Jokulhaups
Played in 107 Temur decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Zagorka, Mother of Sanctum relevance 1.38 · 1.1% (11 of 1,032 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.94 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
- Sunder relevance 0.93 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.91 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.87 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.80 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.79 · 31.8% (34 of 107 decks)
- Pathbreaker Ibex relevance 0.78 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.76 · 28.0% (30 of 107 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.75 · 17.8% (19 of 107 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.72 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.70 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
- Price of Glory relevance 0.70 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.69 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.69 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.67 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.66 · 17.8% (19 of 107 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.66 · 21.5% (23 of 107 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.63 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.62 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.61 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.60 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Volcanic Offering relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.59 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.59 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.58 · 17.8% (19 of 107 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.57 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.56 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.56 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Blood Moon relevance 0.55 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Pathbreaker Ibex relevance 0.78 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 0.72 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.70 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.66 · 17.8% (19 of 107 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.66 · 21.5% (23 of 107 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.63 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.59 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.58 · 17.8% (19 of 107 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.57 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.52 · 17.8% (19 of 107 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.52 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.52 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Lumra, Bellow of the Woods relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.51 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Shaman of Forgotten Ways relevance 0.51 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.48 · 13.1% (14 of 107 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.48 · 15.0% (16 of 107 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.47 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
All artifacts (7)
- Scroll Rack relevance 0.94 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.69 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 0.69 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.61 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.60 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.59 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.53 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.76 · 28.0% (30 of 107 decks)
- Price of Glory relevance 0.70 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.63 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Blood Moon relevance 0.55 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Food Chain relevance 0.54 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
All instants (6)
- Sunder relevance 0.93 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.75 · 17.8% (19 of 107 decks)
- Volcanic Offering relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.56 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.54 · 25.2% (27 of 107 decks)
- Spelljack relevance 0.49 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Time Warp relevance 0.91 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.87 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 0.80 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.79 · 31.8% (34 of 107 decks)
- Walk the Aeons relevance 0.67 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.56 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Genesis Ultimatum relevance 0.55 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 0.53 · 13.1% (14 of 107 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.51 · 40.2% (43 of 107 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.50 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.48 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.62 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.75 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
EDH data for Jokulhaups: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 107 real decks.