Jokulhaups
Played in 283 Naya decks
525+8+3+5+1+8+17+8+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 1.8% of decks
Hazezon, Shaper of Sand 1.8% of decks
Palladia-Mors 2.6% of decks
Palladia-Mors 2.6% of decks
Akiri, Line-Slinger // Anara, Wolvid Familiar 4.8% of decks
Akiri, Line-Slinger // Anara, Wolvid Familiar 4.8% of decks
Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 1.1% of decks
Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 1.1% of decks
Jacques le Vert 1.0% of decks
Jacques le Vert 1.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Armageddon 71.7% of decks
Armageddon 71.7% of decks
Obliterate 44.9% of decks
Obliterate 44.9% of decks
Ravages of War 42.8% of decks
Ravages of War 42.8% of decks
Catastrophe 39.9% of decks
Catastrophe 39.9% of decks
Boom // Bust 36.4% of decks
Boom // Bust 36.4% of decks
Ruination 32.9% of decks
Ruination 32.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.33 · 1.8% (79 of 4,385 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 0.83 · 2.6% (3 of 114 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.49 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.31 · 1.1% (1 of 90 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.30 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (25)
- Armageddon relevance 3.40 · 71.7% (203 of 283 decks)
- Obliterate relevance 2.94 · 44.9% (127 of 283 decks)
- Ravages of War relevance 2.64 · 42.8% (121 of 283 decks)
- Catastrophe relevance 2.55 · 39.9% (113 of 283 decks)
- Boom // Bust relevance 2.38 · 36.4% (103 of 283 decks)
- Ruination relevance 2.18 · 32.9% (93 of 283 decks)
- Impending Disaster relevance 2.07 · 30.7% (87 of 283 decks)
- Cataclysm relevance 1.37 · 20.5% (58 of 283 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.36 · 34.3% (97 of 283 decks)
- Fall of the Thran relevance 1.28 · 20.5% (58 of 283 decks)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.26 · 32.5% (92 of 283 decks)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.21 · 37.5% (106 of 283 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.17 · 32.9% (93 of 283 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 33.9% (96 of 283 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.06 · 33.2% (94 of 283 decks)
- Price of Glory relevance 1.03 · 16.3% (46 of 283 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.01 · 38.9% (110 of 283 decks)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.01 · 40.6% (115 of 283 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.97 · 23.3% (66 of 283 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.90 · 21.9% (62 of 283 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.86 · 27.2% (77 of 283 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.85 · 23.0% (65 of 283 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.83 · 23.0% (65 of 283 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.83 · 25.1% (71 of 283 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.78 · 18.4% (52 of 283 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Dune Chanter relevance 1.21 · 37.5% (106 of 283 decks)
- Ramunap Excavator relevance 1.17 · 32.9% (93 of 283 decks)
- Titania, Protector of Argoth relevance 1.13 · 33.9% (96 of 283 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 1.06 · 33.2% (94 of 283 decks)
- World Shaper relevance 0.97 · 23.3% (66 of 283 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.83 · 23.0% (65 of 283 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.83 · 25.1% (71 of 283 decks)
- Aftermath Analyst relevance 0.78 · 18.4% (52 of 283 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Crucible of Worlds relevance 1.26 · 32.5% (92 of 283 decks)
- Zuran Orb relevance 1.01 · 38.9% (110 of 283 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.85 · 23.0% (65 of 283 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Impending Disaster relevance 2.07 · 30.7% (87 of 283 decks)
- Fall of the Thran relevance 1.28 · 20.5% (58 of 283 decks)
- Price of Glory relevance 1.03 · 16.3% (46 of 283 decks)
- Burgeoning relevance 0.90 · 21.9% (62 of 283 decks)
- Exploration relevance 0.86 · 27.2% (77 of 283 decks)
All instants (1)
- Crop Rotation relevance 1.01 · 40.6% (115 of 283 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Armageddon relevance 3.40 · 71.7% (203 of 283 decks)
- Obliterate relevance 2.94 · 44.9% (127 of 283 decks)
- Ravages of War relevance 2.64 · 42.8% (121 of 283 decks)
- Catastrophe relevance 2.55 · 39.9% (113 of 283 decks)
- Boom // Bust relevance 2.38 · 36.4% (103 of 283 decks)
- Ruination relevance 2.18 · 32.9% (93 of 283 decks)
- Cataclysm relevance 1.37 · 20.5% (58 of 283 decks)
- Splendid Reclamation relevance 1.36 · 34.3% (97 of 283 decks)
All utility lands (17)
- Wasteland relevance 1.33 · 29.3% (83 of 283 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 1.24 · 32.2% (91 of 283 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 1.12 · 20.1% (57 of 283 decks)
- Ramunap Ruins relevance 1.11 · 32.5% (92 of 283 decks)
- Hashep Oasis relevance 1.06 · 31.1% (88 of 283 decks)
- Desert of the Fervent relevance 1.04 · 30.7% (87 of 283 decks)
- Shefet Dunes relevance 1.04 · 30.4% (86 of 283 decks)
- Desert of the Indomitable relevance 1.04 · 30.7% (87 of 283 decks)
- Dunes of the Dead relevance 1.02 · 29.3% (83 of 283 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.98 · 29.7% (84 of 283 decks)
- Desert of the True relevance 0.97 · 28.6% (81 of 283 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.92 · 26.5% (75 of 283 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.86 · 24.7% (70 of 283 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.86 · 23.3% (66 of 283 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.83 · 23.0% (65 of 283 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.83 · 20.5% (58 of 283 decks)
- Cradle of the Accursed relevance 0.80 · 18.7% (53 of 283 decks)
All lands (8)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 1.02 · 32.2% (91 of 283 decks)
- Creosote Heath relevance 0.98 · 30.7% (87 of 283 decks)
- Abraded Bluffs relevance 0.93 · 29.3% (83 of 283 decks)
- Thornglint Bridge relevance 0.89 · 23.7% (67 of 283 decks)
- Slagwoods Bridge relevance 0.88 · 23.7% (67 of 283 decks)
- Rustvale Bridge relevance 0.88 · 23.7% (67 of 283 decks)
- Survivors' Encampment relevance 0.85 · 22.3% (63 of 283 decks)
- Mirage Mesa relevance 0.81 · 23.0% (65 of 283 decks)
EDH data for Jokulhaups: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 283 real decks.













































