Capture of Jingzhou

Played in 15,576 decks

Capture of Jingzhou
$7.81 €6.70

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Narset, Enlightened Master relevance 4.66 · 26.5% (773 of 2,920 decks)
  2. Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 3.56 · 19.6% (305 of 1,556 decks)
  3. Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 3.00 · 31.5% (291 of 924 decks)
  4. Pako, Arcane Retriever // Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 2.99 · 9.4% (360 of 3,835 decks)
  5. Emet-Selch, Unsundered // Hades, Sorcerer of Eld relevance 2.93 · 8.3% (199 of 2,387 decks)
  6. Taigam, Ojutai Master relevance 2.92 · 16.0% (118 of 737 decks)
  7. Myra the Magnificent relevance 2.49 · 11.3% (234 of 2,073 decks)
  8. Tetsuo, Imperial Champion relevance 2.43 · 5.2% (75 of 1,445 decks)
  9. Kang Prime relevance 2.30 · 11.9% (40 of 336 decks)
  10. God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 2.29 · 30.4% (79 of 260 decks)
  11. Quandrix, the Proof relevance 2.28 · 5.3% (326 of 6,159 decks)
  12. Yennett, Cryptic Sovereign relevance 2.21 · 3.1% (141 of 4,526 decks)
  13. Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 2.20 · 5.3% (216 of 4,065 decks)
  14. Storm, Force of Nature relevance 2.14 · 4.6% (258 of 5,641 decks)
  15. Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 2.10 · 9.2% (681 of 7,398 decks)
  16. Medomai the Ageless relevance 2.04 · 12.6% (35 of 277 decks)
  17. Nine-Fingers Keene relevance 1.98 · 1.9% (52 of 2,741 decks)
  18. Ultimecia, Time Sorceress // Ultimecia, Omnipotent relevance 1.87 · 7.0% (35 of 500 decks)
  19. Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 1.79 · 3.3% (194 of 5,902 decks)
  20. Zaffai and the Tempests relevance 1.72 · 8.7% (63 of 722 decks)
  21. Gandalf, Party Guest relevance 1.68 · 3.2% (155 of 4,849 decks)
  22. Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 1.68 · 13.1% (83 of 634 decks)
  23. Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 1.65 · 12.5% (85 of 680 decks)
  24. Elminster relevance 1.65 · 3.5% (112 of 3,204 decks)
  25. Scarlet Witch, Chaotic Avenger relevance 1.65 · 7.6% (68 of 893 decks)
  26. Jin Sakai, Ghost of Tsushima relevance 1.64 · 1.4% (193 of 14,129 decks)
  27. Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 1.61 · 1.1% (58 of 5,494 decks)
  28. Jin-Gitaxias, Progress Tyrant relevance 1.60 · 10.8% (99 of 920 decks)
  29. Kess, Dissident Mage relevance 1.57 · 1.6% (75 of 4,585 decks)
  30. Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 1.55 · 3.6% (107 of 3,005 decks)

Parallel Cards

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
All parallel cards (4)
  1. Temporal Manipulation
  2. Time Warp
  3. Savor the Moment
  4. Time Stretch

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Temporal Manipulation
    3.25 60.9%
    $12.98 €9.04
  • Time Warp
    2.78 56.7%
    $6.96 €6.65
  • Nexus of Fate
    1.79 35.4%
    $5.25 €4.07
  • Temporal Mastery
    1.56 29.9%
    $4.94 €5.26
  • Mystical Tutor
    1.30 44.2%
    $19.20 €11.44
  • Time Stretch
    1.30 24.3%
    $5.62 €3.95
  • Expropriate
    1.22 23.4%
    $15.71 €11.48
  • Cyclonic Rift
    1.10 45.2%
    $39.16 €37.53
  • Karn's Temporal Sundering
    1.08 18.8%
    $1.75 €1.53
  • Mana Drain
    1.07 38.6%
    $57.00 €49.90
All most relevant (30)
  1. Temporal Manipulation relevance 3.25 · 60.9% (9,493 of 15,576 decks)
  2. Time Warp relevance 2.78 · 56.7% (8,826 of 15,576 decks)
  3. Nexus of Fate relevance 1.79 · 35.4% (5,518 of 15,576 decks)
  4. Temporal Mastery relevance 1.56 · 29.9% (4,665 of 15,576 decks)
  5. Mystical Tutor relevance 1.30 · 44.2% (6,888 of 15,576 decks)
  6. Time Stretch relevance 1.30 · 24.3% (3,778 of 15,576 decks)
  7. Expropriate relevance 1.22 · 23.4% (3,651 of 15,576 decks)
  8. Cyclonic Rift relevance 1.10 · 45.2% (7,033 of 15,576 decks)
  9. Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 1.08 · 18.8% (2,929 of 15,576 decks)
  10. Mana Drain relevance 1.07 · 38.6% (6,011 of 15,576 decks)
  11. Fierce Guardianship relevance 1.06 · 41.7% (6,493 of 15,576 decks)
  12. Rhystic Study relevance 1.04 · 44.8% (6,980 of 15,576 decks)
  13. Force of Will relevance 1.03 · 33.4% (5,203 of 15,576 decks)
  14. Temporal Trespass relevance 1.01 · 19.0% (2,957 of 15,576 decks)
  15. Walk the Aeons relevance 1.00 · 15.9% (2,476 of 15,576 decks)
  16. Brainstorm relevance 0.98 · 39.3% (6,123 of 15,576 decks)
  17. Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.95 · 15.4% (2,398 of 15,576 decks)
  18. Mystic Remora relevance 0.92 · 35.4% (5,508 of 15,576 decks)
  19. Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.89 · 15.1% (2,345 of 15,576 decks)
  20. Force of Negation relevance 0.89 · 27.3% (4,251 of 15,576 decks)
  21. Swan Song relevance 0.87 · 36.9% (5,742 of 15,576 decks)
  22. Counterspell relevance 0.85 · 51.4% (8,012 of 15,576 decks)
  23. An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.83 · 40.1% (6,252 of 15,576 decks)
  24. Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.82 · 23.3% (3,631 of 15,576 decks)
  25. Personal Tutor relevance 0.81 · 16.6% (2,578 of 15,576 decks)
  26. Part the Waterveil relevance 0.79 · 11.9% (1,857 of 15,576 decks)
  27. Ponder relevance 0.77 · 26.4% (4,114 of 15,576 decks)
  28. Frantic Search relevance 0.74 · 28.4% (4,427 of 15,576 decks)
  29. Narset's Reversal relevance 0.69 · 17.8% (2,768 of 15,576 decks)
  30. Omniscience relevance 0.68 · 15.6% (2,427 of 15,576 decks)

