Nexus of Fate
Played in 39,142 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
3030+2+4+3+17+15+5+4+
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Narset, Enlightened Master relevance 4.83 · 45.8% (1,354 of 2,955 decks)
- Yennett, Cryptic Sovereign relevance 4.11 · 19.6% (1,003 of 5,115 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 3.73 · 27.3% (1,702 of 6,234 decks)
- Jodah, Archmage Eternal relevance 3.46 · 7.9% (394 of 4,978 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 3.25 · 17.9% (741 of 4,133 decks)
- Kalamax, the Stormsire relevance 3.19 · 16.8% (770 of 4,581 decks)
- Zethi, Arcane Blademaster relevance 3.13 · 18.2% (616 of 3,393 decks)
- Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 3.04 · 16.2% (921 of 5,671 decks)
- Zaffai and the Tempests relevance 2.80 · 31.4% (228 of 726 decks)
- Scarlet Witch, Chaotic Avenger relevance 2.74 · 27.9% (257 of 922 decks)
- Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 2.73 · 18.3% (355 of 1,940 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 2.69 · 26.2% (1,989 of 7,581 decks)
- Edric, Spymaster of Trest relevance 2.64 · 20.9% (330 of 1,577 decks)
- Kang Prime relevance 2.59 · 30.4% (105 of 345 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 2.55 · 16.1% (503 of 3,125 decks)
- Elminster relevance 2.54 · 12.4% (404 of 3,246 decks)
- Fire Lord Azula relevance 2.50 · 5.0% (1,577 of 31,752 decks)
- Gandalf, Party Guest relevance 2.44 · 9.7% (484 of 5,006 decks)
- Yuriko, the Tiger's Shadow relevance 2.29 · 7.6% (1,246 of 16,305 decks)
- Codie, Vociferous Codex relevance 2.26 · 3.4% (190 of 5,566 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 2.22 · 37.0% (223 of 602 decks)
- Kylox, Visionary Inventor relevance 2.20 · 22.2% (125 of 562 decks)
- Itazura, Lingering Wick relevance 2.15 · 15.7% (228 of 1,456 decks)
- Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 2.12 · 33.5% (216 of 645 decks)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Cecily, Haunted Mage relevance 2.09 · 7.9% (29 of 366 decks)
- Jhoira of the Ghitu relevance 2.05 · 12.7% (286 of 2,256 decks)
- Jeleva, Nephalia's Scourge relevance 2.03 · 8.1% (126 of 1,562 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 2.01 · 8.7% (104 of 1,194 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 1.98 · 13.9% (165 of 1,183 decks)
- Medomai the Ageless relevance 1.94 · 18.3% (52 of 284 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Time Warp relevance 1.21 · 24.6% (9,628 of 39,142 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.17 · 21.9% (8,589 of 39,142 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 1.14 · 21.8% (8,551 of 39,142 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 1.14 · 21.2% (8,307 of 39,142 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 1.12 · 37.9% (14,838 of 39,142 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 1.09 · 43.7% (17,096 of 39,142 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 1.03 · 19.9% (7,799 of 39,142 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.96 · 39.3% (15,375 of 39,142 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.88 · 14.3% (5,578 of 39,142 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.85 · 14.3% (5,605 of 39,142 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.84 · 36.1% (14,136 of 39,142 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.83 · 25.1% (9,830 of 39,142 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.83 · 50.3% (19,676 of 39,142 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.83 · 29.9% (11,696 of 39,142 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.83 · 21.1% (8,277 of 39,142 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.82 · 15.4% (6,022 of 39,142 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.80 · 18.5% (7,233 of 39,142 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.80 · 25.2% (9,879 of 39,142 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.80 · 31.5% (12,325 of 39,142 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.79 · 20.5% (8,012 of 39,142 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.79 · 30.2% (11,829 of 39,142 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.77 · 26.2% (10,259 of 39,142 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.75 · 21.5% (8,423 of 39,142 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.75 · 24.4% (9,550 of 39,142 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.71 · 27.1% (10,616 of 39,142 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.70 · 33.8% (13,239 of 39,142 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.68 · 13.4% (5,256 of 39,142 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.67 · 28.2% (11,019 of 39,142 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.66 · 11.6% (4,524 of 39,142 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.66 · 19.9% (7,793 of 39,142 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.83 · 25.1% (9,830 of 39,142 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.80 · 25.2% (9,879 of 39,142 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.75 · 21.5% (8,423 of 39,142 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.65 · 20.4% (7,998 of 39,142 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.60 · 31.7% (12,392 of 39,142 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.58 · 14.2% (5,574 of 39,142 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.84 · 36.1% (14,136 of 39,142 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.80 · 18.5% (7,233 of 39,142 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.71 · 27.1% (10,616 of 39,142 decks)
All instants (17)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 1.12 · 37.9% (14,838 of 39,142 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 1.09 · 43.7% (17,096 of 39,142 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.96 · 39.3% (15,375 of 39,142 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.83 · 50.3% (19,676 of 39,142 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.83 · 29.9% (11,696 of 39,142 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.83 · 21.1% (8,277 of 39,142 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.80 · 31.5% (12,325 of 39,142 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.79 · 20.5% (8,012 of 39,142 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.79 · 30.2% (11,829 of 39,142 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.75 · 24.4% (9,550 of 39,142 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.70 · 33.8% (13,239 of 39,142 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.67 · 28.2% (11,019 of 39,142 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.66 · 19.9% (7,793 of 39,142 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.64 · 21.6% (8,444 of 39,142 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.63 · 19.3% (7,561 of 39,142 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.61 · 14.7% (5,747 of 39,142 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.59 · 24.8% (9,696 of 39,142 decks)
All sorceries (15)
- Time Warp relevance 1.21 · 24.6% (9,628 of 39,142 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 1.17 · 21.9% (8,589 of 39,142 decks)
- Temporal Mastery relevance 1.14 · 21.8% (8,551 of 39,142 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 1.14 · 21.2% (8,307 of 39,142 decks)
- Expropriate relevance 1.03 · 19.9% (7,799 of 39,142 decks)
- Beacon of Tomorrows relevance 0.88 · 14.3% (5,578 of 39,142 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.85 · 14.3% (5,605 of 39,142 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 0.82 · 15.4% (6,022 of 39,142 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.77 · 26.2% (10,259 of 39,142 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.68 · 13.4% (5,256 of 39,142 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.66 · 11.6% (4,524 of 39,142 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.60 · 14.3% (5,612 of 39,142 decks)
- Mnemonic Deluge relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (4,206 of 39,142 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.57 · 18.1% (7,104 of 39,142 decks)
- Enter the Infinite relevance 0.56 · 9.7% (3,811 of 39,142 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 1.05 · 34.4% (13,472 of 39,142 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.80 · 20.1% (7,857 of 39,142 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.71 · 27.1% (10,614 of 39,142 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.70 · 23.6% (9,236 of 39,142 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.65 · 47.4% (18,541 of 39,142 decks)
All lands (4)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.63 · 27.0% (10,555 of 39,142 decks)
- Steam Vents relevance 0.60 · 25.2% (9,875 of 39,142 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.56 · 25.0% (9,788 of 39,142 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.56 · 25.7% (10,072 of 39,142 decks)
EDH data for Nexus of Fate: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 39,142 real decks.


















































































