830+31+2+6+3+3+1+4+
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Ink-Treader
Commanders
Omnath, Locus of Creation 22.0% of decks
Omnath, Locus of Creation 22.0% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Akiri, Line-Slinger 15.9% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Akiri, Line-Slinger 15.9% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 6.6% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 6.6% of decks
Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis 2.0% of decks
Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis 2.0% of decks
The Fourteenth Doctor // Donna Noble 2.7% of decks
The Fourteenth Doctor // Donna Noble 2.7% of decks
The Fourteenth Doctor // Susan Foreman 1.6% of decks
The Fourteenth Doctor // Susan Foreman 1.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Lotus Cobra 76.5% of decks
Lotus Cobra 76.5% of decks
Scute Swarm 74.1% of decks
Scute Swarm 74.1% of decks
Ancient Greenwarden 64.1% of decks
Ancient Greenwarden 64.1% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 68.4% of decks
Azusa, Lost but Seeking 68.4% of decks
Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait 65.4% of decks
Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait 65.4% of decks
Tireless Provisioner 62.9% of decks
Tireless Provisioner 62.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (8)
- Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 2.42 · 22.0% (2,058 of 9,353 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Akiri, Line-Slinger relevance 1.25 · 15.9% (104 of 655 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.53 · 6.6% (28 of 423 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.33 · 2.0% (207 of 10,491 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Donna Noble relevance 0.06 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Susan Foreman relevance 0.06 · 1.6% (2 of 128 decks)
- The Fourteenth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.05 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.03 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.48 · 76.5% (1,888 of 2,468 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.41 · 74.1% (1,830 of 2,468 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.32 · 64.1% (1,582 of 2,468 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.31 · 68.4% (1,688 of 2,468 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.31 · 65.4% (1,613 of 2,468 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.26 · 62.9% (1,552 of 2,468 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.25 · 64.5% (1,593 of 2,468 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.22 · 59.0% (1,455 of 2,468 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.21 · 48.9% (1,208 of 2,468 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.20 · 76.3% (1,882 of 2,468 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.17 · 57.6% (1,421 of 2,468 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.13 · 49.7% (1,226 of 2,468 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.13 · 55.0% (1,358 of 2,468 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.12 · 44.1% (1,088 of 2,468 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.12 · 48.0% (1,184 of 2,468 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.11 · 65.6% (1,618 of 2,468 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.10 · 36.6% (904 of 2,468 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.08 · 46.6% (1,151 of 2,468 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.06 · 41.2% (1,018 of 2,468 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.04 · 37.0% (914 of 2,468 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.03 · 46.8% (1,155 of 2,468 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.03 · 37.2% (919 of 2,468 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.03 · 40.7% (1,004 of 2,468 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.01 · 36.5% (901 of 2,468 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.99 · 56.0% (1,382 of 2,468 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.99 · 36.3% (896 of 2,468 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.98 · 32.7% (806 of 2,468 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.97 · 36.4% (898 of 2,468 decks)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.94 · 32.9% (813 of 2,468 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.92 · 33.8% (834 of 2,468 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 1.48 · 76.5% (1,888 of 2,468 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 1.41 · 74.1% (1,830 of 2,468 decks)
- Ancient Greenwarden relevance 1.32 · 64.1% (1,582 of 2,468 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.31 · 68.4% (1,688 of 2,468 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.31 · 65.4% (1,613 of 2,468 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 1.26 · 62.9% (1,552 of 2,468 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.25 · 64.5% (1,593 of 2,468 decks)
- Tannuk, Memorial Ensign relevance 1.21 · 48.9% (1,208 of 2,468 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.20 · 76.3% (1,882 of 2,468 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 1.17 · 57.6% (1,421 of 2,468 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.13 · 49.7% (1,226 of 2,468 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 1.12 · 44.1% (1,088 of 2,468 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 1.12 · 48.0% (1,184 of 2,468 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 1.11 · 65.6% (1,618 of 2,468 decks)
- Nissa, Resurgent Animist relevance 1.10 · 36.6% (904 of 2,468 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.08 · 46.6% (1,151 of 2,468 decks)
- Moraug, Fury of Akoum relevance 1.06 · 41.2% (1,018 of 2,468 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.04 · 37.0% (914 of 2,468 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 1.03 · 46.8% (1,155 of 2,468 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 1.01 · 36.5% (901 of 2,468 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.99 · 36.3% (896 of 2,468 decks)
- Traveling Chocobo relevance 0.98 · 32.7% (806 of 2,468 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.97 · 36.4% (898 of 2,468 decks)
- Mina and Denn, Wildborn relevance 0.88 · 36.4% (899 of 2,468 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.86 · 33.0% (814 of 2,468 decks)
- Elesh Norn, Mother of Machines relevance 0.86 · 28.8% (712 of 2,468 decks)
- Roil Elemental relevance 0.78 · 26.2% (646 of 2,468 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.77 · 27.9% (689 of 2,468 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 0.72 · 23.6% (582 of 2,468 decks)
- Sabotender relevance 0.71 · 22.3% (550 of 2,468 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.67 · 27.2% (672 of 2,468 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.03 · 40.7% (1,004 of 2,468 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.92 · 33.8% (834 of 2,468 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 1.22 · 59.0% (1,455 of 2,468 decks)
- Exploration relevance 1.13 · 55.0% (1,358 of 2,468 decks)
- Valakut Exploration relevance 1.03 · 37.2% (919 of 2,468 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.90 · 32.4% (800 of 2,468 decks)
- Spelunking relevance 0.82 · 29.1% (719 of 2,468 decks)
- Dragonback Assault relevance 0.71 · 23.6% (583 of 2,468 decks)
All instants (3)
- Crop Rotation relevance 0.99 · 56.0% (1,382 of 2,468 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.89 · 39.4% (973 of 2,468 decks)
- Entish Restoration relevance 0.74 · 31.5% (777 of 2,468 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Scapeshift relevance 0.94 · 32.9% (813 of 2,468 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 0.77 · 23.1% (569 of 2,468 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.76 · 26.9% (663 of 2,468 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Field of the Dead relevance 1.03 · 39.9% (985 of 2,468 decks)
All lands (4)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 1.00 · 49.4% (1,218 of 2,468 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.91 · 42.5% (1,048 of 2,468 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.81 · 37.0% (914 of 2,468 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.73 · 51.4% (1,269 of 2,468 decks)
EDH data for Springheart Nantuko: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,468 real decks.







































