Living Lands
Played in 49 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
3.1% Jund
All commanders (1)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.57 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Life and Limb relevance 2.02 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Natural Affinity relevance 1.35 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.95 · 49.0% (24 of 49 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.95 · 55.1% (27 of 49 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.89 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.77 · 46.9% (23 of 49 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.72 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.69 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.66 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.65 · 40.8% (20 of 49 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.65 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.63 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.62 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.61 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.61 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.61 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.59 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.59 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.58 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.57 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.55 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.55 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.55 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.54 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.53 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.52 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.51 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.77 · 46.9% (23 of 49 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.72 · 34.7% (17 of 49 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.66 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.65 · 40.8% (20 of 49 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.61 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.61 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 0.59 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.57 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.55 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.55 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.54 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.53 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.52 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Scouring Swarm relevance 0.49 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.48 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Sylvan Safekeeper relevance 0.47 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Blood Artist relevance 0.46 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.45 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.45 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.65 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 0.62 · 30.6% (15 of 49 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.58 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Life and Limb relevance 2.02 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.69 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Squandered Resources relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Dictate of Erebos relevance 0.50 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
All instants (9)
- Natural Affinity relevance 1.35 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.95 · 49.0% (24 of 49 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.61 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.56 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.55 · 38.8% (19 of 49 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.48 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Abrupt Decay relevance 0.46 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Roiling Regrowth relevance 0.45 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Veil of Summer relevance 0.45 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.95 · 55.1% (27 of 49 decks)
- Sylvan Awakening relevance 0.89 · 16.3% (8 of 49 decks)
- Life from the Loam relevance 0.63 · 26.5% (13 of 49 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.59 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.51 · 32.7% (16 of 49 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 1.49 · 83.7% (41 of 49 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.95 · 49.0% (24 of 49 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.65 · 24.5% (12 of 49 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.45 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
All lands (5)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.53 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.50 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.50 · 18.4% (9 of 49 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.50 · 22.4% (11 of 49 decks)
- Badlands relevance 0.46 · 20.4% (10 of 49 decks)
EDH data for Living Lands: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 49 real decks.