Living Lands
Played in 63 Abzan decks
130+18+3+7+6+8+6+2+
Color Identity Spread
3.8% Abzan
Commanders
Most Relevant
Nature's Revolt 41.3% of decks
Nature's Revolt 41.3% of decks
Life and Limb 47.6% of decks
Life and Limb 47.6% of decks
Living Plane 33.3% of decks
Living Plane 33.3% of decks
Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite 44.4% of decks
Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite 44.4% of decks
Ethereal Absolution 17.5% of decks
Ethereal Absolution 17.5% of decks
Yedora, Grave Gardener 20.6% of decks
Yedora, Grave Gardener 20.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.48 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 2.70 · 41.3% (26 of 63 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 2.66 · 47.6% (30 of 63 decks)
- Living Plane relevance 2.15 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 1.47 · 44.4% (28 of 63 decks)
- Ethereal Absolution relevance 1.02 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.02 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Linvala, Keeper of Silence relevance 1.00 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.94 · 39.7% (25 of 63 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.93 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Drana and Linvala relevance 0.91 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.90 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.88 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 0.81 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.78 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.77 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.77 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.75 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.74 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.71 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Maha, Its Feathers Night relevance 0.71 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.70 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.70 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.70 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.69 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.69 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.66 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.65 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.65 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.64 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Elesh Norn, Grand Cenobite relevance 1.47 · 44.4% (28 of 63 decks)
- Yedora, Grave Gardener relevance 1.02 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Linvala, Keeper of Silence relevance 1.00 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Drana and Linvala relevance 0.91 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.88 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 0.81 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Elvish Reclaimer relevance 0.78 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- The Gitrog Monster relevance 0.74 · 30.2% (19 of 63 decks)
- Maha, Its Feathers Night relevance 0.71 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.70 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.65 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.64 · 27.0% (17 of 63 decks)
- Weathered Wayfarer relevance 0.63 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Moon-Blessed Cleric relevance 0.61 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.60 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.60 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.59 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.55 · 20.6% (13 of 63 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.95 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.90 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.77 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Nature's Revolt relevance 2.70 · 41.3% (26 of 63 decks)
- Life and Limb relevance 2.66 · 47.6% (30 of 63 decks)
- Living Plane relevance 2.15 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Ethereal Absolution relevance 1.02 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.93 · 33.3% (21 of 63 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.70 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
- Sterling Grove relevance 0.60 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
All instants (6)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.94 · 39.7% (25 of 63 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.75 · 28.6% (18 of 63 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.69 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.61 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Constant Mists relevance 0.58 · 14.3% (9 of 63 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.55 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.77 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.71 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.70 · 31.7% (20 of 63 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.69 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.66 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.65 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Armageddon relevance 0.61 · 12.7% (8 of 63 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.56 · 19.0% (12 of 63 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 1.23 · 65.1% (41 of 63 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 1.22 · 77.8% (49 of 63 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.83 · 25.4% (16 of 63 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.79 · 23.8% (15 of 63 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.71 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.59 · 22.2% (14 of 63 decks)
All lands (2)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.62 · 17.5% (11 of 63 decks)
- Flagstones of Trokair relevance 0.57 · 15.9% (10 of 63 decks)
EDH data for Living Lands: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 63 real decks.















