Creatures

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Archmage Emeritus
    0.67 21.2%
    $0.63 €1.43
  • Hullbreaker Horror
    0.61 18.4%
    $6.27 €4.45
All creatures (2)
  1. Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.67 · 21.2% (3,308 of 15,576 decks)
  2. Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.61 · 18.4% (2,863 of 15,576 decks)

Artifacts

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Sapphire Medallion
    0.82 23.3%
    $8.98 €5.69
  • Lotus Petal
    0.66 25.0%
    $34.73 €25.15
  • Chrome Mox
    0.66 22.7%
    $166.58 €103.54
  • Mana Vault
    0.64 22.2%
    $116.12 €74.87
All artifacts (4)
  1. Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.82 · 23.3% (3,631 of 15,576 decks)
  2. Lotus Petal relevance 0.66 · 25.0% (3,894 of 15,576 decks)
  3. Chrome Mox relevance 0.66 · 22.7% (3,543 of 15,576 decks)
  4. Mana Vault relevance 0.64 · 22.2% (3,455 of 15,576 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Rhystic Study
    1.04 44.8%
    $70.41 €44.02
  • Mystic Remora
    0.92 35.4%
    $15.43 €12.34
  • Omniscience
    0.68 15.6%
    $6.18 €4.84
All enchantments (3)
  1. Rhystic Study relevance 1.04 · 44.8% (6,980 of 15,576 decks)
  2. Mystic Remora relevance 0.92 · 35.4% (5,508 of 15,576 decks)
  3. Omniscience relevance 0.68 · 15.6% (2,427 of 15,576 decks)

Instants

15

Showing 1-10 of 15

Page size
  • Nexus of Fate
    1.79 35.4%
    $5.25 €4.07
  • Mystical Tutor
    1.30 44.2%
    $19.20 €11.44
  • Cyclonic Rift
    1.10 45.2%
    $39.16 €37.53
  • Mana Drain
    1.07 38.6%
    $57.00 €49.90
  • Fierce Guardianship
    1.06 41.7%
    $63.92 €48.34
  • Force of Will
    1.03 33.4%
    $60.17 €52.33
  • Brainstorm
    0.98 39.3%
    $0.57 €1.81
  • Force of Negation
    0.89 27.3%
    $50.96 €49.29
  • Swan Song
    0.87 36.9%
    $9.99 €10.07
  • Counterspell
    0.85 51.4%
    $4.09 €4.50
All instants (15)
  1. Nexus of Fate relevance 1.79 · 35.4% (5,518 of 15,576 decks)
  2. Mystical Tutor relevance 1.30 · 44.2% (6,888 of 15,576 decks)
  3. Cyclonic Rift relevance 1.10 · 45.2% (7,033 of 15,576 decks)
  4. Mana Drain relevance 1.07 · 38.6% (6,011 of 15,576 decks)
  5. Fierce Guardianship relevance 1.06 · 41.7% (6,493 of 15,576 decks)
  6. Force of Will relevance 1.03 · 33.4% (5,203 of 15,576 decks)
  7. Brainstorm relevance 0.98 · 39.3% (6,123 of 15,576 decks)
  8. Force of Negation relevance 0.89 · 27.3% (4,251 of 15,576 decks)
  9. Swan Song relevance 0.87 · 36.9% (5,742 of 15,576 decks)
  10. Counterspell relevance 0.85 · 51.4% (8,012 of 15,576 decks)
  11. An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.83 · 40.1% (6,252 of 15,576 decks)
  12. Frantic Search relevance 0.74 · 28.4% (4,427 of 15,576 decks)
  13. Narset's Reversal relevance 0.69 · 17.8% (2,768 of 15,576 decks)
  14. Pongify relevance 0.64 · 21.6% (3,372 of 15,576 decks)
  15. Flusterstorm relevance 0.64 · 19.0% (2,958 of 15,576 decks)

