse of Nature relevance 1.20 · 19.5% (1,189 of 6,107 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Wirewood Lodge
    2.38 47.9%
    $12.46 €7.61
All utility lands (1)
  1. Wirewood Lodge relevance 2.38 · 47.9% (2,923 of 6,107 decks)

Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Gilt-Leaf Palace
    1.15 20.6%
    $9.03 €4.95
All lands (1)
  1. Gilt-Leaf Palace relevance 1.15 · 20.6% (1,258 of 6,107 decks)

EDH data for Birchlore Rangers: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 6,107 real decks.