Walk the Aeons

Played in 10,961 decks

Walk the Aeons
$1.46 €0.77

Change per day

Commanders

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
All commanders (30)
  1. Narset, Enlightened Master relevance 4.79 · 23.4% (679 of 2,904 decks)
  2. Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 3.78 · 36.8% (570 of 1,547 decks)
  3. Slogurk, the Overslime relevance 2.96 · 27.4% (235 of 858 decks)
  4. Taigam, Ojutai Master relevance 2.92 · 11.5% (84 of 730 decks)
  5. Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 2.74 · 11.6% (1,044 of 8,978 decks)
  6. Myra the Magnificent relevance 2.61 · 7.7% (159 of 2,057 decks)
  7. Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 2.56 · 1.4% (74 of 5,454 decks)
  8. God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 2.53 · 27.9% (72 of 258 decks)
  9. Kang Prime relevance 2.43 · 10.0% (33 of 329 decks)
  10. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 2.36 · 10.7% (489 of 4,588 decks)
  11. Jhoira of the Ghitu relevance 2.35 · 6.2% (137 of 2,198 decks)
  12. Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 2.23 · 2.9% (117 of 4,040 decks)
  13. Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 2.15 · 6.7% (495 of 7,345 decks)
  14. Anhelo, the Painter relevance 1.94 · 1.5% (47 of 3,235 decks)
  15. Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 1.84 · 11.0% (74 of 674 decks)
  16. Elminster relevance 1.84 · 2.8% (89 of 3,178 decks)
  17. Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 1.82 · 2.7% (52 of 1,898 decks)
  18. Gandalf, Party Guest relevance 1.82 · 2.9% (140 of 4,785 decks)
  19. Pako, Arcane Retriever // Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 1.80 · 2.1% (79 of 3,819 decks)
  20. Jeleva, Nephalia's Scourge relevance 1.79 · 1.8% (27 of 1,512 decks)
  21. Medomai the Ageless relevance 1.69 · 6.9% (19 of 276 decks)
  22. Zaffai and the Tempests relevance 1.67 · 5.4% (39 of 717 decks)
  23. Scarlet Witch, Chaotic Avenger relevance 1.67 · 5.0% (44 of 880 decks)
  24. Patron of the Moon relevance 1.65 · 9.1% (63 of 689 decks)
  25. Emet-Selch, Unsundered // Hades, Sorcerer of Eld relevance 1.65 · 2.2% (51 of 2,370 decks)
  26. Yuriko, the Tiger's Shadow relevance 1.62 · 1.1% (179 of 15,910 decks)
  27. Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 1.61 · 8.8% (99 of 1,129 decks)
  28. Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 1.54 · 1.4% (80 of 5,560 decks)
  29. Kang the Conqueror relevance 1.50 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
  30. Omnath, Locus of Creation relevance 1.48 · 1.1% (100 of 8,721 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Part the Waterveil
    1.72 25.9%
    $0.92 €0.96
  • Karn's Temporal Sundering
    1.71 29.9%
    $1.82 €1.53
  • Time Warp
    1.69 34.4%
    $6.97 €6.65
  • Temporal Manipulation
    1.58 29.6%
    $12.98 €9.04
  • Nexus of Fate
    1.43 28.4%
    $5.25 €4.07
  • Temporal Mastery
    1.43 27.4%
    $4.94 €5.26
  • Time Stretch
    1.37 25.6%
    $5.54 €3.95
  • Capture of Jingzhou
    1.33 22.4%
    $7.87 €6.70
  • Beacon of Tomorrows
    1.25 20.2%
    $3.38 €1.87
  • Temporal Trespass
    1.09 20.5%
    $2.87 €3.78
All most relevant (30)
  1. Part the Waterveil relevance 1.72 · 25.9% (2,841 of 10,961 decks)
  2. Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 1.71 · 29.9% (3,278 of 10,961 decks)
  3. Time Warp relevance 1.69 · 34.4% (3,776 of 10,961 decks)
  4. Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.58 · 29.6% (3,240 of 10,961 decks)
  5. Nexus of Fate relevance 1.43 · 28.4% (3,114 of 10,961 decks)
  6. Temporal Mastery relevance 1.43 · 27.4% (3,001 of 10,961 decks)
  7. Time Stretch relevance 1.37 · 25.6% (2,803 of 10,961 decks)
  8. Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.33 · 22.4% (2,455 of 10,961 decks)
  9. Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 1.25 · 20.2% (2,216 of 10,961 decks)
  10. Temporal Trespass relevance 1.09 · 20.5% (2,242 of 10,961 decks)
  11. Alrund's Epiphany relevance 1.05 · 17.8% (1,950 of 10,961 decks)
  12. Expropriate relevance 0.87 · 16.8% (1,836 of 10,961 decks)
  13. Mystical Tutor relevance 0.86 · 29.2% (3,204 of 10,961 decks)
  14. Counterspell relevance 0.85 · 51.3% (5,625 of 10,961 decks)
  15. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.78 · 21.9% (2,398 of 10,961 decks)
  16. Brainstorm relevance 0.77 · 31.0% (3,402 of 10,961 decks)
  17. Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.73 · 30.0% (3,283 of 10,961 decks)
  18. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (2,004 of 10,961 decks)
  19. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.68 · 19.7% (2,160 of 10,961 decks)
  20. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.67 · 17.5% (1,923 of 10,961 decks)
  21. Negate relevance 0.67 · 27.6% (3,026 of 10,961 decks)
  22. An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.65 · 31.7% (3,473 of 10,961 decks)
  23. Omniscience relevance 0.65 · 14.9% (1,637 of 10,961 decks)
  24. Solve the Equation relevance 0.65 · 15.6% (1,708 of 10,961 decks)
  25. Pongify relevance 0.64 · 21.5% (2,353 of 10,961 decks)
  26. Mystic Remora relevance 0.60 · 23.2% (2,543 of 10,961 decks)
  27. Exploration relevance 0.59 · 17.1% (1,878 of 10,961 decks)
  28. Mana Drain relevance 0.59 · 21.2% (2,322 of 10,961 decks)
  29. High Tide relevance 0.59 · 14.2% (1,554 of 10,961 decks)
  30. Frantic Search relevance 0.58 · 22.3% (2,449 of 10,961 decks)