Sorceries

15

Showing 1-10 of 15

Page size
  • Temporal Manipulation
    3.25 60.9%
    $12.98 €9.04
  • Time Warp
    2.78 56.7%
    $6.96 €6.65
  • Temporal Mastery
    1.56 29.9%
    $4.94 €5.26
  • Time Stretch
    1.30 24.3%
    $5.62 €3.95
  • Expropriate
    1.22 23.4%
    $15.71 €11.48
  • Karn's Temporal Sundering
    1.08 18.8%
    $1.75 €1.53
  • Temporal Trespass
    1.01 19.0%
    $2.87 €3.78
  • Walk the Aeons
    1.00 15.9%
    $1.46 €0.77
  • Beacon of Tomorrows
    0.95 15.4%
    $3.46 €1.87
  • Alrund's Epiphany
    0.89 15.1%
    $4.12 €4.07
All sorceries (15)
  1. Temporal Manipulation relevance 3.25 · 60.9% (9,493 of 15,576 decks)
  2. Time Warp relevance 2.78 · 56.7% (8,826 of 15,576 decks)
  3. Temporal Mastery relevance 1.56 · 29.9% (4,665 of 15,576 decks)
  4. Time Stretch relevance 1.30 · 24.3% (3,778 of 15,576 decks)
  5. Expropriate relevance 1.22 · 23.4% (3,651 of 15,576 decks)
  6. Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 1.08 · 18.8% (2,929 of 15,576 decks)
  7. Temporal Trespass relevance 1.01 · 19.0% (2,957 of 15,576 decks)
  8. Walk the Aeons relevance 1.00 · 15.9% (2,476 of 15,576 decks)
  9. Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.95 · 15.4% (2,398 of 15,576 decks)
  10. Alrund's Epiphany relevance 0.89 · 15.1% (2,345 of 15,576 decks)
  11. Personal Tutor relevance 0.81 · 16.6% (2,578 of 15,576 decks)
  12. Part the Waterveil relevance 0.79 · 11.9% (1,857 of 15,576 decks)
  13. Ponder relevance 0.77 · 26.4% (4,114 of 15,576 decks)
  14. Preordain relevance 0.66 · 20.9% (3,251 of 15,576 decks)
  15. Solve the Equation relevance 0.64 · 15.4% (2,393 of 15,576 decks)

Utility Lands

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Mystic Sanctuary
    1.00 32.8%
    $1.58 €1.32
  • Otawara, Soaring City
    0.87 33.4%
    $25.14 €23.37
  • 0.78 26.1%
    $8.71 €7.21
  • 0.77 19.2%
    $35.99 €31.01
  • Mistrise Village
    0.61 17.6%
    $7.27 €7.17
All utility lands (5)
  1. Mystic Sanctuary relevance 1.00 · 32.8% (5,104 of 15,576 decks)
  2. Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.87 · 33.4% (5,201 of 15,576 decks)
  3. Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.78 · 26.1% (4,073 of 15,576 decks)
  4. Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.77 · 19.2% (2,995 of 15,576 decks)
  5. Mistrise Village relevance 0.61 · 17.6% (2,746 of 15,576 decks)

Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Scalding Tarn
    0.80 34.5%
    $38.37 €27.89
  • Flooded Strand
    0.72 32.4%
    $16.27 €15.12
  • Steam Vents
    0.70 29.3%
    $9.55 €9.79
  • Ancient Tomb
    0.69 28.2%
    $118.22 €105.28
  • Polluted Delta
    0.67 30.9%
    $20.75 €18.66
  • Misty Rainforest
    0.66 29.3%
    $35.99 €25.96
All lands (6)
  1. Scalding Tarn relevance 0.80 · 34.5% (5,369 of 15,576 decks)
  2. Flooded Strand relevance 0.72 · 32.4% (5,039 of 15,576 decks)
  3. Steam Vents relevance 0.70 · 29.3% (4,557 of 15,576 decks)
  4. Ancient Tomb relevance 0.69 · 28.2% (4,394 of 15,576 decks)
  5. Polluted Delta relevance 0.67 · 30.9% (4,816 of 15,576 decks)
  6. Misty Rainforest relevance 0.66 · 29.3% (4,569 of 15,576 decks)

EDH data for Capture of Jingzhou: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 15,576 real decks.