Bioengineered Future
Played in 1,108 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (29)
- Jyoti, Moag Ancient relevance 1.68 · 4.2% (51 of 1,221 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 1.31 · 1.5% (142 of 9,431 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.28 · 1.8% (86 of 4,880 decks)
- Zimone, All-Questioning relevance 1.25 · 3.5% (23 of 664 decks)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 1.13 · 2.1% (35 of 1,662 decks)
- Bonny Pall, Clearcutter relevance 1.08 · 1.9% (37 of 1,964 decks)
- Berta, Wise Extrapolator relevance 0.98 · 1.5% (41 of 2,758 decks)
- The Third Doctor // Clara Oswald relevance 0.92 · 15.8% (3 of 19 decks)
- Tam, Observant Sequencer // Deep Sight relevance 0.90 · 2.4% (14 of 592 decks)
- Tanazir Quandrix relevance 0.88 · 2.6% (12 of 468 decks)
- Sin, Unending Cataclysm relevance 0.84 · 1.9% (16 of 864 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.77 · 1.9% (12 of 629 decks)
- Xolatoyac, the Smiling Flood relevance 0.75 · 1.3% (19 of 1,412 decks)
- Sita Varma, Masked Racer relevance 0.74 · 3.2% (6 of 188 decks)
- Zimone, Paradox Sculptor relevance 0.72 · 1.2% (22 of 1,866 decks)
- The Thirteenth Doctor // Ace, Fearless Rebel relevance 0.70 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Donatello, the Brains // Michelangelo, the Heart relevance 0.68 · 1.3% (15 of 1,133 decks)
- Blue, Loyal Raptor relevance 0.63 · 9.5% (2 of 21 decks)
- Marcus, Mutant Mayor relevance 0.61 · 2.5% (5 of 199 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.55 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Mikey & Don, Party Planners relevance 0.53 · 1.2% (9 of 779 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.52 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Nicanzil, Current Conductor relevance 0.50 · 1.3% (7 of 554 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.47 · 1.8% (4 of 217 decks)
- Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher // Master Chef relevance 0.45 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Albiorix, Goose Tyrant // Wild Goose Chase relevance 0.43 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Venus, Torn Between Worlds relevance 0.35 · 1.4% (3 of 214 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (1 of 15 decks)
- Master Chef // Alora, Merry Thief relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (186 of 1,108 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.64 · 30.3% (336 of 1,108 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.59 · 17.5% (194 of 1,108 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.59 · 42.5% (471 of 1,108 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.58 · 20.8% (231 of 1,108 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.58 · 30.2% (335 of 1,108 decks)
- Genemorph Imago relevance 0.54 · 11.1% (123 of 1,108 decks)
- Seedship Agrarian relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (104 of 1,108 decks)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (118 of 1,108 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (109 of 1,108 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.50 · 13.6% (151 of 1,108 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.50 · 16.6% (184 of 1,108 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.50 · 16.6% (184 of 1,108 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.50 · 16.0% (177 of 1,108 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.48 · 22.3% (247 of 1,108 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.48 · 11.5% (127 of 1,108 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.47 · 20.4% (226 of 1,108 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.46 · 13.0% (144 of 1,108 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.45 · 22.0% (244 of 1,108 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.44 · 8.0% (89 of 1,108 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (111 of 1,108 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (107 of 1,108 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (115 of 1,108 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.44 · 19.2% (213 of 1,108 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.43 · 11.3% (125 of 1,108 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.43 · 24.7% (274 of 1,108 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.43 · 11.5% (127 of 1,108 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.42 · 13.4% (149 of 1,108 decks)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.42 · 7.2% (80 of 1,108 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.41 · 17.3% (192 of 1,108 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Mightform Harmonizer relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (186 of 1,108 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.64 · 30.3% (336 of 1,108 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.59 · 17.5% (194 of 1,108 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.59 · 42.5% (471 of 1,108 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.58 · 20.8% (231 of 1,108 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.58 · 30.2% (335 of 1,108 decks)
- Genemorph Imago relevance 0.54 · 11.1% (123 of 1,108 decks)
- Seedship Agrarian relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (104 of 1,108 decks)
- Loot, Exuberant Explorer relevance 0.50 · 16.6% (184 of 1,108 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 0.50 · 16.6% (184 of 1,108 decks)
- Icetill Explorer relevance 0.50 · 16.0% (177 of 1,108 decks)
- Tireless Provisioner relevance 0.48 · 22.3% (247 of 1,108 decks)
- Lotus Cobra relevance 0.47 · 20.4% (226 of 1,108 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.45 · 22.0% (244 of 1,108 decks)
- Sazh's Chocobo relevance 0.44 · 9.7% (107 of 1,108 decks)
- Horizon Explorer relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (115 of 1,108 decks)
- Azusa, Lost but Seeking relevance 0.44 · 19.2% (213 of 1,108 decks)
- Bristly Bill, Spine Sower relevance 0.42 · 13.4% (149 of 1,108 decks)
- Tatyova, Steward of Tides relevance 0.40 · 9.6% (106 of 1,108 decks)
- Ashaya, Soul of the Wild relevance 0.39 · 14.2% (157 of 1,108 decks)
- Springheart Nantuko relevance 0.38 · 12.4% (137 of 1,108 decks)
- Dryad of the Ilysian Grove relevance 0.38 · 14.7% (163 of 1,108 decks)
- Aesi, Tyrant of Gyre Strait relevance 0.37 · 19.7% (218 of 1,108 decks)
- Oracle of Mul Daya relevance 0.37 · 14.1% (156 of 1,108 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.36 · 18.8% (208 of 1,108 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.36 · 15.3% (170 of 1,108 decks)
- Biomechan Engineer relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (75 of 1,108 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Larval Scoutlander relevance 0.42 · 7.2% (80 of 1,108 decks)
- Chocobo Racetrack relevance 0.37 · 8.1% (90 of 1,108 decks)
All enchantments (12)
- Eusocial Engineering relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (118 of 1,108 decks)
- Retreat to Kazandu relevance 0.50 · 13.6% (151 of 1,108 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.48 · 11.5% (127 of 1,108 decks)
- Druid Class relevance 0.46 · 13.0% (144 of 1,108 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (111 of 1,108 decks)
- Sapling Nursery relevance 0.43 · 11.3% (125 of 1,108 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.43 · 11.5% (127 of 1,108 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.38 · 14.6% (162 of 1,108 decks)
- Primeval Bounty relevance 0.38 · 9.5% (105 of 1,108 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.36 · 23.1% (256 of 1,108 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.36 · 14.1% (156 of 1,108 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 0.36 · 9.4% (104 of 1,108 decks)
All instants (3)
- Divert Disaster relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (109 of 1,108 decks)
- Seedship Impact relevance 0.44 · 8.0% (89 of 1,108 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.41 · 17.3% (192 of 1,108 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Explore relevance 0.43 · 24.7% (274 of 1,108 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.36 · 12.5% (138 of 1,108 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.40 · 21.6% (239 of 1,108 decks)
All lands (3)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.74 · 45.7% (506 of 1,108 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.56 · 33.8% (375 of 1,108 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.45 · 22.8% (253 of 1,108 decks)
EDH data for Bioengineered Future: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,108 real decks.