Creatures

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Azusa, Lost but Seeking
    0.78 21.9%
    $13.01 €9.12
  • Tatyova, Benthic Druid
    0.70 18.3%
    $0.30 €0.14
  • Lotus Cobra
    0.68 19.7%
    $5.67 €6.55
  • Ramunap Excavator
    0.67 17.5%
    $4.84 €3.72
  • Ancient Greenwarden
    0.56 13.8%
    $12.51 €10.39
  • Scute Swarm
    0.55 17.1%
    $9.00 €7.90
All creatures (6)
  1. Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.78 · 21.9% (2,398 of 10,961 decks)
  2. Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.70 · 18.3% (2,004 of 10,961 decks)
  3. Lotus Cobra relevance 0.68 · 19.7% (2,160 of 10,961 decks)
  4. Ramunap Excavator relevance 0.67 · 17.5% (1,923 of 10,961 decks)
  5. Ancient Greenwarden relevance 0.56 · 13.8% (1,514 of 10,961 decks)
  6. Scute Swarm relevance 0.55 · 17.1% (1,869 of 10,961 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Sapphire Medallion
    0.55 15.7%
    $8.52 €5.69
All artifacts (1)
  1. Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.55 · 15.7% (1,719 of 10,961 decks)

Enchantments

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
  • Omniscience
    0.65 14.9%
    $5.96 €4.84
  • Mystic Remora
    0.60 23.2%
    $15.57 €12.34
  • Exploration
    0.59 17.1%
    $30.17 €26.52
  • Rhystic Study
    0.57 24.8%
    $70.41 €44.02
  • Retreat to Coralhelm
    0.56 11.6%
    $0.39 €0.63
All enchantments (5)
  1. Omniscience relevance 0.65 · 14.9% (1,637 of 10,961 decks)
  2. Mystic Remora relevance 0.60 · 23.2% (2,543 of 10,961 decks)
  3. Exploration relevance 0.59 · 17.1% (1,878 of 10,961 decks)
  4. Rhystic Study relevance 0.57 · 24.8% (2,718 of 10,961 decks)
  5. Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.56 · 11.6% (1,269 of 10,961 decks)

Instants

18

Showing 1-10 of 18

Page size
  • Nexus of Fate
    1.43 28.4%
    $5.25 €4.07
  • Mystical Tutor
    0.86 29.2%
    $19.20 €11.44
  • Counterspell
    0.85 51.3%
    $4.09 €4.50
  • Brainstorm
    0.77 31.0%
    $0.62 €1.81
  • Cyclonic Rift
    0.73 30.0%
    $39.16 €37.53
  • Negate
    0.67 27.6%
    $0.25 €0.06
  • An Offer You Can't Refuse
    0.65 31.7%
    $3.52 €3.11
  • Pongify
    0.64 21.5%
    $3.47 €2.02
  • Mana Drain
    0.59 21.2%
    $57.19 €49.90
  • High Tide
    0.59 14.2%
    $1.61 €1.20
All instants (18)
  1. Nexus of Fate relevance 1.43 · 28.4% (3,114 of 10,961 decks)
  2. Mystical Tutor relevance 0.86 · 29.2% (3,204 of 10,961 decks)
  3. Counterspell relevance 0.85 · 51.3% (5,625 of 10,961 decks)
  4. Brainstorm relevance 0.77 · 31.0% (3,402 of 10,961 decks)
  5. Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.73 · 30.0% (3,283 of 10,961 decks)
  6. Negate relevance 0.67 · 27.6% (3,026 of 10,961 decks)
  7. An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.65 · 31.7% (3,473 of 10,961 decks)
  8. Pongify relevance 0.64 · 21.5% (2,353 of 10,961 decks)
  9. Mana Drain relevance 0.59 · 21.2% (2,322 of 10,961 decks)
  10. High Tide relevance 0.59 · 14.2% (1,554 of 10,961 decks)
  11. Frantic Search relevance 0.58 · 22.3% (2,449 of 10,961 decks)
  12. Arcane Denial relevance 0.57 · 24.2% (2,656 of 10,961 decks)
  13. Growth Spiral relevance 0.57 · 17.1% (1,875 of 10,961 decks)
  14. Dig Through Time relevance 0.56 · 14.6% (1,600 of 10,961 decks)
  15. Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.56 · 18.0% (1,970 of 10,961 decks)
  16. Swan Song relevance 0.56 · 23.6% (2,586 of 10,961 decks)
  17. Force of Will relevance 0.56 · 18.1% (1,979 of 10,961 decks)
  18. Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.54 · 21.4% (2,350 of 10,961 decks)

Sorceries

14

Showing 1-10 of 14

Page size
  • Part the Waterveil
    1.72 25.9%
    $0.92 €0.96
  • Karn's Temporal Sundering
    1.71 29.9%
    $1.82 €1.53
  • Time Warp
    1.69 34.4%
    $6.97 €6.65
  • Temporal Manipulation
    1.58 29.6%
    $12.98 €9.04
  • Temporal Mastery
    1.43 27.4%
    $4.94 €5.26
  • Time Stretch
    1.37 25.6%
    $5.54 €3.95
  • Capture of Jingzhou
    1.33 22.4%
    $7.87 €6.70
  • Beacon of Tomorrows
    1.25 20.2%
    $3.38 €1.87
  • Temporal Trespass
    1.09 20.5%
    $2.87 €3.78
  • Alrund's Epiphany
    1.05 17.8%
    $4.12 €4.07
All sorceries (14)
  1. Part the Waterveil relevance 1.72 · 25.9% (2,841 of 10,961 decks)
  2. Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 1.71 · 29.9% (3,278 of 10,961 decks)
  3. Time Warp relevance 1.69 · 34.4% (3,776 of 10,961 decks)
  4. Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.58 · 29.6% (3,240 of 10,961 decks)
  5. Temporal Mastery relevance 1.43 · 27.4% (3,001 of 10,961 decks)
  6. Time Stretch relevance 1.37 · 25.6% (2,803 of 10,961 decks)
  7. Capture of Jingzhou relevance 1.33 · 22.4% (2,455 of 10,961 decks)
  8. Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 1.25 · 20.2% (2,216 of 10,961 decks)
  9. Temporal Trespass relevance 1.09 · 20.5% (2,242 of 10,961 decks)
  10. Alrund's Epiphany relevance 1.05 · 17.8% (1,950 of 10,961 decks)
  11. Expropriate relevance 0.87 · 16.8% (1,836 of 10,961 decks)
  12. Solve the Equation relevance 0.65 · 15.6% (1,708 of 10,961 decks)
  13. Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.55 · 10.8% (1,187 of 10,961 decks)
  14. Ponder relevance 0.54 · 18.3% (2,002 of 10,961 decks)

Utility Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Mystic Sanctuary
    1.22 39.8%
    $1.54 €1.32
  • Reliquary Tower
    0.59 43.3%
    $4.81 €3.95
All utility lands (2)
  1. Mystic Sanctuary relevance 1.22 · 39.8% (4,364 of 10,961 decks)
  2. Reliquary Tower relevance 0.59 · 43.3% (4,749 of 10,961 decks)

Lands

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Simic Growth Chamber
    0.74 20.8%
    $0.37 €0.38
  • Breeding Pool
    0.59 24.7%
    $9.52 €9.36
  • Misty Rainforest
    0.59 26.0%
    $36.18 €25.96
  • Yavimaya Coast
    0.55 19.2%
    $0.67 €0.46
All lands (4)
  1. Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (2,281 of 10,961 decks)
  2. Breeding Pool relevance 0.59 · 24.7% (2,712 of 10,961 decks)
  3. Misty Rainforest relevance 0.59 · 26.0% (2,849 of 10,961 decks)
  4. Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.55 · 19.2% (2,105 of 10,961 decks)

EDH data for Walk the Aeons: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 10,961 real decks.